Jump to content

The Yankees screwed Brian Roberts


isestrex

Recommended Posts

We all know that the Yankees were hoping for lightning in a bottle with Brian and even though he remained healthy, he was still a horrible let down. Getting designated for assignment this afternoon after the trade deadline was not all that surprising.

But finding this out was:

According to Cots, Brian Roberts has Plate Appearance incentive bonuses. This makes sense as they obviously wanted to hedge his playing time against the 1/$2M contract. He gets bonuses for 250+ PA, 300+ PA, 350+ PA... and so on up to 650 PA's.

Brian is currently sitting at 348 Plate Appearances. His game log over the past 2 weeks:

7/19 - 2 for 4

7/20 - 2 for 4

7/21 - 0 for 4

7/22 - 2 for 5

7/23 - DNP

7/24 - 0 for 4

7/25 - 1 for 4

7/26 - 0 for 3

7/27 - DNP

7/28 - 0 for 3

7/29 - DNP

7/30 - DNP

He got benched in 3 of his last 4 games to keep him from reaching the next pay check bonus. I realize that this is a business and I don't fault the Yankees for making a smart business decision on a player they were preparing to drop anyway... but it still ticks me off. The Orioles would never have done this to Brian if this exact contract were in Baltimore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Yes, as we all know, the New York Yankees are the stingiest of teams. A tiny performance bonus would definitely alter their plans more than, say, Brian Roberts not being good at baseball anymore.

I would not put anything past them. They could win the world series every year if they wanted to, and weren't pocketing so much money. I know people mock any conspiracy theorists about the Yankees, but I still think it's fishy that major league baseball doesn't try and move another team into Brooklyn or new York city somewhere to compete against them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all know that the Yankees were hoping for lightning in a bottle with Brian and even though he remained healthy, he was still a horrible let down. Getting designated for assignment this afternoon after the trade deadline was not all that surprising.

But finding this out was:

According to Cots, Brian Roberts has Plate Appearance incentive bonuses. This makes sense as they obviously wanted to hedge his playing time against the 1/$2M contract. He gets bonuses for 250+ PA, 300+ PA, 350+ PA... and so on up to 650 PA's.

Brian is currently sitting at 348 Plate Appearances. His game log over the past 2 weeks:

7/19 - 2 for 4

7/20 - 2 for 4

7/21 - 0 for 4

7/22 - 2 for 5

7/23 - DNP

7/24 - 0 for 4

7/25 - 1 for 4

7/26 - 0 for 3

7/27 - DNP

7/28 - 0 for 3

7/29 - DNP

7/30 - DNP

He got benched in 3 of his last 4 games to keep him from reaching the next pay check bonus. I realize that this is a business and I don't fault the Yankees for making a smart business decision on a player they were preparing to drop anyway... but it still ticks me off. The Orioles would never have done this to Brian if this exact contract were in Baltimore.

I'm sure the bonuses were a contributing factor. The bigger factor was thee Yankees upgrading the position by adding Drew and Prado. I don't have a problem with the Yankees business practices regarding Roberts. I'm more worried that they have been quietly improving their team for the stretch run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think I've ever heard of someone getting "screwed" by virtue of receiving more than $2 million dollars from a MLB team in exchange for poor play.

I also don't think the Yankees would have thrown any roadblocks in front of BRob's bonuses if his play hadn't been poor.

He didn't deserve extra money. That's pretty much the long/short of it, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think I've ever heard of someone getting "screwed" by virtue of receiving more than $2 million dollars from a MLB team in exchange for poor play.

I also don't think the Yankees would have thrown any roadblocks in front of BRob's bonuses if his play hadn't been poor.

He didn't deserve extra money. That's pretty much the long/short of it, IMO.

If Brian Roberts had played better then Joe Girardi would have played him more often, and Brian Cashman wouldn't have felt the need to shore up his infield at the trading deadline.

These are bonuses. You're not guaranteed playing time bonuses for staying healthy and not being epically bad. You get a playing time bonus for convincing your manager and GM that you're good enough to get that amount of playing time.

In any case, the Yankees lose more money in the couch cushions than a lot of other teams have as offseason budgets. Does anyone really think that they wanted to keep and play Roberts but instead thought "oooh, we can save like $200 grand by DFAing him!"? The guys they picked up at the deadline probably cost more than his bonus!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brian took $40 million of the Orioles money for four years that resulted in about 720 plate appearances. Markakis and Hardy get that in a single season.

So... your point is? Ryan Howard took $125M of the Phils' money for being the equivalent of a 40-year-old Jeff Conine. Darren Driefort took tens of $millions from the Dodgers for sitting on the DL. Jason Schmidt did something similar. It happens every day. Teams risk their cash in an attempt to maximize wins. Sometimes it pays off, sometimes it crashes and burns. The idea that the players should bail out the team is ludicrous. Both parties went into the contract knowing full well what the possible outcomes were. Or should have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So... your point is? Ryan Howard took $125M of the Phils' money for being the equivalent of a 40-year-old Jeff Conine. Darren Driefort took tens of $millions from the Dodgers for sitting on the DL. Jason Schmidt did something similar. It happens every day. Teams risk their cash in an attempt to maximize wins. Sometimes it pays off, sometimes it crashes and burns. The idea that the players should bail out the team is ludicrous. Both parties went into the contract knowing full well what the possible outcomes were. Or should have.

So the point is Brian Roberts did not meet his plate appearance incentive with the Yankees. Players risk their time in an attempt to maximize earnings. The idea that the team should bail out the players is ludicrous. Both parties went into the contract knowing full well what the possible outcomes were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the point is Brian Roberts did not meet his plate appearance incentive with the Yankees. Players risk their time in an attempt to maximize earnings. The idea that the team should bail out the players is ludicrous. Both parties went into the contract knowing full well what the possible outcomes were.

The point is, your comment that Roberts took money is wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Actions:  Grayson sent to AAA.
    • I certainly don't disagree that Westburg is ready.  But I do disagree that we will see him up soon as we stupidly have Frazier on the roster, and with 8M tied up in him, he isn't going to be cut or even be riding on the bench much.  It's foolish and headscratching, but it is what it is at this point.  Better guys will be stuck in the minors (Westburg, Ortiz) because we have the MLB roster clogged with guys that should have never been signed (Frazier) or should be moved IMO (Mateo).  
    • My message is  "Wake Up" and understand what is happening now Elias as more information now.   A month more. Elias just sent Grayson to AAA.  Why?  Because he had 5 starters that are better.   In SPRING TRAINING.    You think ST does not matter?   It mattered to Elias and Grayson. A month ago Elias didn't know how Westburg would do in ST.  Now he does.  878 OPS.   A month ago Elias didn't know how Frazier would do in ST.  Now he does.  597 OPS. I would think that Frazier would want to impress his new manager, coaches and teammates.  And that he would know he is competing for playing time at 2nd base with Urias, Vavra, Westburg and Ortiz.   597 is not going to cut it.  ST mattered to Elias and Grayson about starting.   Why would it not matter about 2nd base? I think Frazier has 17 days to turn it around.   Do I know its 17 days?  No.  It could be 30 days.  But Elias knows that last year the team went 7-14 in April.  And he does not want that to happen again. Elias is in win mode.   He will play his best players.  And he is going to pay the 8m whether Frazier starts a lot or a little.   The important thing is to win.  
    • So the question is, is there a penalty with that? You keep your pick this year but we want your 2 this year and your next 3 firsts.  The 4th pick is definitely worth a 1 and 2 and it’s obviously worth more in a regular trade.
    • There's no way he's pulling the plug on 8 million Frazier when he didn't pull the plug on 700k Rougned Odor last year.  Odor doesn't bring the versatility (Frazier can stand around in the outfield, BFD) that Frazier does so he's going to be more inclined to make us suffer the entire season. Frazier should have never been signed, Westburg should have had to battle it out in camp for the role.  But I agree with SG, he was ready late last year.
    • How common is it for a star player to request a trade in public and then the original team just ends up keeping him instead? I'm sure it happens but I'm guessing that is not the usual way of things.   I think Lamar making it public he wants out makes it more likely he goes.
    • I think the Colts are interested but want to make a trade with a package of picks that doesn’t include the #4 overall this year.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...