Jump to content

Dooooook Loooooses


Pedro Cerrano

Recommended Posts

They are a sweet 16 team and will be a top 2 or 3 seed..Same thing i said last year when everyone jumped on me.

Their defense, much like UCLA last year, will have to carry them.

They need Paulus to play better and they need one of the freshman to become a consistent scorer.

McRoberts and Nelson will both be on the first or second team ALL ACC, so they need the secondary players to do something.

Mark this thread, they will not be a #2 or 3...Not this year, the talent just isn't there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Mark this thread, they will not be a #2 or 3...Not this year, the talent just isn't there.

I disagree. This team is much more talented than last years, just doesn't have the experience. This is a very talented team but it is very young talent and it takes time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually think they are poised for an early exit. They are exactly the type of overrated team to get upset in the first or second round. They'll get a 4 or 5 seed after about a 10-6 ACC record.

Agreed, a 4 or 5 because of their name. The same reason they were #5 going into this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually think they are poised for an early exit. They are exactly the type of overrated team to get upset in the first or second round. They'll get a 4 or 5 seed after about a 10-6 ACC record.

I know it happened once in the tourney but Duke doesn't lose to mid majors like George Mason or Weber St.

Now, they could definitely lose in the second round. They will play the 3rd or 4th best team in the SEC or Big East or something like that and could certainly lose.

However, as the young talent gets more experience and if they continue to play their lock down defense, they are going to be tough to beat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree. This team is much more talented than last years, just doesn't have the experience. This is a very talented team but it is very young talent and it takes time.

Not this year, I'm telling you. I've only seen 5 games of theirs so far, but I am so unimpressed it's scary. I actually think Maryland is better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed, a 4 or 5 because of their name. The same reason they were #5 going into this game.

They started off ranked #5 because while everyone around them loses, they continue to win and they have beaten some quality teams.

No way they are a top 5 team. Heck, they aren't one of the 10 best teams in the country. But they are amongst the top 11-20 and can beat anyone and will be very dangerous come tourney time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it happened once in the tourney but Duke doesn't lose to mid majors like George Mason or Weber St.

Now, they could definitely lose in the second round. They will play the 3rd or 4th best team in the SEC or Big East or something like that and could certainly lose.

However, as the young talent gets more experience and if they continue to play their lock down defense, they are going to be tough to beat.

I love it, but it wont even be fun this year, we're so much better right now it's not even funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree. This team is much more talented than last years, just doesn't have the experience. This is a very talented team but it is very young talent and it takes time.

No way. Other than McRoberts and Nelson, they are talent-poor. Thei freshmen are OK, but not the types to make enough of a difference by year's end. There isn't a Hansborough among them who can put this team on his back.

They have no go-to guy like Reddick, they have no enforecer like SheWill, and they have no senior leader who can keep them grounded.

Yes, I think a 4 or 5 is right, and I agree it'll be on name as much as anything.

This has turned out to be quite a day so far. #1, #5, #8, #17 all knocked off so far.

If Carolina can hold serve at home against FSU, we're looking at being the #1 team in the country on Monday. Thank you Oregon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love it, but it wont even be fun this year, we're so much better right now it's not even funny.

With what you brought back and brought in, i would hope you are better.

But if we get to the sweet 16, our season is a huge success.

If you guys don't make the final 4, yours is a failure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way. Other than McRoberts and Nelson, they are talent-poor. Thei freshmen are OK, but not the types to make enough of a difference by year's end. There isn't a Hansborough among them who can put this team on his back.

They have no go-to guy like Reddick, they have no enforecer like SheWill, and they have no senior leader who can keep them grounded.

Yes, I think a 4 or 5 is right, and I agree it'll be on name as much as anything.

This has turned out to be quite a day so far. #1, #5, #8, #17 all knocked off so far.

If Carolina can hold serve at home against FSU, we're looking at being the #1 team in the country on Monday. Thank you Oregon.

We'll be #1 for now, but we're not running the table in the ACC, even if we are by far the best team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh give me a break.

It is not more talented than last year's team. You lost Redick and Williams. None of your recruits make up for that. You can sugar coat your argument with claims about potential, et al. But this is not a better team, and won't be a better team by year's end. And not making the Final Four last year was a real wasted opportunity.

As for the other topics, they will be anywhere between a 2-4 seed. And when they get bounced will depend largely on their draw. Because of Paulus, this Duke team relies heavily on matchups at the guard position. A team like Gonzaga for example, with smaller guards and slow down offense, fits Duke's style this year and Paulus ineptitude at the point can be concealed. More physical, larger guards (like Marquette and VaTech) are going to punk Paulus up and down the floor.

As for the schedule, it doesn't really matter, all ACC teams end up playing very tough schedule- whether the stats reflect that or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With what you brought back and brought in, i would hope you are better.

But if we get to the sweet 16, our season is a huge success.

If you guys don't make the final 4, yours is a failure.

I dont think Coach K would agree that the sweet 16 would be a success. Not a failure, but dissapointing, yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • @RZNJ and @Can_of_corn I appreciate the dialog. I think Jeter could have been a solid defender had he not been asked to play SS. So the quote above, (forgive me for picking a nit), is not entirely accurate. I don't think Jeter was "bad at defense." He was just not +10 at SS. There are a couple of plays that Jeter made that standout to me as showing outstanding defensive skill and situational awareness as well as athleticism. His issue is that he was not gifted with either the arm or the quickness to excel at SS. That coupled with the fact that A-Rod was a much better defensive SS than Jeter when A-Rod joined the MFYs makes me wonder is Jeter might have been a superb 2B or CF but was too stubborn to make the move. 
    • I think you need to give them a full season. Some of these guys will need to repeat because they are young for the level and just need lots of professional PAs.  Some will continue to fail, but the talented ones will keep getting chances for at least 700+PAs in A-ball.
    • Just didn't have the command. Middle-itis. Hopefully a one-off. 
    • Baumann has to be the one to go. I’m sure he’s a swell guy and all but he is not a major league pitcher. 
    • Once upon a time, Suarez was rated the 9th best prospect in the Appy League and as high as the 12th best prospect in the Rays system. He also did get parts of two seasons in the majors with the Giants. I know he's been bouncing around Japan and Korea for the past few years, but he wasn't completely off the radar earlier in his career. Reality may well catch up to him soon, but pitchers have weird trajectories sometimes.
    • I'm not a doctor, so if the O's are confident he is up to going back into the rotation as a full time starter, I suppose I will trust it. However, it makes sense to me to be conservative and manage his innings so he is in peak form in Sept/Oct. Of course, that takes for granted that we can get to the playoffs with him in a lesser role which may not be the case, but my inclination would be to stretch him out later rather than sooner.
    • All of that is fair to point out, some of which I did. My only issue with the snarkiness of the original comment like there was an over reaction going on by pointing out he's off to a disappointing start.  At the end of the day, Basallo is uber talented and he will figure it out. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...