Jump to content

Mandatory metal detectors at Camden Yards


crowmst3k!

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 188
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I never fire away at stupidity. I do not believe that you can properly assess risks to deter them well enough to be effective.

You gauge their effectiveness by counting the times security was breached and somebody was hurt or killed.

You never can archive 100% perfect security, but you put controls in place to reduce the risk and maximize the safety.

As with car alarms, it's not like they are infallible, but they make the thief rethink and move to an easier target.

last thing the MLB or NFL want, is a real-life Black Sunday event.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sidenote -- I travel a lot and have been approved for TSA precheck about 8 months ago. This is probably the best thing ever. I would hope they would open this program up to less frequest flyers as it makes the whole security process at an airport feel relaxed.

My wife and I also have Precheck (and Global Entry). It's worth every penny and then some. Although, as more people get it, the lines have gotten longer and slower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

Ben Franklin

Oh I know, even something as petty as an unalienable right.

I'm pretty sure there's no unalienable right to go to a baseball game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Camden Yards is secure enough. There are plenty of police officers all throughout the ballpark, equipped and trained to deal with any possible, highly unlikely scenarios.

The metal detector policy is ridiculous, intrusive. But, if it has to be implemented, let's do it in a way that is at least quick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

Ben Franklin

So, you see, folks, seat belts and speed limits are a bad idea. Ben Franklin said it, so it must be true!

I never understood why people believe that others should have the freedom to endanger others' lives. If someone wants to endanger themselves, I'm actually tempted to support them in that endeavour, since it would result in one more idiot being taken out of the gene pool. As long as it doesn't affect anyone else.

"Your right to swing your arms ends just where the other man's nose begins."

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure there's no unalienable right to go to a baseball game.

Bingo. Professional establishments on private property are as free to demand that you not carry weapons onto the premises, as you are free to "bear arms" on your own private property, or on public property.

Last I checked, Major League Baseball and the Orioles were not an arm of the government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure there's no unalienable right to go to a baseball game.

That is correct sir. It is such a privilege that our government allows this activity. So if you are going to participate in it, do whatever they say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sidenote -- I travel a lot and have been approved for TSA precheck about 8 months ago. This is probably the best thing ever. I would hope they would open this program up to less frequest flyers as it makes the whole security process at an airport feel relaxed.

I made my first ever trip on an airplane (round trip) earlier this year, and traveled with someone who is TSA Prechecked. I'm not, but they are. Rather than staying with me through the non-precheck security measures, they separated from me. I was a little indignant. :P However, it wasn't all that bad for me anyway. No rectal probes; they just made me take my shoes off and run a couple Xrays through me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bingo. Professional establishments on private property are as free to demand that you not carry weapons onto the premises, as you are free to "bear arms" on your own private property, or on public property.

Last I checked, Major League Baseball and the Orioles were not an arm of the government.

But, isn't the Maryland Stadium Authority, the owners of OPACY, part of the state government? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I made my first ever trip on an airplane (round trip) earlier this year, and traveled with someone who is TSA Prechecked. I'm not, but they are. Rather than staying with me through the non-precheck security measures, they separated from me. I was a little indignant. :P However, it wasn't all that bad for me anyway. No rectal probes; they just made me take my shoes off and run a couple Xrays through me.

Try flying in the middle east and Europe, when every passenger is hand screened before entering the plane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last post here, I promise:

The OP thread title says "Mandatory metal detectors".

Think about that for a moment.

In what world would optional metal detectors be in any way useful? Isn't that kind of redundant?

Let's see. If I were a criminal intending to use some weapon that would be caught by a metal detector, and they were present but merely optional, in what world would I voluntarily walk through the metal detector when I could enter the park another way not involving a metal detector?

:rofl:

And those blaming the government or the Orioles really have no idea: it's just the times we live in. It has nothing to do with the government or the Orioles. It was an MLB decision. If you really want to look for someone to blame, blame the several dozen or so people who have gone on mass violence rampages in densely packed areas (theaters, schools, college campuses, etc) over the past two decades or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I made my first ever trip on an airplane (round trip) earlier this year, and traveled with someone who is TSA Prechecked. I'm not, but they are. Rather than staying with me through the non-precheck security measures, they separated from me. I was a little indignant. :P However, it wasn't all that bad for me anyway. No rectal probes; they just made me take my shoes off and run a couple Xrays through me.

Hahah valid points but.... you must have never flown to Canada I presume...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • There’s a good chance McCann starts game one with Burnes. Big roster. We can always move Adley from DH to C late in the game. Lose the DH, but have a big enough bench to just pinch hit and double switch to hide the pitcher’s spot coming up.  So really we’d only be sacrificing 2 ABs from O’Hearn/Mounty/Kjerstad but we get Burnes throwing to his boy every pitch. 
    • We would have lost last night regardless due to zero runs scored by the offense. It is worrisome that Cano looked awful in back to back games. After talk about arm soreness. He has been the one reliable guy. Once we fell behind I don't really care how bad Bowman and Baker are. Hopefully they don't even make the roster for the playoffs. 
    • Don’t sleep on Povich getting a chance to eliminate the team that traded him away. That kind of stuff matters. The little extra…
    • I do worry about the McCann start although he has been hitting lately, so maybe you can justify it.
    • It’s the 7th inning with Burnes or Eflin on the bump. A tough lefty is coming up. Who you bringing in?  Perez or Coloumbe?  
    • My thoughts: - I agree that the Achilles heel is the bullpen and not the offense (especially with Westburg, Mountcastle, Urias, and Kjerstad back). - I also agree that Perez is overused in high leverage situations. This is going to come down to the degree you expect his “clutch” performance to be predictive going forward.  - I second the notion that most good bullpens are built with some degree of dumpster diving.  If you go back to offseason threads, there were not many desired bullpen FA targets (outside of unrealistic ones like Hader) that would have worked out well.  Maybe we haven’t “dumpster dived” well enough as evidenced by the success of Kaleb Ort in Houston. - Jacob Webb hasn’t been sharp since returning from the IL and Bowman has looked shaky his last few times out. - We don’t have a true closer, only a group of mostly effective set-up men in Dominguez, Cano, and Coulombe. - Part of me wishes they would be more aggressive with G-Rod and the Mountain. While we expect the team to continue to contend, you never really know how many times you’ll be back in the playoffs. However, I know in my head they are probably making the right decision. - I also feel like they should be auditioning McDermot, Selby, Young, or Strowd (who has been very good since August after rough Norfolk start). They could option Baker who I think is unlikely to have a path to trusted status after last year’s ALDS performance. This feeling may be mostly driven by dissatisfaction with the current state and wanting something better.  It might be unrealistic to expect options unproven at the MLB level to suddenly step in and be key playoff pieces.
    • Oh if we’re talking about what they will do, I can see it being something stupid like McCann at C and Adley at DH. I do think Mullins has enough veteranosity to outweigh Hyde’s obsession with L/R matchups. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...