Jump to content

Miguel Gonzalez Out Bud Norris In For Game Three


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>On Os rotation: this wasn't a last minute move. Norris has been preparing to start Game 3.</p>— Brittany Ghiroli (@Britt_Ghiroli) <a href="

">October 4, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Gonzalez was told earlier to be ready for game 3 but never told would definitely start. He's fine physically. Amused by confusion <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/orioles?src=hash">#orioles</a></p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="

">October 4, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lucas tweeted this

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/14L3HgU4uXo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

One of my candidates for favorite play of the year (regular season). Love the crotch grab at the end. Perfect pitch in a big spot against the best hitter in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/nPMi_Z6TqFQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Bud with 12 ks

I like Bud and am confident in him-but even with the 12 K's his team was trailing 4-0. It is amazing to me how people think that strikeouts are more important than not giving up runs/winning the game. In my opinion, this is not the best game to make a point about how great Bud is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bud hasn't pitched since 9/24 so maybe Buck is going with the more rested arm.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Norris hasn't pitched in a while and Buck doesn't want him going too long between outings</p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="
">October 4, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Bud and am confident in him-but even with the 12 K's his team was trailing 4-0. It is amazing to me how people think that strikeouts are more important than not giving up runs/winning the game. In my opinion, this is not the best game to make a point about how great Bud is.

But then would could just as easily argue that Bud doesn't control what happens to the ball after it is put in play, he can just limit the amount of times it is put in play. So 12 K's would be the best example of Bud. And Bud is going to give up about 4 runs a game on most good days. 12 K's probably guarantees that is all he is going to give up. So a performance like that would probably guarantee we get the best of Bud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But then would could just as easily argue that Bud doesn't control what happens to the ball after it is put in play' date=' he can just limit the amount of times it is put in play. So 12 K's would be the best example of Bud. And Bud is going to give up about 4 runs a game on most good days. 12 K's probably guarantees that is all he is going to give up. So a performance like that would probably guarantee we get the best of Bud.[/quote']

Of course, in this game he had given up 4 runs through 6 innings. Bud is clearly, in my opinion, quite capable of doing better than this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course, in this game he had given up 4 runs through 6 innings. Bud is clearly, in my opinion, quite capable of doing better than this.

Bud Norris doesn't even average 6 innings for us, and gives up 3.65 runs a game. I think you're expectations for Norris are a little unrealistic. He's basically a league average starter. If he gives us a full 6 innings tomorrow and only gives up 4 and strikes out 12, we should take that all day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Still a lot of things to shake out this year that IMO affects this decision.   1. Is Silent J the heir apparent to RF? 2. Is Beavers taking the next step and showing as a viable starting OF? 3. Is Fabian taking the next step to be a legit 4th OF who can play all 3 positions?   I will be very surprised if Taters is on the team next year. Honestly I think that if he is it will be due to failure of the young guys to show out. Good thing for us is we have enough of them that I don’t think that will happen.
    • He said after the game that he has five pitches, and if any three of them are working on a given night, he can mix them up enough to get batters out.  
    • He’s had quite the turnaround vs. LHP on this road trip.  Hopefully it continues all year!
    • Gunnar's definitely looking like the MVP of the Orioles and looks like priority #1 to me to get an extension. Burnes age works against him, because the O's maybe don't want to go longer than 5-6 years at most, but I could be wrong there. The Witt extension kind of set the parameters of what Gunnar will probably want at minimum. 2025 25 Kansas City Royals $8,111,111     2026 26 Kansas City Royals $14,111,111     2027 27 Kansas City Royals $20,111,111     2028 28 Kansas City Royals $31,111,111     2029 29 Kansas City Royals $36,111,111     2030 30 Kansas City Royals $36,111,111     2031 31 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2032 32 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2033 33 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2034 34 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2035 35 Kansas City Royals *$33,000,000   $33M Team Option 2036 36 Kansas City Royals *$28,000,000   $28M Team Option 2037 37 Kansas City Royals *$28,000,000   $28M Team
    • It is probably thin because of the short career lifespan is for those positions, which is why there is no way Mullins should be extended.
    • Gunnar Henderson's splits through first 97 ABs of the season:   Home -- .326 / .385 / .630 Away -- .294 / .362 / .667 Vs. LH -- .324 / .395 / .622 Vs. RH -- .300 / .358 / .667
    • I don't think the point was to trash Holliday but to question the reliability of the metric. I share the question about Holliday's OAA. He hasn't been bad but I can't think of a single plus play and OAA thinks he is the best defender on the team.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...