Jump to content

Good Camden Depot article on Brian Matusz


Frobby

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply
That's not just harsh, it's ridiculous. He was a consensus top 5 pick that year, so at the time it was completely justified. No real controversy there besides the normal "I think the guy taken at 6 was better than the guy taken at 3" stuff. Not even remotely close to a Hobgood, who some had as a late 1st rounder when he was taken in the top 10.

And even in retrospect, there are #1 overall picks in the last 10 years who have not/barely played in the majors, including several who've had plenty of time to progress through the minors. Tim Beckham, #1 overall out of that same draft class, has 8 MLB plate appearances despite spending most of the past four years in AAA.

Bleacher Report is consistently unimpressive.

I don't think they actually said he was the 7th worst pick, but that he was the 7th worst bust. It certainly was not a bad pick at the time.

Edit: they actually did say "worst draft busts (or decisions) of the past 10 years." Beckham was no. 5. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2074856-ranking-the-10-worst-mlb-draft-busts-of-decisions-of-the-past-10-years/page/11

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think they actually said he was the 7th worst pick, but that he was the 7th worst bust. It certainly was not a bad pick at the time.

Edit: they actually did say "worst draft busts (or decisions) of the past 10 years." Beckham was no. 5. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2074856-ranking-the-10-worst-mlb-draft-busts-of-decisions-of-the-past-10-years/page/11

I'm not entirely sure of their definition of bust, and they could probably make it anything they want. But I'm not sure Matusz is one of the worst 10 Oriole draft busts of the past decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Camden Depot article is wrong when it says this is Matusz' last arbitration year. He is also arbitration eligible after the 2015 season.

I agree with posters that say that 3-4m is too much for a Loogy but if MLBTR is correct that he will likely make 2.7m this coming season, I could live with that.

I think the determination of whether Matusz gets tendered or not is whether DD feels he can acquire a lefthanded reliever that can get out both lefties and righties. If DD can do that on his budget than Matusz is likely gone. But if DD can't then Matusz will be back as a Loogy again next year.

Budget vs finding a experienced lefty that can get out the best lefties in the games is the issue IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not entirely sure of their definition of bust, and they could probably make it anything they want. But I'm not sure Matusz is one of the worst 10 Oriole draft busts of the past decade.

Of course. Let's start with Tim Beckham. And follow up with Danny Hultzen or Barret Loux. I can go on of course. A career as a major league roster filler is more than most draft choices get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wasn't until this year that I heard that Brian has Asthma, and I think that explain a lot

1. Pitched well in college in San Diego (low humididty, low pollen, low pollution).

2. Always looked flushed on hot Baltimore days (Baltimore off the scale pollen, high humidity, high air pollution)

I have to wonder if the medical staff new about his Asthma when they drafted him to be a TOR starting pitcher in Baltimore.

I don't think BMat will ever be a successful starter but I think he would be better for a California, Arizona, or Texas team (not Houston)

Very good points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wasn't until this year that I heard that Brian has Asthma, and I think that explain a lot

1. Pitched well in college in San Diego (low humididty, low pollen, low pollution).

2. Always looked flushed on hot Baltimore days (Baltimore off the scale pollen, high humidity, high air pollution)

I have to wonder if the medical staff new about his Asthma when they drafted him to be a TOR starting pitcher in Baltimore.

I don't think BMat will ever be a successful starter but I think he would be better for a California, Arizona, or Texas team (not Houston)

I have read that pollen has become a real problem in Arizona. Apparently, retirees have brought their plants to the desert southwest with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course. Let's start with Tim Beckham. And follow up with Danny Hultzen or Barret Loux. I can go on of course. A career as a major league roster filler is more than most draft choices get.

The difference between Hultzen and Matusz is that Hultzen got hurt. Matusz simply hasn't performed to expectations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And Matusz could hang on for another decade or more as a LOOGY.

I hope he does. I hope he has Jake Arrieta type success in the NL. My comment was about how I'm not ready to call Hultzen a bust. Matt Bush on the other hand...

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Any jerk wad want to congratulate Duke Basketball or the Steelers? just go ahead and piss me off even more 
    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...