Jump to content

Nick Carfado


weams

Recommended Posts

I would rather give Miller 4/32 than Cruz 4/70.

For sure. We could maybe get 80+ innings out of Miller if used as a stopper. That's a lot of top-of-the-shelf high leverage innings. I'm more willing to bet that Miller has figured something out and will deliver close-to-advertised over 4 years than I am that Cruz will deliver close-to-advertised over 4 years. (And) I mean no disrespect to Cruz.

He did everything that anyone of us could possibly have imagined him doing to fulfill his end of our 2014 contract. The beauty is that he and the Orioles can go into 2015 with no hard feelings and in fact a feeling of good will. We both delivered. The O's put played him regularly and gave him his chance at redemption on the 2nd highest stage in baseball. He helped get us there for an incredible bargain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure but I tend to agree with Weams. I think they just decided to give Smyly a spot. 1) Verlander 2) Scherzer 3) Sanchez 4) Porcello 5) Smyly

made plenty of sense. They replaced Fister with the low salaried Smyly who they replaced with the high salaried Price.

Well they are really just replacing Scherzer with Price for 2015.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I'm with you. I don't understand why most people on here wouldn't be willing to give him that. He's possibly the best reliever in the game. 4/32 would be a steal IMO.

I'd give Miller that all day. He's the most dominant pitcher on the staff. He doesn't have to rely on his defense. Or a gimmick windeup. If Britton keeps the closer job over the next 3 years he's going to make an average of 7 million a year in 3 arbitration years. So you're telling me that Miller is only a million more. Dream scenario. Miller is a great backup plan as closer or any other role. We're not going to go out and sign an ace starter. So why not just have a dominant pen to hold the rotation together? Miller actually improves the rotation as well as the bullpen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd give Miller that all day. He's the most dominant pitcher on the staff. He doesn't have to rely on his defense. Or a gimmick windeup. If Britton keeps the closer job over the next 3 years he's going to make an average of 7 million a year in 3 arbitration years. So you're telling me that Miller is only a million more. Dream scenario. Miller is a great backup plan as closer or any other role. We're not going to go out and sign an ace starter. So why not just have a dominant pen to hold the rotation together? Miller actually improves the rotation as well as the bullpen.

What if Miller wants 10 million a year. What if he does?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if Miller wants 10 million a year. What if he does?

I love Miller and would love to have him back but nothing in DD history suggests to me that he is going to go all in on a RP

If there was one who would be worthy of consideration for doing that Miller kinda fits that bill. A LHP who can mow down RHB as easily as LHB. A guy who provides some insurance if your closer goes down etc...

That said there is a limit to what the value a guy has when you have some payroll limitations. I doubt that extends to 10 million a year. Much as I would love to see him back, I am sure DD would to but my guess is that the guy is as good as gone considering what his market is shaping up like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Thank you.  Not sure how easy for someone who may have been doing it for years and someone who’s been talented enough to make it work.   Someone posted a video of Freddie Freeman and Holliday to show similarities but, to me, it just showed how different their lead foot was.  Freeman’s was closed and perfectly in line and parallel to his back foot.  Hollidays foot pointed out and the foot towards 2B position.  I questioned it.  Other guys, who admittedly know more, said it was no problem.  Again, he might be able to become a HOF with those mechanics.  I’ve just never seen a good ML hitter hit that way. From that early January thread “I guess it depends on your definition of “step in the bucket”.  His stride foot definitely doesn’t go straight.  Pretty easy to see where his foot is in relation to the batters box and how much further away it is when it lands.  It doesn’t seem to affect him negatively though.  Interestingly enough, Freeman’s stride foot goes perfectly straight.” Edited January 6 by RZNJ
    • He allowed only one batted ball over 95 MPH, commanding his cutter particularly well in this one. I think the cutter is the most critical pitch for Povich to take the next step. He’s never had issues getting punch outs, he needs to be able to pitch in the zone without relying too much on his fastball. It’s also a key weapon against RHP - if you don’t have a true plus breaking ball or fastball that can overcome the platoon splits (which I don’t think Povich does), you can only make it as a LHP SP through the strength of your cutter and changeup, which are more reverse/neutral splits.  His changeup is probably not good enough to carry him on its own, so it’s the cutter that brings the whole pitch mix together.  
    • Agree he steps in the bucket. In theory should be a relatively easy fix. 
    • His back or shoulder might give out first. Hardly any talented pitcher retires without some sort of serious injury recorded.
    • Plus Member  30.8k Posted January 24 Aram Leighton from Just Baseball on Holliday “He has the tendency to pull off of the ball a bit with his front side, which can minimize his ability to use the ground and his lower half to generate more power, especially on pitches on the outer half. The move does not impede his ability to consistently make contact thanks to his adjustability and feel for the barrel. Holliday projects as an easy plus hitter with more juice to tap into.“ https://www.justbaseball.com/prospects/baltimore-orioles-top-15-prospects-for-2024/
    • I guess my point is that the difference between 91 and 93 at the MLB level is probably negligible.  I would put significant emphasis on pitch sequencing, command and control, and the ability to land his secondary pitches.  If I am recalling his repertoire correctly his most important pitch is his change up.  And it was his ability to effectively throw a breaking pitch, I think it was a Slider, that really ushered in his pre-injury success.  Now you can make the case that 2 miles per hours of fastball velocity may make the change up an even more effective pitch.  I would not argue with you about that aspect, however I am not certain it explains much about his previous success.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...