Jump to content

Right-Handed Power in the Outfield


weams

Recommended Posts

Is the value through the roof?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>?He?s going to be 36, has averaged 380 PA per year for three years, glove sliding?? "But he?s a right-handed power hitter in the outfield!"</p>— Eno Sarris (@enosarris) <a href="

">November 10, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Will Cruz GET 70?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the value through the roof?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>?He?s going to be 36, has averaged 380 PA per year for three years, glove sliding?? "But he?s a right-handed power hitter in the outfield!"</p>— Eno Sarris (@enosarris) <a href="

">November 10, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Will Cruz GET 70?

Loved having Cruz on this team. Last year he was a bargain @ 8 million and highly motivated to perform so he would be in the position he is in now.

He is going to be far from a bargain moving forward, at best he will cost you market value IMO and worst you will be overpaying for a guy who is 36 with sever defensive limitations and somewhat sketchy past when you take injuries, suspensions etc in to account as a whole.

I can see committing to that for maybe 2 years where you limit your exposure and hope he can produce at a level that approximates what he did last year. Beyond that though your asking for trouble and frankly dead money (big money one a guy who is not productive to that level). That is a situation a team like the O's need to avoid.

If we can get a deal with Nellie that suits us then great. If not then you have to let him walk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the value through the roof?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>?He?s going to be 36, has averaged 380 PA per year for three years, glove sliding?? "But he?s a right-handed power hitter in the outfield!"</p>— Eno Sarris (@enosarris) <a href="

">November 10, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Will Cruz GET 70?

BTW to answer your question...Yes I think some team might be inclined to give him say 4yrs and 70-75 million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do too.
What team? Not a NL team because he isn't a fulltime OF. SEA? They may have other fish to fry, like Martinez, or HanRam. To give Cruz 70M, the team would have to believe he is that one piece that puts them over the top. What team is that? DET? TEX? CLE?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Cruz.

I'd like to have him back for 3/40 tops.

If he signs elsewhere for big money, so be it. I have a feeling we won't see his 2014 numbers ever again, and in fact, his second half numbers are probably more likely what anyone will get from him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Cruz.

I'd like to have him back for 3/40 tops.

If he signs elsewhere for big money, so be it. I have a feeling we won't see his 2014 numbers ever again, and in fact, his second half numbers are probably more likely what anyone will get from him.

Significant 2nd half drop-offs are a big warning sign to me. When you have as hot a start as Cruz did it takes a very poor performance to really put a dent in it.

Cruz in the 2nd half - .249/.306/.463, they're not terrible numbers but you wouldn't rush out and pay 4/70M for a 35 year old with a 770 ops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Significant 2nd half drop-offs are a big warning sign to me. When you have as hot a start as Cruz did it takes a very poor performance to really put a dent in it.

Cruz in the 2nd half - .249/.306/.463, they're not terrible numbers but you wouldn't rush out and pay 4/70M for a 35 year old with a 770 ops.

But how do you explain his numbers in Sept. and the playoffs? Back on PED's?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Significant 2nd half drop-offs are a big warning sign to me. When you have as hot a start as Cruz did it takes a very poor performance to really put a dent in it.

Cruz in the 2nd half - .249/.306/.463, they're not terrible numbers but you wouldn't rush out and pay 4/70M for a 35 year old with a 770 ops.

I bet you wanna sign Nick to a 4 year deal too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But how do you explain his numbers in Sept. and the playoffs? Back on PED's?

No I don't think you need to drag anything like that into it. Baseball is a grind but you can still have good games mixed in with struggles. He basically underperformed all through June,July and August - 646/671/725, but seemed to get going in that last month. It's also difficult to know what goes into the performance for the playoffs, some players seem to be better in October consistently.

It's also worth noting that it's not like a 770 ops is bad - not great for a DH,but definitely above league average.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Baseball is a funny game sometimes, but you're right, we are going to battle with starters that were not even projected for the opening day rotation. Yet, here we are. Obviously anytime we have a series against the Yankees it's big, but even if we lose 2 of 3, we'd only be 2.5 games back.  The loss of Coulombe is huge and that bothers me more than the starters honestly. Perez, Akin, Baker and Tate filling key roles if Cano or Kimbrel is not available does not make me feel great. Baker threw the ball in his debut back and has been throwing well in AAA for a bit, so maybe he's a little bit of lightning in a bottle that this team needs in the pen.   
    • Count me in, but the Orioles have never really subscribed to that theory of splitting time like that. They really put an emphasis on everyday players and bench players with everyday players rarely getting days off.
    • I agree with this. I just feel like he hasn't been given a fair shot in two seasons up here. I can't see any reason that he can't start 4 games out of 7. Give Hays, Mullins, Santander and Cowser each one day off a week and let him start. 
    • This is probably obvious to many but I have not seen it talked about. With Bradish going on the IL and the recall of reliever Vespi they are now in a 5 man rotation.    Burnes, GRod, Irvin, Suarez and Povich.    And an 8 man pen. It was hoped that Kremer would join the rotation but his short 3 2/3 innings in Sunday's start at Norfolk probably means he gets another start in Norfolk on Friday.    If he does well at that point he could join the O's on June 26th.    Until then the O's are likely to continue with a 5 man rotation IMO.   Even if Kremer joins the rotation in June the O's probably go back to a 5 man rotation in July because of the number of off days in July.
    • Some may feel that way, but I'm wishing that they would have landed them both. Even before the injuries the starting pitching was going to be a little light next season... it's possibly going to be brutal now. Either way, I'm going to enjoy 24 before worrying about next season.
    • That barrel% regression is really surprising. I haven't looked into his repertoire or to see if there is some difference in how he's pitching, but that's a crazy drop off.  I wanted him and was willing to give up Westburg for him before the Burnes trade. I'm glad I'm not the Orioles GM now! lol Saying that, I do think the Orioles may have gotten a bit better out of him. Plus, out of those last seven starts, he's really only pitched poorly twice including the last game where he allowed seven runs to balloon his ERA.  With all the injuries we've head, I still wouldn't be upset with him in the rotation now. But if Suarez can keep it up and start getting through 6 more often, he's basically what we had hoped Cease would have been for us.
    • You've never really been a Stowers guy and have always put a huge emphasis on K-BB ratio. While I agree that K-BB ratio can be important, I believe you had misgivings with Mountcastle as he moved up the chain for the same reason. Stowers is always going to have a lot of miss, but he's not getting much regular playing time and pinch-hitting against relievers is not normally a time to work pitchers so I'm not surprised he's been more aggressive. I still think if Stowers was given 500 PAs he's going to hit 25-30 bombs and put up an OPS north of .780. And I think he's improved his defense enough that I would feel ok with him in LF in Camden Yards.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...