Jump to content

Caleb Joseph: just a backup, or plausible future starter?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

I think everyone here is pretty comfortable that Caleb Joseph can do a solid job as Matt Wieters' backup catcher in 2015. He played the majority of games after his call-up, earning more playing time (77 starts) than the more highly paid Nick Hundley (45). He controlled the running game well, and framed pitches well, though I think his pitch blocking left a bit to be desired. Overall, I think most of us would be comfortable with Joseph's defense even if he was the starting catcher.

So, I think the question is whether Joseph's defense is good enough to carry his offense as a starter, if Wieters leaves after the 2015 season. Joseph hit .207/.264/.354 last season. He ended the season in a horrific tailspin in which he finished 0 for 30 with 13 strikeouts. That sort of bookended the start of his season, in which he began the year 1 for 25. In between those bookends, he was a very credible .262/.311/.450.

Despite his offensive foibles, Joseph was worth 1.2 rWAR, 0.8 fWAR in 82 games. So, if Wieters leaves, are you comfortable rolling with Caleb as our starting catcher, or do we need to find a starter in the marketplace?

Side note: has anyone noticed that Syracuse's point guard is named Kaleb Joseph?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply
If the choice is giving Wieters a 6 or 7 year contract at whatever price Boras is demanding' date=' or taking the QO pick and and using that money to upgrade the team in other areas, I'd be fine with Joseph at the league minimum.[/quote']

This. ..I wouldn't tie up the Martin contact for Wieters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not at all comfortable with Joseph as the starter. I think his offense might settle in at a .650ish OPS for a few years, but he's not a +15 or +20 fielder. He's 29 next year, so it's not like we're counting on improvement. What you see is what you get. If the choice for 2016 is Wieters at 5/100 or 130 games of Joseph, I'll take whatever is behind door 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we're going to spend money on a starting pitcher like Scherzer or Lester then I'm totally fine letting Weiters walk, but otherwise sign that man. Caleb Joseph was awful towards the end of the season and in the playoffs. Besides that stretch where he hit the home runs, he didn't produce that much either. He's most certainly a backup

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see Joseph as more of a platoon guy primarily against LHP (which I think he may do fairly against for a few years) and provide plus defense. So, maybe 50-70 games and we'd need a LHB complement. In short, I think we can get production from the catcher position fairly cheaply (with Joseph as part of that mix) without having to make a huge outlay to Wieters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think everyone here is pretty comfortable that Caleb Joseph can do a solid job as Matt Wieters' backup catcher in 2015. He played the majority of games after his call-up, earning more playing time (77 starts) than the more highly paid Nick Hundley (45). He controlled the running game well, and framed pitches well, though I think his pitch blocking left a bit to be desired. Overall, I think most of us would be comfortable with Joseph's defense even if he was the starting catcher.

So, I think the question is whether Joseph's defense is good enough to carry his offense as a starter, if Wieters leaves after the 2015 season. Joseph hit .207/.264/.354 last season. He ended the season in a horrific tailspin in which he finished 0 for 30 with 13 strikeouts. That sort of bookended the start of his season, in which he began the year 1 for 25. In between those bookends, he was a very credible .262/.311/.450.

Despite his offensive foibles, Joseph was worth 1.2 rWAR, 0.8 fWAR in 82 games. So, if Wieters leaves, are you comfortable rolling with Caleb as our starting catcher, or do we need to find a starter in the marketplace?

Side note: has anyone noticed that Syracuse's point guard is named Kaleb Joseph?

I have seen a study that indicates that it is pretty much a one or the other deal. Great framers tend to be poor at blocking and vice versa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not at all comfortable with Joseph as the starter. I think his offense might settle in at a .650ish OPS for a few years, but he's not a +15 or +20 fielder. He's 29 next year, so it's not like we're counting on improvement. What you see is what you get. If the choice for 2016 is Wieters at 5/100 or 130 games of Joseph, I'll take whatever is behind door 3.

This is where I'm at, but would definitely go with Caleb for 130 if I had to choose between the two options.

Side note: Screw Syracuse. Hoya Saxa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have seen a study that indicates that it is pretty much a one or the other deal. Great framers tend to be poor at blocking and vice versa.

Yeah, trying to hold your glove on the corner to catch a ball off the the corner with the very top of the webbing is going to inevitably result in some passed balls when men are on base. Personally, I prefer the old school way. Block it any way you can when men are on base. Nobody on? Sure, go ahead and frame it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think everyone here is pretty comfortable that Caleb Joseph can do a solid job as Matt Wieters' backup catcher in 2015. He played the majority of games after his call-up, earning more playing time (77 starts) than the more highly paid Nick Hundley (45). He controlled the running game well, and framed pitches well, though I think his pitch blocking left a bit to be desired. Overall, I think most of us would be comfortable with Joseph's defense even if he was the starting catcher.

So, I think the question is whether Joseph's defense is good enough to carry his offense as a starter, if Wieters leaves after the 2015 season. Joseph hit .207/.264/.354 last season. He ended the season in a horrific tailspin in which he finished 0 for 30 with 13 strikeouts. That sort of bookended the start of his season, in which he began the year 1 for 25. In between those bookends, he was a very credible .262/.311/.450.

Despite his offensive foibles, Joseph was worth 1.2 rWAR, 0.8 fWAR in 82 games. So, if Wieters leaves, are you comfortable rolling with Caleb as our starting catcher, or do we need to find a starter in the marketplace?

Side note: has anyone noticed that Syracuse's point guard is named Kaleb Joseph?

I'll get back to you and answer this after I see how Wieters is next year following the Surgery. My gut says Caleb is just a nice backup at this point, but we really may have no choice Weiters may not end up being the guy he was before the surgery there's NO guarantee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not ready to pass judgement on Joseph at this point. He will be the O's backup in 2015. He progressed a lot in 2014 from what I can see and read. He probably can progress more.

I think Wieters with Boras will probably become a FA after the 2015 season and will probably ask for and get more money than the O's are willing to pay. So the O's will add a catcher for 2016. Who that catcher is and what his role will be is yet to be defined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I think Urias fits perfectly on next years team.    A decision has to be made on Ortiz or Westburg, unless they just don’t carry much value around the league, which is unlikely. Urias is a perfect back up IFer.  
    • I used the only information that’s available. If I did anything else it would no doubt be treated with accusations that I wouldn’t want to deal with. I did read an article that says the Wonderlic was replaced by it in 2022. There is no saying whether he took it or scored. BTW, Bryce Young scored 98% according to reports. While I like the Bama guy I think his height and light build are against him no matter how smart he is.
    • Just chipping in here on Urias... his power outage combined with defensive lapses of late (not to mention younger competition in house) have me ready to move on after this season. Potential payoff heroics might even sweeten the trade value instead of appetite to retain him. 
    • It was huge. I wasn't old enough to read it until about the 1980 version, but I'd check it out from the library every few weeks and probably read it cover to cover multiple times. It was there that I found things like Willie Keeler's .432 average in 1897, for the National League Baltimore Orioles, of all things. I think many people don't realize that before the McMillan Encyclopedia there was no single comprehensive source for this information. In many cases no source at all. You mention the Whos Whos in Baseball publications, but they only had active players. And I'm not sure how accurate they were, or how comprehensive. If you wanted to see who won the American League in 1907... I don't know. Or who won the 1922 batting title if you didn't have a stack of old Sporting News or Spalding Guides. There were some earlier books, like one called Daguerreotypes, but they were not well known or widely available or probably very accurate. I think it's true that when Ty Cobb retired he probably didn't know how many hits he actually had. When Babe Ruth started hitting homers some writer had to go dig around old guides and total stuff up to see if he was getting near some career record. The main reason a lot of HOF selections from before the 1970s were a little wacky was that the voters mostly were relying on 20 or 50 year old memories because they didn't have a reference. "Oh yea, I remember Bobby Wallace, the greatest shortstop... or was it third baseman... in the 1890s or something." That and the fantastically screwed up voting systems. The Encyclopedia was the beginning of the end of people who'd tell these long-winded stories of great feats of baseball from decades ago that were mostly not true. End of the Cliff Clavin era.
    • I’d say Tampa.    I don’t want to see Arozarena in a playoff series. Ever. He kills us and I’m sure he’d go off on a big stage.  Their pitching is really good.     
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...