Jump to content

Rey Navarro


Greg

Recommended Posts

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/orioles?src=hash">#orioles</a> still looking to stockpile plus-defenders at SS. Talks progressing with free-agent INF Rey Navarro and could get deal done.</p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="

">November 21, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Roch mentioned the other day there was interest in him. I looked him up then and thought he might be worth giving a major league contract to. If he as turned a corner offensively the past two seasons like his statistics indicate, then he looks like a potential major leaguer. That's the key. However, even if he is just a rangy shortstop with the ability to also play second base, that has its value has a depth move. I wouldn't label him as "just another defensive wiz" however. He's displayed good power the last two seasons. He's also not too old either.

Hope they can get it done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DD likes shortstops. Didn't he have Schoop play there even though his most likely position was 2B? I think that he feels that SS's are the most athletic of all the positions and they have the flexibilty to all positions at a pretty decent level. He must have loved Bert Campeneris (spelling???).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>To avoid confusion, <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/orioles?src=hash">#orioles</a> have not signed Rey Navarro to minor league deal. Parties may be discussing major league deal, per source.</p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="

">November 21, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That be ashame. Lombardozzi never got a fair shot. I'd rather cut Flaherty and keep Lombardozzi as the utilty guy.

Thankfully you're not running things. Flaherty would still be better than Lombardozzi even if he couldn't play SS and 3rd base (which he can).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After seeing Schoop turn the dp so effectively, none of us will like seeing anyone else attempt it. Least of all Lombardozi.

I like what I saw from Lomb when it came to effort, but I think we can do better just about everywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thankfully you're not running things. Flaherty would still be better than Lombardozzi even if he couldn't play SS and 3rd base (which he can).

Lambardozzi had all the shots I have ever needed to see. He was here in Harrisburg in Milb and he could not defend in the minors either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • There’s a good chance McCann starts game one with Burnes. Big roster. We can always move Adley from DH to C late in the game. Lose the DH, but have a big enough bench to just pinch hit and double switch to hide the pitcher’s spot coming up.  So really we’d only be sacrificing 2 ABs from O’Hearn/Mounty/Kjerstad but we get Burnes throwing to his boy every pitch. 
    • We would have lost last night regardless due to zero runs scored by the offense. It is worrisome that Cano looked awful in back to back games. After talk about arm soreness. He has been the one reliable guy. Once we fell behind I don't really care how bad Bowman and Baker are. Hopefully they don't even make the roster for the playoffs. 
    • Don’t sleep on Povich getting a chance to eliminate the team that traded him away. That kind of stuff matters. The little extra…
    • I do worry about the McCann start although he has been hitting lately, so maybe you can justify it.
    • It’s the 7th inning with Burnes or Eflin on the bump. A tough lefty is coming up. Who you bringing in?  Perez or Coloumbe?  
    • My thoughts: - I agree that the Achilles heel is the bullpen and not the offense (especially with Westburg, Mountcastle, Urias, and Kjerstad back). - I also agree that Perez is overused in high leverage situations. This is going to come down to the degree you expect his “clutch” performance to be predictive going forward.  - I second the notion that most good bullpens are built with some degree of dumpster diving.  If you go back to offseason threads, there were not many desired bullpen FA targets (outside of unrealistic ones like Hader) that would have worked out well.  Maybe we haven’t “dumpster dived” well enough as evidenced by the success of Kaleb Ort in Houston. - Jacob Webb hasn’t been sharp since returning from the IL and Bowman has looked shaky his last few times out. - We don’t have a true closer, only a group of mostly effective set-up men in Dominguez, Cano, and Coulombe. - Part of me wishes they would be more aggressive with G-Rod and the Mountain. While we expect the team to continue to contend, you never really know how many times you’ll be back in the playoffs. However, I know in my head they are probably making the right decision. - I also feel like they should be auditioning McDermot, Selby, Young, or Strowd (who has been very good since August after rough Norfolk start). They could option Baker who I think is unlikely to have a path to trusted status after last year’s ALDS performance. This feeling may be mostly driven by dissatisfaction with the current state and wanting something better.  It might be unrealistic to expect options unproven at the MLB level to suddenly step in and be key playoff pieces.
    • Oh if we’re talking about what they will do, I can see it being something stupid like McCann at C and Adley at DH. I do think Mullins has enough veteranosity to outweigh Hyde’s obsession with L/R matchups. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...