Jump to content

Okay so WHO do we spend the money on???

mskrulz

By mskrulz
in Orioles Talk

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply
weams Hangout Grand Counsel

weams

Posted
Posted
Sorry Most reports had all Oriole arbitration eligible players getting tender. Then When Cruz left we heard Orioles OK with 3 years around 40m. Nick left we heard Orioles good with 4 years 40 or 3 years 33m.

So if you ask me the Orioles got 75m to spend.

I really enjoy you. The payroll will be under 125 million. They made Hardy defer some of his money. Just who do you cheer for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
I really enjoy you. The payroll will be under 125 million. They made Hardy defer some of his money. Just who do you cheer for?

I'm OK with a 125m payroll but i bet it doesn't get to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
weams Hangout Grand Counsel

weams

Posted
Posted
Our old twitter pal incarcerated bob has orioles and mariners with offers out for melky.

He's not a pal. He is an awful liar. And he steals from unsuspecting degenerate gamblers. Leaving their children hungry. Think of the children before you post about him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
Good Lord. You honestly have no idea what you're talking about. I'm sad for you. Do you really not grasp the difference between 2015 dollars and total commitment? I'd guess the Orioles have more than 75M total commitment dollars to spend. Hey, if a player was willing to take 3M per yr yearly for the next30 years, I bet we'd do that in a heartbeat. Problem is that that has next to nothing to do with what we are willing to spend in 2015. I'd guess we've got 10-15M 2015 dollars left.

Like i said before not signing them= 20m to spend in 2015 and 75m total. Nice Job being a you know what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TonySoprano Hangout Grand Counsel

TonySoprano

Posted
Posted
Good Lord. You honestly have no idea what you're talking about. I'm sad for you. Do you really not grasp the difference between 2015 dollars and total commitment? I'd guess the Orioles have more than 75M total commitment dollars to spend. Hey, if a player was willing to take 3M per yr yearly for the next30 years, I bet we'd do that in a heartbeat. Problem is that that has next to nothing to do with what we are willing to spend in 2015. I'd guess we've got 10-15M 2015 dollars left.
$15M covers the QO to Cruz alone. Add another $10M for Markakis. I doubt it was an either/or situation with the two, nor do I think that was the end of our shopping list. Having said that, I don't think we'll add $25M to the 2015 payroll this offseason. Dan will hold back some cash for midseason moves.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
brianod All-Star

brianod

Posted
Posted

Cruz is old and coming off a career year. He is a below average fielder and will get worse over the course of his contract. Nick needs neck surgery and has slowed down considerably, making his next four years very iffy. Miller is coming off a career year where he missed a week or so due to a toe injury that sidelined him the year before. It's great not to overpay but the bottom line is that if we want to compete, we need to replace those players. We can't do that without taking chances. Aoki, Rasmus, etc won't do it. We need to replace impact players with impact players. We are set in the infield with Manny, Hardy, Schoop and Davis. We are set in cf with Jones. So, we have three positions to look for. LF, RF and DH. Luckily for us, DH seems to be the easiest position to fill. We can use Pierce, Lough, DeAza to fill one of the outfield positions. So, as I look at it, we need two positions. A DH and an OF. This isn't that hard. Where DD will earn his money this off season is to determine the biggest impact at those positions at the lowest price. I don't think you will get impact without taking a chance, it's time to go for it.

My question is, who do we go for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
El Gordo Hangout Grand Counsel

El Gordo

Posted
Posted
Like i said before not signing them= 20m to spend in 2015 and 75m total. Nice Job being a you know what.
As we stand right now BBR has us at 115 M after arbitration and adding player to fill out the roster. My guess we have another 10 M to play with.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

Orioles News and Information
Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2022 Top 75 Prospects

Statistics

2022 Orioles Stats

2022 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats


  • Posts

    • turtlebowl
      ALDS First Pitch - game start time

      By turtlebowl · Posted

      I would be shocked if we don't have the 1:05 game on Saturday. As far as Sunday goes, Fox 1 already has the times listed but not the matchups.  Looks like either 4:05 or 8:05 game time.  I would expect it to be 4:05 because the Rangers if they win wouldn't go against the Cowboys game that night.  If Tampa wins, I don't see the O's - Tampa matchup being the primetime game. 
    • Aristotelian
      Trevor Bauer

      By Aristotelian · Posted

      The term used in the MLB policy is "just cause". It does say burden of proof is on MLB, except it goes back to the player in the event they already have a criminal conviction: https://content.mlb.com/documents/2/9/2/296982292/Major_League_Player_Joint_DV_SA_CA_Policy_English_2018.pdf Burden of Proof. In any case involving discipline imposed under this Policy, the Commissioner’s Office shall have the burden of proving that the Player committed a Covered Act: a. A criminal conviction for an offense involving a Covered Act or a plea of guilty, no contest or nolo contendere, to an offense involving a Covered Act, whether a misdemeanor or felony, shall satisfy the Commissioner’s Office’s burden of proving a violation. In cases involving a criminal conviction or a plea of guilty, no contest or nolo contendere, the burden shall be on the Player to establish that notwithstanding the conviction or plea, the Player did not engage in a Covered Act. b. A Player may be subjected to disciplinary action for just cause by the Commissioner for a violation of this Policy in the absence of a conviction or a plea of guilty to a crime involving a Covered Act. Apparently just comes out of labor and employment law. Basically, it appears analogous to the process when an employer fires a union employee and is handled through a similar arbitration process. I'm not clear from the wikipedia page how it compares to "beyond a reasonable doubt" but I assume it is somewhat lesser than that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_cause_(employment_law)
    • Sports Guy
      Will DL Hall replace Bautista in 2024?

      By Sports Guy · Posted

      Yea, I don’t feel he has a high floor. His floor is DFA by June. That’s very possible although I would agree I don’t think it’s likely. To be clear, I’m more than happy to have him on the team in 2024. He has been excellent this year. I’m just saying a fall off shouldn’t be seen as improbable and his standing on the team shouldn’t effect how they view Hall’s role.
    • baltfan
      Trevor Bauer

      By baltfan · Posted

      One more thing.  In the video Bauer says he never committed any act of violence towards this woman or anyone else.  If that is true, he should have been flummoxed when he was accused by her of bruising her.  Instead, he says he "feels bad that it happened."  There seems to be more to all of this than what we are seeing.     
    • cnmilton
      Orioles could have 3 picks before the 2nd round

      By cnmilton · Posted

      Depending on how many teams exceeded the salary ceiling, the Orioles could be picking a couple picks higher than expected.
    • Sports Guy
      ALDS First Pitch - game start time

      By Sports Guy · Posted

      Having the game at 4:00 on Saturday is going to be a disaster down there.
    • btdart20
      Will DL Hall replace Bautista in 2024?

      By btdart20 · Posted

      You may have been over this before.  But I don't remember 100% of what someone else posts.  Anyway, thanks for humoring me. I don't think we're far off actually.  Especially regarding Hall not being blocked by Coulombe.  I do agree that the sample size is small enough to add a lot of variation.  I suppose the difference is that I believe there's more stability than you do (i.e. a higher floor).  You hint at the reason why with "It's the Wall" wrt his HR rate.  The CB is the key to the chase% and swingstr%.  

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...