Jump to content

Dan's Mistakes


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply
If you want to get that technical about it his absurd post respond to mine actually said "less than zero percent chance,"which isn't just an exaggeration but is actually mathematically impossible. Yet you defend him? Aren't you waaay smarter than that? I sure think you are!

You made a stupid post, I called you out on it. Get over it. Sure there is like a 1% chance that he is so bad he has to be released, like Drungo pointed out, but the likelihood of that occurring would take a whole bunch of stars coming into alignment. He has a much better chance of being above average than being released, the opposite of which you stated. It is a lot easier to hide a pitcher than a position player and the team would keep him for at least 2016 to try to figure out whatever was wrong or let whatever hidden injury heal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you would have paid Wada more to pitch in relief (something he didn't do with us)? That sounds like a Dan's mistake in the making.

He was signed to a minor-league contract by the Cubs so I don't think he was paid more than Matusz's $2.4M. It's surprising we were willing to make minor-league deals with Johan but not Wada - perhaps he just wanted a change of scenery (maybe annoyed he didn't get an opportunity in 2013? )

Though I don't know that I would agree replacing Matusz with him makes sense - Matusz was coming off a very reasonable 2013 and at his salary was a good left-handed option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was signed to a minor-league contract by the Cubs so I don't think he was paid more than Matusz's $2.4M. It's surprising we were willing to make minor-league deals with Johan but not Wada - perhaps he just wanted a change of scenery (maybe annoyed he didn't get an opportunity in 2013? )

Though I don't know that I would agree replacing Matusz with him makes sense - Matusz was coming off a very reasonable 2013 and at his salary was a good left-handed option.

Or it could be that they had an excellent first hand look at him and didn't think his stuff would play.

My guess is the velocity he was showing last season wasn't there when he was pitching in the minors for the O's or he would have at least warranted a look when rosters expanded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was signed to a minor-league contract by the Cubs so I don't think he was paid more than Matusz's $2.4M. It's surprising we were willing to make minor-league deals with Johan but not Wada - perhaps he just wanted a change of scenery (maybe annoyed he didn't get an opportunity in 2013? )

Though I don't know that I would agree replacing Matusz with him makes sense - Matusz was coming off a very reasonable 2013 and at his salary was a good left-handed option.

This. Saying Wada could have replaced Matusz on the roster for 2014 doesn't make much sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You made a stupid post, I called you out on it. Get over it. Sure there is like a 1% chance that he is so bad he has to be released, like Drungo pointed out, but the likelihood of that occurring would take a whole bunch of stars coming into alignment. He has a much better chance of being above average than being released, the opposite of which you stated. It is a lot easier to hide a pitcher than a position player and the team would keep him for at least 2016 to try to figure out whatever was wrong or let whatever hidden injury heal.

Actually Drungo stated 2% not 1% so yet AGAIN you are wrong, you are on a roll! Just watch calling me out for "absurd" posts which were merely my opinion anyway, simply because you disagree by making multiple statements for all to see that are factually incorrect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually Drungo stated 2% not 1% so yet AGAIN you are wrong, you are on a roll! Just watch calling me out for "absurd" posts which were merely my opinion anyway, simply because you disagree by making multiple statements for all to see that are factually incorrect.

Not really wrong if I assign my own valuation to the situation. But keep up the good work of showing why no one listens to what you have to say. And yes, I am so incorrect because the difference between 0, 1, and 2 is soo much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really wrong if I assign my own valuation to the situation. But keep up the good work of showing why no one listens to what you have to say. And yes, I am so incorrect because the difference between 0, 1, and 2 is soo much.

I am convinced he just wants to argue and make a fool of himself. I'd recommend ignoring myself rather than getting worked up. Not worth the effort. And nothing of substance to miss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really wrong if I assign my own valuation to the situation. But keep up the good work of showing why no one listens to what you have to say. And yes, I am so incorrect because the difference between 0, 1, and 2 is soo much.

You continue to miss the point sadly as even when you were factually wrong twice, and admitted as much you minimize your errors while "calling" me out for a stupid post when I merely expressed my opinion and made no factual mis statements. Seem a bit unfair, biased, and mean spirited to me to say the least!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...