Jump to content

Four Trades for a World Series

srobby08

By srobby08
in Orioles Talk

Recommended Posts

weams Hangout Grand Counsel

weams

Posted
Posted
That's what's amazing with the people on this board. One person says we should turn off the fair trades button to ban

proposals that are not fair ... You can't evaluate trades player by player.

Yes you can. We do and there is no button.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
weams Hangout Grand Counsel

weams

Posted
Posted
That's what's amazing with the people on this board. One person says we should turn off the fair trades button to ban

proposals that are not fair because Altuve for Schoop is not fair and another says that Altuve is overrated and we would

be getting the shaft because Bundy is much to much to give for Altuve. The ENTIRE trade is what we need to look at.

We get a lead off hitter who led the league in hits and can steal bases, we get an outfielder who can easily replace the

numbers we had in right field last year and we get a catcher that allows us to trade Wieters (since we are not going to

re-sign him) to get another big bat. When Billy Beane makes a "bad" trade everyone cuts him slack saying watch what

else happens. You can't evaluate trades player by player.

I would suggest that you refrain from calling out all people on "this board."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LayzieDES Major Leaguer Rising Star

LayzieDES

Posted
Posted
That's what's amazing with the people on this board. One person says we should turn off the fair trades button to ban

proposals that are not fair because Altuve for Schoop is not fair and another says that Altuve is overrated and we would

be getting the shaft because Bundy is much to much to give for Altuve. The ENTIRE trade is what we need to look at.

We get a lead off hitter who led the league in hits and can steal bases, we get an outfielder who can easily replace the

numbers we had in right field last year and we get a catcher that allows us to trade Wieters (since we are not going to

re-sign him) to get another big bat. When Billy Beane makes a "bad" trade everyone cuts him slack saying watch what

else happens. You can't evaluate trades player by player.

Yeah, so the fair trade button was a reference to video games...again suggesting that this would be the only place these scenarios would actually happen (they would get rejected in MLB The Show also). Hope that clears it up.

Walker for Moss isn't terrible though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
weams Hangout Grand Counsel

weams

Posted
Posted
Yeah, so the fair trade button was a reference to video games...again suggesting that this would be the only place these scenarios would actually happen (they would get rejected in MLB The Show also). Hope that clears it up.

Walker for Moss isn't terrible though.

Some national guys think Walker can be our long term first baseman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing


  • Posts

    • DrungoHazewood
      Walltimore

      By DrungoHazewood · Posted

      I love the wall. Love it. I think every Major League ballpark should have dimensions like that. By and large teams build parks with much smaller dimensions than a century ago, despite the players being dramatically bigger, stronger, faster athletes. It makes no sense. The game would be improved with much larger outfields. It would emphasize speed and athleticism over endless lineups of slow sluggers.
    • Safelykept
      Hyde: No Idea if Suarez Will Be Back

      By Safelykept · Posted

      Yes, so hes a FA, the Discussion should now turn to what Elias or anybody else might offer next year. and it's tough because at 34 he's almost a one year wonder. But I do know this our season came back from trouble all year and Big Al was there to help many times. 
    • Sanity Check
      JD Martinez

      By Sanity Check · Posted

      We all know you think you're passionate about your team and your ideas. but the way you continually insult people whose ideas you don't agree with, or who disagree with you, is incredibly childish.   It's a form of cyber-bullying.   I'd like to think you're better than that, and wonder why more people don't call you out on it.  Maybe they know it won't change anything? Is it not possible to disagree without having to insult either the person or their thoughts?  I know it's hard to self-reflect and realize that you constantly do this, and maybe make a change for the better, but I kind of expect some insults are now headed my way for trying to make this place a bit less hostile.  
    • OsFanSinceThe80s
      Rubenstein Article

      By OsFanSinceThe80s · Posted

      We'll see Rubenstein talks a good game, but actions speak louder than words. Also it's on Elias to be willing to make a splash if the right (but also pricey) player become available and wants to be an Oriole. I was never big on an Adley extension even last year with the way catchers age. Gunnar is a player you absolutely lock up to an early contact extension assuming he is even open to it.
    • Can_of_corn
      JD Martinez

      By Can_of_corn · Posted

      I think for almost all owners payroll matters more than winning. Even teams like the Yankees are careful with how they go into penalty.
    • Aristotelian
      Hyde: No Idea if Suarez Will Be Back

      By Aristotelian · Posted

      For sure. That's why the Hyde quote implies he is a free agent.
    • forphase1
      JD Martinez

      By forphase1 · Posted

      Who really cares what the payroll is?  And if you do,  why?  If we hadn't been swept out of the playoffs would we even be arguing this?  In the end the amount the Os pay isn't the issue or problem.  It's how the team performs on the field.  Sure we all know that payroll and wins have a fairly strong correlation to each other,  but it isn't exact or perfect at all.   Should we increase payroll?  Sure,  provided you makes the team better.  But increasing the payroll while not improving the team by doing so seems goofy.   Sign a #1 or #2, absolutely.   Move on from the platoon at 1st with a guy who can take up one roster spot and hit both rhp and lhp,  like Walker?  Sign me up.  Sign an impact OF and split at bats between Mullins, Cowser, Kjerstad and him?  Sounds good to me.   Replace Mountcastle with just a more expensive version of the same?  What's the point?  Sign an expensive pitcher to replace Povich with the same results?  Why,  other then a depth move?  I'm all for signing free agents and spending money,  just do it wisely and don't do it just to say we signed someone.   Actually improve the team or stand pat.  Making moves just to make moves is how you end up with Rogers types. Payroll matters, yeah.   But winning matters more.   If we can win with a 100M payroll, fine.   If it needs to be 200M to win,  that's fine with me too.  Just win games,  and let the window we have stay open as long as possible... and most importantly win the WS for the first time since 1983.  

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...