Jump to content

Toronto looking for New President to be Duquette.


OriolesManiac88

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Remember when the Orioles were a joke for hiring this guy?

And wasn't it Rosenthol leading the charge about what a terrible choice Duquette was and describing in detail how the Blue Jays Assistant GM turned the job down to due to Angelos?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since apparently Duquette is the only person on the planet qualified for this Toronto CEO position I expect them to pay dearly for it. I accept nothing less than a top, major league ready prospect. If Toronto balks they can hire someone else. This whole situation is ridiculous. Toronto sought permission to interview Duquette. Permission was denied. Toronto should move on. IMHO, the only reason they haven't is they want to stick it to the Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The most telling thing to me is that Duquette has not made a strong statement like, "I'm an Oriole and I will be an Oriole for as long as Mr. Angelos wants me" or something similar. The lack of a statement by Duquette strongly suggests that he is very interested in the position and wants his name to remain attached to the position. I think that's probably the "toxin" Roch referenced.

Yes he did. During a interview with Hot Stove I believe.

He said that he was committed to seeing his contract with the Os through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay dude, don't be pedantic. What he means is that it is perfectly reasonable for an individual to want a promotion. DD isn't out of line by reasonable standards.

The reason that teams give GM's 4 year extensions so they don't leave during that time. If they didn't care if you left year to year you would be like the Rays and not offer multi-year contracts for GM's and Coaches. And DD was under contract at the time he signed the extension. If he thought he might leave in a couple of years he could have turned down the extension and kept getting paid for 2 more years and then decided whether to re-up with the Orioles.

Anyway like I said before this isn't a promotion. Titles are meaningless. In either case he would be the top baseball guy with the club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've come around on this. Because of my love for Dan, it's probably best to let him go if he wants that.

Has the Jays organization contaminated our pool? Yes.

Has Ken written some extremely misleading stuff that has fanned flames, further contaminating our org? Definitely.

Would this move be a major life change for Duq? Sounds like it.

Would I rather he forever be or guy? Certainly.

Would I want him to not get what he wants, though? No.

Do I require the Jays to pay a kings ransom for someone who's value is at an all-time high, and who has 4 more years on a contact to us, and who would be going to a division rival? You bet your sweet bippy.

Listen to their offers until they send one that is extremely painful for them.

This was real dirty pool by a number of guys. I'll not happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes he did. During a interview with Hot Stove I believe.

He said that he was committed to seeing his contract with the Os through.

I think he needs to make a much more definitive statement if that is his real intent. Especially since the media (and there's not much else to cover baseball wise right now) are stirring the pot. I know definitive statements are not DD's forte, but if he wants to stay then he should make it really clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since apparently Duquette is the only person on the planet qualified for this Toronto CEO position I expect them to pay dearly for it. I accept nothing less than a top, major league ready prospect. If Toronto balks they can hire someone else. This whole situation is ridiculous. Toronto sought permission to interview Duquette. Permission was denied. Toronto should move on. IMHO, the only reason they haven't is they want to stick it to the Orioles.
This is what infuriates me about this "process." Can't they look to raid more than one front office or is the screw only being put to the Orioles?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think this is quite an apples-to-apples comparison with the Epstein move as some would like to make it out to be. Epstein jumped leagues; this is an intradivision move.

I think the Red Sox had soured on Epstein at that point anyway. They had missed the playoffs two straight seasons and the September collapse had happened with the players deemed out of control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he needs to make a much more definitive statement if that is his real intent. Especially since the media (and there's not much else to cover baseball wise right now) are stirring the pot. I know definitive statements are not DD's forte, but if he wants to stay then he should make it really clear.

January 31, 2015. Fan Fest. If nothing has happened before then, believe me, he's going to get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason that teams give GM's 4 year extensions so they don't leave during that time. If they didn't care if you left year to year you would be like the Rays and not offer multi-year contracts for GM's and Coaches. And DD was under contract at the time he signed the extension. If he thought he might leave in a couple of years he could have turned down the extension and kept getting paid for 2 more years and then decided whether to re-up with the Orioles.

Anyway like I said before this isn't a promotion. Titles are meaningless. In either case he would be the top baseball guy with the club.

I think that's baloney.

I also think people are underestimating the potential that DD is frustrated with the O's. All the evidence suggests that the O's are being extremely tightfisted with the budget. 99.99% of sports executives would love to have a larger budget. The O's have lost significant players this offseason and have replaced them with marginal players, even though all evidence suggests that the O's could invest significantly more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that's baloney.

I also think people are underestimating the potential that DD is frustrated with the O's. All the evidence suggests that the O's are being extremely tightfisted with the budget. 99.99% of sports executives would love to have a larger budget. The O's have lost significant players this offseason and have replaced them with marginal players, even though all evidence suggests that the O's could invest significantly more.

I disagree with this. Although neither of us have evidence, I believe DD is the one that chose not to bring back Cruz, Markakis and Miller due to not getting value for them. I also believe he has not seen value for the dollar out there on the FA market. I do not believe Angelos stopped him from resigning either of these players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Hm, seems like perfect situation for Akin as an opener, maybe game 3 if necessary? 
    • You are such a Rebel.
    • Another possibility: If you win game 1, maybe you don't ptich Eflin in Game 2 and try to win Game 2 without using him.   I mean, worst that can happen is you lose and have Eflin for game 3 anyway.   So you won't lose the wild card series without pitching your two best. But you COULD win the wild card series without your two best, and then you would have Eflin and Burnes lined up for games 1 and 2 in Cleveland
    • I like Law a lot, but that is a beyond asinine comment about not playing every day on a playoff team. You know how many playoff teams would slot him in the lineup immediately every game? Answer: the large majority. The Yankees would take Cowser over Verdugo The Tigers might not put him in over Greene/Meadows/Carpenter, but they’d DH him over their options. Cowser would start over every outfielder for the Royals, IMHO. He’d start over Meyers and Dubon for the Astros. The Guardians would probably start him over anybody not named Kwan in the OF, tbh.  I can keep going.
    • Even more of a reason to like FG over BBref,  tbh. Thanks, didn’t realize they switched this year. My point re: FIP is that I rather prefer it over RA/9, not to say it’s perfect. RA/9 treats all runs allowed by a pitcher the same regardless of them being earned or unearned. So, a pitcher on a team with a terrible defense is going to be judged much more harshly than somebody that pitches on a top tier defense. Not to mention the bullpen taking over mid inning dilemma. The funny thing is in your example re: FIP, RA/9 would have the first pitcher but love the second. Either way, these stats, like nearly all single solitary stats, aren’t best taken alone.  For your example, let’s say Pitcher A allowed weak contact and the defenders just had poor range, poor arms, whatever, but in the second example the defenders had great range and great arms making amazing plays to prevent any damage…then what?  Anyways, give me FIP over RA/9 was my point. But if you want to truly assess a pitcher, you’re going to need a few complimentary stats to go along with it.  
    • Really zooming the microscope in on one game with Tarik Skubal, would you consider batting Austin Slater 3rd or 4th to basically pinch hit in the 1st inning, and then replace him in LF with Cowser in the top of the 2nd inning. A tactic that might look good to the SIGBOT but could freak out actual ballplayers.
    • It would make sense. I think there are four possibilities for not announcing Eflin yet: 1. It’s going to be Eflin, we’re just waiting to announce to make it harder for Tigers/Royals to prepare. 2. Hyde and FO are discussing whether to slot Eflin for game 3 to possibly save him for ALDS game 1. 3. Hyde and FO are discussing a possible opener strategy for game 2. 4. Eflin has some minor aches/pains/soreness so we’re delaying the announcement to make sure he will be healthy enough. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...