Jump to content

Toronto looking for New President to be Duquette.


OriolesManiac88

Recommended Posts

The Jays have handled this in a completely classless manner.

Sure inquire, but when rebuffed that should pretty much be it. I get the feeling that proper channels have not been followed and the Jays have allowed this to be played out in the media.

At the same time, common courtesy in professional sports leagues is to allow a coach or front office person to interview for a promotion. Lets not act like the Orioles are saints here either by refusing to let Duquette go if he wants to get a promotion. I think Angelos is being a big possessive and selfish here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
At the same time, common courtesy in professional sports leagues is to allow a coach or front office person to interview for a promotion. Lets not act like the Orioles are saints here either by refusing to let Duquette go if he wants to get a promotion. I think Angelos is being a big possessive and selfish here.

Has any team ever offered a promotion to another team's GM before? I mean it is fine and dandy when you are talking about a scout or a pitching coach but a GM?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the same time, common courtesy in professional sports leagues is to allow a coach or front office person to interview for a promotion. Lets not act like the Orioles are saints here either by refusing to let Duquette go if he wants to get a promotion. I think Angelos is being a big possessive and selfish here.

They asked for permission, they were denied permission, they still harped. Angelos just made a four-year commitment to the man, how would it look to the fans if Angelos allowed the GM that many hold up as responsible for getting the Orioles back to the postseason a chance to leave to a division rival?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://m.mlb.com/bal/video/topic/7417714/v37038769/dan-duquette-joins-hot-stove

Here's a long interview on Hot Stove on Decebmer 9. The questions comes up about Toronto. There is nothing in that interview where he comes close to saying he's committed to staying with the Orioles and not interested in the Toronto job. He just says that there is work to do to make the O's better and he's focused on that. Maybe you are talking about a different interview? If so, I'm sure we'd love to get the link.

Duquette appeared on MLB Network Radio (Twitter links/audio link) and told hosts Jim Bowden and Jim Duquette, “I’m with the Orioles. I’m here to represent the Orioles at the meetings. Other than that, I have nothing to add. I do have a contract and I’ve always honored my contract.

Link: http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2014/12/blue-jays-eyeing-dan-duquette.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They asked for permission, they were denied permission, they still harped. Angelos just made a four-year commitment to the man, how would it look to the fans if Angelos allowed the GM that many hold up as responsible for getting the Orioles back to the postseason a chance to leave to a division rival?

Denying permission is where the issue came up though. Personally, I think Angelos has handled this whole thing terribly. I believe he should have allowed him to interview and discuss compensation if he's hired, like with Theo Epstein. Acting like a child by saying over and over again "He's mine! He agreed to stay here so he's mine! You can't have him!" is the worst way to handle this and makes the Orioles organization look bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some naive takes in this thread IMO.

My take:

- I don't know how this is "new" as Roch reported on it several weeks ago.

- Typical Rosenthal slant on it which I think undermines him completely

- While I don't think the Jays have talked directly to DD or his representation, they must know through intermediaries that he is interested.

- The way these things typically work is that someone on the Orioles side, probably an Angelos, is contacted by the BJ. He then goes to DD to see if he has interest because it isn't tampering for the Orioles to ask that question. It will only proceed to discussing compensation with the BJ if DD says that he is seriously interested. Then, the real negotiations for compensation take place. The Angelos handling the negotiation will use DD and his staff to determine appropriate compensation so all of this is being done with DD's knowledge.

- It wouldn't surprise me if Angelos was surprised at DD's level of interest when they approached him and that has led to some hard feeelings. PGA has a serious issue with not feeling wanted and letting that get to him.

- I would say this does have legs, but I also wouldn't be surprised if the compensation requested is viewed as outlandish by the BJ. It remains to be seen if a compromise can be reached if that is the case.

- Even if all of this is going on, DD is still working hard and doing everything he can for this organization. There is just no way a guy like him acts differently than that. No way.

My thoughts

Well put. I think that is a very accurate interpretation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Denying permission is where the issue came up though. Personally, I think Angelos has handled this whole thing terribly. I believe he should have allowed him to interview and discuss compensation if he's hired, like with Theo Epstein. Acting like a child by saying over and over again "He's mine! He agreed to stay here so he's mine! You can't have him!" is the worst way to handle this and makes the Orioles organization look bad.

I'm not sure I agree with this. DD is under contract for a long while and all of this didn't surface until right at Winter Meetings. If this had gone down right at the beginning of the offseason or if DD only had a year left on his contract, I think Angelos would be coming off as more childish. As it stands, though, DD (potentially) and Toronto's timing is terrible and tacky. It's the difference between leaving your wife after the kids are mostly grown and leaving her right you've gotten her pregnant.

To be clear, though, I think DD is a professional and will do his job regardless of whether or not he'd prefer to be in Toronto.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The part I might disagree with is that I think the O's bargaining position for compensation is stronger with the way Angelos has handled this, right or wrong.

The little bit better compensation we might get doesn't make up for the image Angelos is once again reinforcing around the league as a terrible boss to work for. Who would want to sign on to be our GM in the future if they have any kind of aspirations of something better?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't really seem like they are the ones doing anything here. Toronto is the org that is stirring the pot.

I don't know.. It seems like there is more to all of this than just Toronto stirring the pot. Anyway, whether this is their fault or not, it still seems like I am watching thirty clowns get in a car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally think the way Toronto has handled this is extremely improper. They have their CEO in limbo. They have not renewed his contract which expired in October, but have allowed him to continue to work on the job "paycheck to paycheck". If you want someone else, fire the man and let him know what's going down. You then approach Peter about DD. Peter says "No". Professionally, you have two options, forget Dan or ask Peter, "What would it take to get you to change your mind?" If he says nothing, then move on. Don't leak stories to the press and go to MLB saying you want to hire him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Denying permission is where the issue came up though. Personally, I think Angelos has handled this whole thing terribly. I believe he should have allowed him to interview and discuss compensation if he's hired, like with Theo Epstein. Acting like a child by saying over and over again "He's mine! He agreed to stay here so he's mine! You can't have him!" is the worst way to handle this and makes the Orioles organization look bad.

Kenny Williams made it very clear, publicly, that he was interested in the BJ CEO position, but Reinsdorf denied permission to allow him to be interviewed. Yet I've seen no comments that Reinsdorf "acted like a child." The BJ's are simply exploiting Angelos' reputation to sow seeds of dissension here. I have no doubt that Duquette is interested in the promotion, but I also think the O's should properly be pissed off about the poor way the situation has been handled by the BJ's from the inception, and are more than within their rights to discuss (demand) compensation that the BJ's would view as exorbitant. If DD is getting squeezed by this situation, that is at some level of his own doing by not adjusting to the above "reality" and putting the story to rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally think the way Toronto has handled this is extremely improper. They have their CEO in limbo. They have not renewed his contract which expired in October' date=' but have allowed him to continue to work on the job "paycheck to paycheck". If you want someone else, fire the man and let him know what's going down. You then approach Peter about DD. Peter says "No". Professionally, you have two options, forget Dan or ask Peter, "What would it take to get you to change your mind?" If he says nothing, then move on. Don't leak stories to the press and go to MLB saying you want to hire him.[/quote']

This. Toronto has put themselves in this position because they can't take care of their own stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's what I don't understand: Roch says discussions aren't at the stage where a compensation proposal has been made to ownership because "ownership doesn't get involved until its serious," and Angelos said he didn't "believe" that specific players had been discussed. Shouldn't he know that with 100% certainty? Who are the Jays talking to, if not with Angelos? Something doesn't add up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's what I don't understand: Roch says discussions aren't at the stage where a compensation proposal has been made to ownership because "ownership doesn't get involved until its serious," and Angelos said he didn't "believe" that specific players had been discussed. Shouldn't he know that with 100% certainty? Who are the Jays talking to, if not with Angelos? Something doesn't add up.

Maybe there are people lower on the totem poll that want to get this situation cleared up so they're discussing it with the Blue Jays on their own?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Hm, seems like perfect situation for Akin as an opener, maybe game 3 if necessary? 
    • You are such a Rebel.
    • Another possibility: If you win game 1, maybe you don't ptich Eflin in Game 2 and try to win Game 2 without using him.   I mean, worst that can happen is you lose and have Eflin for game 3 anyway.   So you won't lose the wild card series without pitching your two best. But you COULD win the wild card series without your two best, and then you would have Eflin and Burnes lined up for games 1 and 2 in Cleveland
    • I like Law a lot, but that is a beyond asinine comment about not playing every day on a playoff team. You know how many playoff teams would slot him in the lineup immediately every game? Answer: the large majority. The Yankees would take Cowser over Verdugo The Tigers might not put him in over Greene/Meadows/Carpenter, but they’d DH him over their options. Cowser would start over every outfielder for the Royals, IMHO. He’d start over Meyers and Dubon for the Astros. The Guardians would probably start him over anybody not named Kwan in the OF, tbh.  I can keep going.
    • Even more of a reason to like FG over BBref,  tbh. Thanks, didn’t realize they switched this year. My point re: FIP is that I rather prefer it over RA/9, not to say it’s perfect. RA/9 treats all runs allowed by a pitcher the same regardless of them being earned or unearned. So, a pitcher on a team with a terrible defense is going to be judged much more harshly than somebody that pitches on a top tier defense. Not to mention the bullpen taking over mid inning dilemma. The funny thing is in your example re: FIP, RA/9 would have the first pitcher but love the second. Either way, these stats, like nearly all single solitary stats, aren’t best taken alone.  For your example, let’s say Pitcher A allowed weak contact and the defenders just had poor range, poor arms, whatever, but in the second example the defenders had great range and great arms making amazing plays to prevent any damage…then what?  Anyways, give me FIP over RA/9 was my point. But if you want to truly assess a pitcher, you’re going to need a few complimentary stats to go along with it.  
    • Really zooming the microscope in on one game with Tarik Skubal, would you consider batting Austin Slater 3rd or 4th to basically pinch hit in the 1st inning, and then replace him in LF with Cowser in the top of the 2nd inning. A tactic that might look good to the SIGBOT but could freak out actual ballplayers.
    • It would make sense. I think there are four possibilities for not announcing Eflin yet: 1. It’s going to be Eflin, we’re just waiting to announce to make it harder for Tigers/Royals to prepare. 2. Hyde and FO are discussing whether to slot Eflin for game 3 to possibly save him for ALDS game 1. 3. Hyde and FO are discussing a possible opener strategy for game 2. 4. Eflin has some minor aches/pains/soreness so we’re delaying the announcement to make sure he will be healthy enough. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...