Jump to content

Orioles reached agreement on 1 year deal with LHP Wesley Wright


Greg

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Right handers have a .762 OPS against Wright the past three seasons (.628 against lefties). Right handers have a .886 OPS against Matusz the past three seasons (.552 against lefties). Right handers have a .558 OPS against Miller the past three seasons (.516 against lefties). I agree with the comments about proximity in evaluating players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a correct way? Does it affect your enjoyment of the game? If so, ask yourself why.

I agree. They should be able to play with shirts unbuttoned down to their belly buttons, and not tucked in. It's not like they are professionals or anything silly like that. They shouldn't be held to the same standard as the rest of the professionals in the world who have to follow guidelines on uniforms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's be clear about a couple of things. First, Wright is a LOOGY, and he doesn't defend RHB that well. He's thrown about .75 innings per appearance in his career, never approaching 1.0 IP/G, and that is a sure sign of a LOOGY. He has an .834 OPSA vs. RHB, .666 vs. LHB. Second, the fact that he was non-tendered says a lot. It's not like the Cubs couldn't afford him, and if they wanted the roster spit, they could have traded him for a minor leaguer. Nevertheless, they dropped him. Overall, he's about on Matusz's level, but probably cheaper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's be clear about a couple of things. First, Wright is a LOOGY, and he doesn't defend RHB that well. He's thrown about .75 innings per appearance in his career, never approaching 1.0 IP/G, and that is a sure sign of a LOOGY. He has an .834 OPSA vs. RHB, .666 vs. LHB. Second, the fact that he was non-tendered says a lot. It's not like the Cubs couldn't afford him, and if they wanted the roster spit, they could have traded him for a minor leaguer. Nevertheless, they dropped him. Overall, he's about on Matusz's level, but probably cheaper.
In the context of LOOGY he's worse than Matusz; referencing their OPS vs LHB above. I think he's far from a lock to make the 25-man roster. We'll see how he looks in spring training.

I disagree with both of you. But that is what make this fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right handers have a .762 OPS against Wright the past three seasons (.628 against lefties). Right handers have a .886 OPS against Matusz the past three seasons (.552 against lefties). Right handers have a .558 OPS against Miller the past three seasons (.516 against lefties). I agree with the comments about proximity in evaluating players.

But .Wright is certainly not a loogy. He's a one inning lefty - that can get a righty out. Not a Miller of 2013-14 but Not bad either. I like it. He's on the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree with both of you. But that is what make this fun.

Agreed. He faced RHB's 60% of the time last year (with much better success than Matusz- .719 OPS against RHB). That doesn't happen with a true LOOGY and a true LOOGY typically doesn't possess 4 pitches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But .Wright is certainly not a loogy. He's a one inning lefty - that can get a righty out. Not a Miller of 2013-14 but Not bad either. I like it. He's on the team.

He is a 0.8 WAR guy who will make less than $5M so I suppose there is some value there.

He is not particularly efficient at getting RHB out, (they hit .719 against him last year, .786 the year before) but that is much better than what Matusz did last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Wright was non tendered by the Cubs. Has held lefties to a .238 avg over his career, but lefties hit .273 against him in 2014. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/orioles?src=hash">#orioles</a></p>? Eduardo A. Encina (@EddieInTheYard) <a href="
">December 17, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The difference between .273 and .238 is three hits over the course of the season based on the number of guys he faced. He is a groundball pitcher and with our defense should be able to take away a few groundball hits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like all relievers, the don't accumulate much WAR. But Wright blows Miller out of the water in lifetime WAR.

I think people really need to use any of the WAR stats when they make no sense. Wright is nowhere near as good as Miller. He's a lot closer to Matusz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference between .273 and .238 is three hits over the course of the season based on the number of guys he faced. He is a groundball pitcher and with our defense should be able to take away a few groundball hits.

I think this is the key. We have a fantastic infield defense. We need groundball pitchers as we will "gobble" them up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another eclectic arm in the bullpen, Buck loves having different styles out there to choose from. I think it really throws off the opponents game plans seeing O'Day, then a crafty lefty like Wright, the power arm of Hunter then the unique sink nasty brought by Zach Britton!

Pretty decent FIP over the last 4 seasons. Really think the Orioles infield will help him out.

Nice signing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think people really need to use any of the WAR stats when they make no sense. Wright is nowhere near as good as Miller. He's a lot closer to Matusz.

There is probably a pretty good chance that Miller isn't going to be as good as he was last year. I'm not saying Wright is in the same class of relievers, he's not, but Miller may not be lights out, either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I remember him from his time with the Braves when I was in Atlanta. This is from the 'Rick Camp Game' in 85.  
    • I don’t think his lack of command in the early going is going to be fixed by changing roles.  Irvin typically has very good command.  He didn’t at the beginning of last year, but recovered it after a stint in the minors.  This year he’s having early problems again, but I think the reasons may be different.  He’s gained velocity and he’s added a new pitch that moves well but he hadn’t quite figured out how to command.  So, I don’t know if he’ll figure it out or not.  If he does, he could emerge a better pitcher than at any previous time in his career. In any event, he will get at least two more starts before Means is ready to return.   Hopefully he’ll make some progress, but he’s likely to find himself in the bullpen when Means returns regardless.       
    • Irvin is probably the most frustrating pitcher on this team right now. He has good velocity and good movement, but consistently misses his targets by a foot or two. Monday night the Twins hit a number of missiles that by luck or pluck didn't fall in, but a better team would have probably put up a touchdown against him. I think Irvin would have more success out of the pen, throwing as hard as he can for 20 pitches, rather than as a starter where he has to hold back a little so as to eat innings. Of course that's not going to resolve his problems with lack of command, but at least he'd be in a position to do less damage out of the BP than by starting every fifth day. 
    • As some people have noted on the Holliday thread, a quick release can help make up for less than a rocket arm and he's quick and has good hands.  Seems to work well with Gunnar too.
    • He’s been murdering a lot of balls.  99th percentile in average exit velocity, 97th in hard hit rate.  He’s been a little unlucky, with a .331 xOBA, .361 xwOBA going into last night.  
    • It's only somewhat relevant to this post, but that game saving catch in Seattle, and the subsequent game winning home run is quite possibly the most impressive thing I ever saw within one inning of  each other.Cedric Mullins did that. I watched Willie Mays for most of my life...I simply dont think he ever did that...certainly not in extra innings and so close those moments were together.
    • Where did you find that info?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...