Jump to content

Are we really smarter?


TheDirtyBird

Recommended Posts

I guess I'm skeptical of "winning" the offseason. I remember when Toronto went out and got R.A Dickey, Josh Johnson, Mark Buehrle, and Jose Reyes. And they were a trendy pick that year to win the division. I believe they finished in fourth place that year. And while I know the NFL is different, I remember the Philadelphia Eagles "dream team." too. Point is, I've become a strong believer in the idea that sometimes the best move is the one you don't make. I don't want us ignoring our needs of course but I don't think we can or should build our team's nucleus on outside names like SD seems to be doing. It of course does suck to see a longtime favorite like Nick go and man did I love watching my brother lefty reliever Miller pitch in tight spots and I loved Nelson too but it's a business. And I strongly disagree with the "Well it's not my money" mindset, yeah it's not our money but it's a long game not a short game. I'd rather the O's become like the O's of the Weaver era who were consistent winners over a long period of time than the O's of the mid 90's that had a short window.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I guess I'm skeptical of "winning" the offseason. I remember when Toronto went out and got R.A Dickey, Josh Johnson, Mark Buehrle, and Jose Reyes. And they were a trendy pick that year to win the division. I believe they finished in fourth place that year. And while I know the NFL is different, I remember the Philadelphia Eagles "dream team." too. Point is, I've become a strong believer in the idea that sometimes the best move is the one you don't make. I don't want us ignoring our needs of course but I don't think we can or should build our team's nucleus on outside names like SD seems to be doing. It of course does suck to see a longtime favorite like Nick go and man did I love watching my brother lefty reliever Miller pitch in tight spots and I loved Nelson too but it's a business. And I strongly disagree with the "Well it's not my money" mindset, yeah it's not our money but it's a long game not a short game. I'd rather the O's become like the O's of the Weaver era who were consistent winners over a long period of time than the O's of the mid 90's that had a short window.

Right. It doesn't matter who wins the off-season. It matters who wins actual games. This is boring and frustrating but I think that makes what Dan and Buck do even more respectable. They're waiting for a calculated moment to jump at not just any opportunity but the right opportunity to add to the club. I can't say what is the smarter approach because it's all a roll of dice in the end but I think it's worth trying to see the big picture rather than envy the flurry of a desperate team making desperate moves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right. It doesn't matter who wins the off-season. It matters who wins actual games. This is boring and frustrating but I think that makes what Dan and Buck do even more respectable. They're waiting for a calculated moment to jump at not just any opportunity but the right opportunity to add to the club. I can't say what is the smarter approach because it's all a roll of dice in the end but I think it's worth trying to see the big picture rather than envy the flurry of a desperate team making desperate moves.

All I know is this, I hate winter and the cold. Bring on spring and let the baseball games start again. My little whine about the winter aside, absolutely, I mean there's something to seeing the long term game. I remember the media gushing over Oakland and Detroit's trades at the trade deadline last summer. Well Oakland lost the WC game and we swept the Tigers. I mean the playoffs are definitely a crapshoot but I guess I wish the people who envy the big moves made by other teams would see that there's a method to the madness. I understand they want us to make a move. Hell I'm interested in seeing who we bring in too but it feels like too many want a move for the sake of a move and honestly I can't say I agree with that line of thinking. I personally really like that Duquette seems to be doing his due diligence on names.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the everyday fan can only go by the actions they see, no?

I think it is true that many fans confuse action with planning and execution of a plan. And that the plan makes sense. Most fans don't grasp the concept that free agency is usually a bad deal, and often blows up budgets and long-term plans. They just want their team to sign players they've seen and heard about with Peter Angelos' money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, why would anyone be upset if they understood our projected committed payroll after arbitration, Dan's direct quote that he expects payroll to rise a bit this year, and the ability to do math to see that means we have 10-18M to spend? Are you concerned that we won't be able to find value for that 10-18M because it is almost January? I'm not at all. I honestly don't get it.

I guess some people see the Orioles are gonna lose 6 starters after this year and they would like the owner to step up just once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its smart because they're building for a long term winner that doesn't trade away key prospects or gives big contracts that'll handicap us in the future. Maybe we're not doing all we can to win in 2015, but giving us a chance to win 2015, 2016, 2017, 2017, 2019, 2020 etc is more important to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Over the 35.33 innings of his last six starts, Dean Kremer has given up only 10 earned runs for an ERA of 2.55. In four of those starts, he's gone 6 to 6.33 innings.
    • I'm glad he's on our side.
    • Thanks for sharing. I've been wanting to see something just like this about Felix.
    • Oooooh. Didn't expect that recall. I'm excited to see it! Bruce has been grinding it out a long time in Norfolk. He started the season looking good, and he started 2022 looking good against Major League talent. Can he peform in June 2023 the way that he performed in April 2022? I hope so. I'm here to see it! I like the idea of left handed starters. Because we have none in the rotation and I want to see 2 good ones sprinkled in. I've got my popcorn, and I'm looking forward to seeing what Bruce Zimmerman can do!
    • Let's start with Ramirez... 1) He'll be 31 in September 2) He's signed thru 2028 3) There is $105M remaining on his contract for 2024-28, for baseball ages 31-35 (he'll be 36 when the contract ends 4) His power production has dropped dramatically in 2023 despite the fact his FB rate has increased 5) His overall offensive production is the lowest it has been since 2015 (age 22) I think the Indians might be happy to offload this contract if they could find a taker to give them some minimal value for it and they are not in contention. My conclusion: If the Orioles like him for the money over the next 5 years, he might be worth a 3-for-1 exchange of truly unknow prospect potential, but not Westburg, Cowser, or GrayRod.  Think 1 of Prieto OR Willems plus 2 more hard throwers from Delmarva.  I would be seriously concerned about how a contract like Ramirez' would constrain the Orioles from signing Rutschman or Henderson to the sort of extension that will make them career Orioles.  Just like in football, where fans are tossing out 2nd round draft picks like they were party favors, I really dislike trading any top 100 prospect and certainly not one that comes with a strong possibility for an over-market priced contract. Bieber... 1) He's 28 as of 5/31 2) This is his worst season since his rookie year with a depressed K rate, increased BB and over 1 hit/IP, but he's still hanging in with an ERA that is somewhat better than the league average. 3) He's making $10M this season and will have his final year of arbitration prior to 2024, which makes the cost of him with a 1.5 year horizon bearable if you can assume he'll maintain his current 110 ERA+.  In addition, given the short horizon and age, that's a much smaller risk than for Ramirez. 4) This is where ME and his team come in to see if they can identify WHY he's not pitching nearly as well this season in addition to the obvious "Will he put the Orioles over the top?" My conclusion: Bieber may well be sought after, but I wouldn't trade any of Westburg, Cowser, or GrayRod for him.  I'd probably be willing to trade either Rom OR Ortiz plus another couple of live arms from the lower minors.  Westburg plus 2 Delmarva arms for both Ramirez and Bieber would be an enormous risk (see Ramirez), but I could get behind it if ME and team have decided he won't be nearly the offensive threat he is now in Camden Yards.
    • I have no idea how the management works here.  I think the Chris Davis fiasco is still a constant shadow. However, we're tied for the second most wins in all of baseball.  Which is astounding given our stat line.  The Giants stats are almost identical to ours and they're a game under 500.  That's where our stats say we should be.   So something else is going on.  I don't think management is going to mess with the chemistry,  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...