Jump to content

How many sure things do we have in our lineup right now?


ChuckS

Recommended Posts

Defense is the reason a team like the Orioles can post one of the best ERAs in the division with a starting rotation comprised of pitchers who are just a little better than average.

Defense is why the Royals beat us in the ALCS, even though we had more hard hit balls than they did.

I can't wait to get Machado and Wieters back in that defense.

Defense can put you over the top and obviously make a difference. No one is going to argue that. But please don't try to tell me that it's equally as important as a team's ability to score runs. That's all I was saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 195
  • Created
  • Last Reply
There were a few folks wringing their hands at the idea of 50 saves going away and calling ownership cheap for not stepping up to keep him.

Half of them thought we were foolish for going into the season with no closer. Whether they based it on cheapness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Defense can put you over the top and obviously make a difference. No one is going to argue that. But please don't try to tell me that it's equally as important as a team's ability to score runs. That's all I was saying.

It's equally as important as scoring runs. Run prevention = Run creation. In importance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me pose this another way then since apparently I am being proved incorrect with numbers which I have still failed to to see other than a few random mediocre OPS predictions from Weams. How many players on this team can we EXPECT to play the full season and have above average production at their position?

It would be nice to count five or six players in that category on a good offensive team. I would put Wieters and Machado in there with Jones and Hardy, but I don't think it's likely that both of them play 140 games. I have a good feeling about Pearce, but who knows what he will do.

I think there is a real arrogance on this board in just assuming things will come together for this team because we have had three winning season following 14 consecutive losing ones. There is complete blind faith in the front office and it seems like anyone who questions the path gets shot down pretty fast. We should have added a big bat or two this off-season whether through free agency or trade. Many other teams around baseball, some with more payroll constraints than us, have made quantifiable improvements. We have not and the pickings left are slim.

Pearce, Jones, Davis and Machado. There are very few SS that will out hit Hardy. I think this will be a recovery year for Wieters. I think Schoop's year will be inconsistent offensively. De Aza will probably hit righties pretty well. The O's still need to add a couple of pieces to score as much as they did last year IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Defense can put you over the top and obviously make a difference. No one is going to argue that. But please don't try to tell me that it's equally as important as a team's ability to score runs. That's all I was saying.

Teams need all three. Good offense, defense and pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They do have a point. Lineup = Run production. Run prevention = Pitching + Defense.

Sure. I see that. Our pitchers are not stellar. And certainly are dependant on good defense for run suppression. I'd venture that our good pitching is more dependant on good defense than most. And we don't have that Oakland foul territory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we have a general idea what to expect from certain guys. We know roughly what we will get from Jones. Hardy lost his power last year. Davis all of a sudden couldn't hit a fastball. Wieters has been as durable as any C, then misses most of the year. Manny has had knee issues. Will Pearce repeat? I have no idea how this team will do. They didn't improve OBP, so I hope they hit a lot of HR again. That's a risky way to expect runs.

I don't see why hitting homers is a risky way to score runs. The O's are pretty consistently good about it. It would be nice to have some guys on base when they hit them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok, thanks for clarifying. So it really is just the same thread packaged differently. You are arguing for more money to be spent to fill 3-4 slots. Weird way to argue it by commenting that the 7 bats we are counting on shouldn't be counted on IMO. Also, we didn't offer those two 25M in 2015. More like 22M.

The offers to Nick and Nelson were made but that doesn't mean we have 22M more available than what we've committed to at this point. Arbitration offers were made afterward. Some might not have been made. Also, DD could have offered to these guys knowing he was going to trade someone if they accepted. I'd be very surprised if we have 22M available beyond what we've committed to at this point.

I knew it was the same thread at the beginning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see why hitting homers is a risky way to score runs. The O's are pretty consistently good about it. It would be nice to have some guys on base when they hit them.
Actually, it is not only not risky, it is definitive. Chances are good that someone is aboard as well.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Defense can put you over the top and obviously make a difference. No one is going to argue that. But please don't try to tell me that it's equally as important as a team's ability to score runs. That's all I was saying.

No, that's not all you were saying. You said you don't believe Schoop can be a better than average 2B because of his hitting. I think if he puts up a .650 OPS he will be better than average, and I don't think that's impossible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's equally as important as scoring runs. Run prevention = Run creation. In importance.

Pitching + defense = run prevention. Maybe you are grouping pitching in with defense. I am just talking about a team's ability to field the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • The bullpen has warts for sure, but if this offense doesn't figure out how to hit good pitching in the playoffs, the bullpen won't matter. Even I got a little excited when they put 5 and 9 up on the board Tues and Wed, and then it crashed back to reality last night when I remembered they were facing Schmidt and Stroman. When facing a real ace like Cole they were completely shut down. What's gonna happen next week when they face Skubal, Reagins, and/or Lugo? The mediocre bullpen won't matter if they can't figure out how to score some runs off pitchers like that...
    • Why carry four 1 inning guys over a LH long option? Cionel stinks and should not be on the roster over Povich when you still have Akin, Coulombe and Soto.
    • Really would be nice to win tonight OR have DET lose so then they can play around Sat/Sun when the games would have no bearing on the seeding. Dont want this to come down to Sunday and having to win to get the 4 seed or then there will be some tough decisions that have to be made.
    • Looking for a big performance from him next week. This is why he’s here. 
    • It was R-R-L-R coming up. Cano is the guy Hyde matches up against the toughest hitters. Yes, those guys got to him the previous game but that is his job and Hyde also probably saw a redemption opportunity to get his confidence back after a tough outing. I don't see why that was bad move except in hindsight it didn't work out. Congrats if you called it in the game thread. 
    • Soto and Judge are both first ballot Hall of Famers when they retire.  Soto is younger than Adley, has a career bWAR over 36, and dominated the 2019 postseason as a 21 year old. Folks probably weren't paying much attention to him or the Nats back then, but he has been a force ever since being called up in 2018. And Judge...not sure why nobody else saw value in a six and a half foot man with a ton of raw power, but good for them for nailing that 32nd pick in the draft. Having these guys 2 and 3 in the lineup is such a game changer, because there is so much pressure on the opposing pitchers to not screw up with any of their other 7 hitters.  One guy you may be able to get around.  But 2.....much harder.   That being said, I do think it is more about us losing the division than anything else.  Tampa showed us last year how to keep fighting in spite of injuries. Those guys were decimated and were like a relentless swarm of bees hanging around us all the way until the last weekend.  They won 99 games with an extremely depleted pitching staff and a slew of no-name hitters who kept coming up with big hits.  We lost this division by playing uninspired, unclutch, and lame baseball for three full months.  And amazingly, we will have gone all of July, all of August, and all of September without so much as a 4 game winning streak.   Winning the season series against every division opponent for the second year in a row is something I am very happy about after years of being a doormat. I am sorry we couldn't win the division, but I am also glad to be playing next week and not sitting at home waiting to play a team on a high after winning a playoff series. 
    • It's game 160 tonight and we just discovered our bull pen has warts? Elias's fault, Hyde's fault - we've had ample threads of he sucks, they suck, fire him, demote him, etc.  Well we are off to the playoffs and the pen may be the reason we don't go far. And if so I doubt few on here will be surprised. It is what it is going forward with some but not necessarily significant adjustments. We play this year out with the hand we can put together - next Monday. Till then, just win one in Minnasota for the bottom line. Last night is over and IMO really didn't teach us anything we didn't already know. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...