Jump to content

Would Duquette have signed Cruz if......


33rdst

Recommended Posts

Part of the reason I started the thread was to try to illustrate the dilemma the GM of a smaller market team has. The idea that we just can't eat contracts like those we have given the players mentioned. Whether it's trying to sign Cruz or extend Tillman, Chen, Davis,Machado or Weiters. Contracts like these can damage teams like ours that don't have the payroll flexibility of our competitors. It just helps me appreciate how difficult Duquette's job is in trying to sustain a winner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I absolutely agree. And the market for Cruz was why DD didn't sign him, not the O's budget. Put another way, if DD didn't have those commitments to Ubaldo and Yoon, he still wasn't going to shell out 58 million to a one dimensional aging DH coming off a career year.

That's how you end up with a question 3 years down the line of: "if DD didn't have Cruz's contract, would he have been able to extend Machado?" or something like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know, I looked it up before I posted. ;)

Jake has a slight advantage in ERA+.

I think the difference is slight enough that comparable is a very fair term.

I'd give Bedard a significant edge due to the quality of the lineups he was facing on a regular basis. That said, Jake had a helluva season and it will be interesting to see if he's just as good in 2015. It's frustrating as hell that we were unable to unlock his potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think this is much to do with it. I think if he had 100 million to spend' date=' he still does not overspend. He had a number that he thought Cruz would be worth and that's what he offered.[/quote']

Which is a good strategy. You shouldn't spend more just because you can. That impacts the ability to make other deals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think this is much to do with it. I think if he had 100 million to spend' date=' he still does not overspend. He had a number that he thought Cruz would be worth and that's what he offered.[/quote']

I agree with this. Not signing Cruz had nothing to do with Ubaldo and everything to do with not signing a DH to 4 years who would be 38/39 at the end of the contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...... he wasn't saddled by the bad contracts of Ubaldo Jimenez and Sun Yuk Moon (14,225,000). Right off the bat let me say that I love Duquette and I think he's the best GM the O's have had since Hank Peters. However, just for the sake of discussion, does Duquette offer Cruz more money if he doesn't have these contracts? Or did he value Cruz at the level of his offer and wouldn't have gone any higher regardless?

I think Duquette would have gone higher on a three year deal and, although that might not have been enough to counter Seattle's four year offer, it might have made a difference.

Here's another thought. What would Wallace have been able to do with Stroop and Arrieta if they weren't traded for Feldman.

Hey, it's 13 degrees outside what else do you have to do?:)

I wouldn't lump Yoon in with Ubaldo. Yoon makes less in his entire 3-year deal than Ubaldo did by last All Star break.

And maybe this is my own point of view inserting itself, but I think Cruz isn't an Oriole because he's a soon-to-be 35-year-old DH who will probably go through his career terminating decline in the next couple years. But he wanted and got 4/57. Duquette thought that was excessive in years and money. It's madness to sign a guy to a multi-year contract based on a career+walk year at 33/34.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Erik Bedard had arm problems and was never the same. Could happen to Jake too. He missed some time last spring. Still, if he stays healthy he looked awesome last summer. Also, even in his good year, I don't think Bedard was as good as Jake was last year.

I looked at the numbers, but I think the year that Bedard had in Baltimore in the AL East was much better than Jakes year in NL. Pretty sure he struck out 10 per 9 innings too. And it is worth pointing out that Bedard is a lefty and Jake a righty. I'll put it this way. If Jake had his season in 2007, I don't believe Andy would have had the Reds and Mariners looking to unload the cabinet to get him. But maybe I am just bitter that he didn't make it here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think this is much to do with it. I think if he had 100 million to spend' date=' he still does not overspend. He had a number that he thought Cruz would be worth and that's what he offered.[/quote']

I think you are right.

When you hear of cheap rich people, maybe this is what they are doing: understanding the value of things and not overpaying for them. No matter what.

One day maybe I can verify this theory in a more informed way. Until then, let's go camping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just clearly did not want to overspend I feel and go more years than what he was comfortable with. I think Dans greatest asset he brings as GM is he pays players what they are worth based on the statistics he feels are important.

You look at the Ravens and their competitor today the Patriots, how those organizations have stayed competitive for so long is they always pay players on future performance never on past performance which we can all say some of the ex-GM's around here have fallen victim to (Belle, Segui, etc.).

Ubaldo could be the one mistake Dan makes during his tenure with the O's but I feel you have to give Ubaldo some time to prove his worth at the age of 30. I will say this though, I recall him not staying with the team for the ALCS which concerns me if he is truly an all in team type guy and good presence for the younger guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ubaldo could be the one mistake Dan makes during his tenure with the O's but I feel you have to give Ubaldo some time to prove his worth at the age of 30. I will say this though, I recall him not staying with the team for the ALCS which concerns me if he is truly an all in team type guy and good presence for the younger guys.
Wow, are people still bringing up this nonsense? Who knows why Ubaldo wasn't with the team during the ALCS. Who knows, maybe Buck or Wallace wanted him to join Chris in Florida to work on his stuff. Or maybe his family needed him; Domincans hold family to be all important. I'm sure that Buck was OK with this or he would have said sometihng.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • I'm not saying the bolded is impossible. But what are the odds of that happening for the rest of this season, even if he were to be called up tomorrow? I'm not sure how much value Moutcastle would have (even if he continues to have a very good season) to a team who is rebuilding/reseting/tanking/whatever you want to call it. Mountcastle would seem to have more value to a team who is trying to win and needs offensive production at 1B/DH. And if they are already trying to win, what pitching are they willing to depart with. The only team I can think of that may fit this mold is SEA. IMO that's way too much to give up for a relief pitcher, considering that we only need a good middle reliever. We don't need Emmanuel Clase for the rest of this season. It looks like Kimbrel will do. And then next year Felix will be coming back.
    • I think Elias' MO is always going to be to squeeze the max potential value out of every asset. If Kjerstad isn't playing well enough to wrest away more than 10 ABs/week from the other players on the roster, then I don't think he stays up. Especially when he'd be tying up a bench spot with a player who can really only play one position in the field. He's going to have to earn a bigger time share to justify his spot. 
    • Well, he either shows something or he doesn't. I don't think he's going anywhere until he shows something. 
    • Means starting tonight for Norfolk. Hopefully he puts some length in his start tonight. Probably his next to last minor league start if they do bring him back up. 
    • I'm not saying that id not possible, but it is certainly not probable. Given the talent gap between Carter and Norby. Again, IMO the greater odds/gain is that Norby is a useful piece in a trade than him becoming the next Evan Carter.
    • That sequence showed why Mateo is on the team. There are much worse things than having him in the 9 spot here and there versus LHP. And when he’s not, he can pinch run and do the exact same thing. It’s why when push comes to shove, and it will soon, it’s Urias’ head on the chopping block and not Jorge’s.    We all know this, but it’s nice to see it demonstrated on the field here and there as a reminder.  
    • We could really use Cease too. The WS had a lineup the other day and I believe everyone or at least 8 guys had a sub 200 BA.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...