Jump to content

Daily News: MLB Puts Ponzi Linked Owner, who nearly lost his club


weams

Recommended Posts

As CHAIRMAN of the MLB finance committee.

http://metsblog.com/metsblog/daily-news-fred-wilpon-named-chairman-of-mlbs-finance-committee/

Wilpon who was closely allied with Bernie Madoff and had to sell controlling interest in his club to retain it, helped MLB railroad the MASN arbitration while serving on it's panel. He is now rewarded in kind.

http://metsmerizedonline.com/2015/01/fred-wilpon-named-chairman-of-mlb-finance-committee.html/

In what was his first major decision as the 10th commissioner of baseball, Manfred showed that the commissioner’s office will continue to have the same close and binding relationship with Fred and Jeff Wilpon – just as it had for nearly a quarter of a century under Bud Selig.

Wilpon, who allegedly lost about $700 million in the largest Ponzi scheme in American History – the second time he was embroiled in a massive Ponzi scheme – was nearly forced to sell the team three years ago and is still on uncertain financial footing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply
The new executive council are Yankees general partner Hal Steinbrenner, Twins owner Jim Pohlad, Rays owner Stu Sternberg, Rangers co-chairman Ray Davis, Pirates owner Bob Nutting, Braves chairman Terry McGuirk and Cubs owner Tom Ricketts. Among those coming off the council are White Sox board chairman Jerry Reinsdorf, Red Sox owner John Henry and Reds owner Bob Castellini, all of whom — perhaps also not coincidentally — opposed Manfred last summer.

A brave new world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://deadspin.com/5886867/how-bernie-madoffs-money-ran-the-mets

15 years of at least 10 percent returns on their investments with Madoff, Wilpon and Katz felt they were playing with house money. A "vig," Saul Katz's son David called it, borrowing the gambling term for the fee collected by a bookie on every transaction. Irving Picard, the trustee suing Wilpon and Katz on behalf of Madoff's victims, alleges that the owners were so dependent on their ill-gotten gains from Madoff, that they spent recklessly and should have been in the red.

"In at least 2002, the Mets would not have made a profit but for the Madoff income," Picard said, adding that in multiple seasons, the Mets would not have been able to make payroll without Madoff's returns. "They were so expectant of those steady, 10 to 14 percent returns that they began to budget them into their business plans."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weams, you do have a certain flair. Ponzi linked owner. He was kind of the victim, no? Railroaded the MASN decision. You don't sound very objective. :)

He ran the Mets for 15 years on the return off the scamming of others. When Madoff went down he did loss 700 million. Not before. He was one of the biggest profiteers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, the guy trying to hire Duquette doesn't have the authority to hire him?

There is a question of whether the trust itself, with the Rogers daughter as well, can make that move. They certainly have control of enough money to pay him. So yeah, they could hire him. To research dome grasses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a question of whether the trust itself, with the Rogers daughter as well, can make that move. They certainly have control of enough money to pay him. So yeah, they could hire him. To research dome grasses.

The Trust itself has a voting majority of shares, but has been ousted from the board of directors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...