Jump to content

Collusion to Fix the 2015 Eastern American League Division Series


AshGL1914

Recommended Posts

If this goes through and Dan goes to the Blue Jays, and if lines could be drawn between the Blue Jays, the Yankees, and MLB - then this could go far beyond "tampering" but would in fact be tantamount to Collusion to fix the American League East.

I called in to Inside Pitch last night with multiple, tied-together questions that might lead to a discussion of Major League Baseball's role in all of this. I gave all of my questions to the producer and was put on hold. When I joined the show I asked my first question, (Can the Nationals continue to claim that they are hurt by the MASN deal when they just paid so very much for a player?) and before I could get more than two words into my follow up (which would have lead from MASN to Dan and the Blue Jays) the line was cut, a nervious and terse answer to the MASN question was given (that the two issues are or should be unrelated), and then they went very quickly into an unscheduled comercial break (there had been one just before the previous call).

There feels like there might be more to this story than "Tampering". Something more disturbing.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the fact that the Nats have the resources to sign Scherzer has too much of a relationship to whether they are hurt by the MASN deal. The Nats have a very wealthy owner, and compared to the Orioles they have higher attendance, higher ticket prices, more extortionate concession prices, a stricter policy about bringing in food and drinks, and a bigger chunk of parking revenue. So, they can afford Scherzer if that's how the Lerners want to spend their money. None of that changes the fact that they probably could make a lot more money off their TV rights than they have made under the MASN deal -- not that I feel any sympathy for them. That was the price of admission for the Orioles not going to court to try to stop MLB from moving the team to DC, and the Lerners knew that when they bought the team and undoubtedly factored that in to the price they were willing to pay to buy it.

I don't think there is collusion between NY and Toronto, because Boston would be all over that issue if there was anything there. The fact that Ed Rogers is an idiot, and has a friend in the Yankee organization who thinks highly of Duquette, is unfortunate for us but I'm not buying any conspiracy theories. It doesn't help the Yankees for Duquette to stay in the AL East or for Toronto to be stronger than they are now from a management point of view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this goes through and Dan goes to the Blue Jays, and if lines could be drawn between the Blue Jays, the Yankees, and MLB - then this could go far beyond "tampering" but would in fact be tantamount to Collusion to fix the American League East.

I called in to Inside Pitch last night with multiple, tied-together questions that might lead to a discussion of Major League Baseball's role in all of this. I gave all of my questions to the producer and was put on hold. When I joined the show I asked my first question, (Can the Nationals continue to claim that they are hurt by the MASN deal when they just paid so very much for a player?) and before I could get more than two words into my follow up (which would have lead from MASN to Dan and the Blue Jays) the line was cut, a nervious and terse answer to the MASN question was given (that the two issues are or should be unrelated), and then they went very quickly into an unscheduled comercial break (there had been one just before the previous call).

There feels like there might be more to this story than "Tampering". Something more disturbing.

John

f07.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice.

I agree it's out there, but it's not like Major League Baseball is above such maneuvers. They've done things like that in the past, and they'll do it again if so motivated. And the suggestion of collusion wasn't so much a charge with an absolute smoking gun, but was suggested as a suspicion that could merit further investigation or leading to legal action against MLB.

The Office of the Commissioner threatened harsh repercussions should Orioles ownership fight the MASN arbitration. Separating our club from the MLB Executive of the Year certainly qualifies.

As to the Yankees' input: can't you see how having a structurally unstable Orioles in the AL East benefits them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think there is collusion between NY and Toronto, because Boston would be all over that issue if there was anything there. The fact that Ed Rogers is an idiot, and has a friend in the Yankee organization who thinks highly of Duquette, is unfortunate for us but I'm not buying any conspiracy theories. It doesn't help the Yankees for Duquette to stay in the AL East or for Toronto to be stronger than they are now from a management point of view.

This is 100% correct. The conspiracy theorists and the "us against the world" segment on the board are amusing. Levine advising Rogers to seek out Duquette doesn't benefit the Yankees in any way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no contradiction between the Nats having a bad MASN deal and the Scherzer signing. The Lerners have deep pockets and the Nats franchise is highly profitable overall despite their poor TV deal. They are not cash poor. Would they like more revenue coming from TV? Of course they would.

But I am sympathetic to the original post's take that MLB is conspiring against the Orioles. Based on what I've read about the MASN case, I don't think I'm in tinfoil hat territory in saying that I believe there was a secret deal struck between MLB (and in particular, Rob Manfred) and the Lerners at the time the Nats moved to DC. I believe that MLB guaranteed the Nats that they would be able to either get out from the MASN deal, or at least get a generous interpretation of fair market value for their TV rights by a certain date, and agreed to give them money otherwise.

I believe that MLB has already given the Nats $25 million under this deal and stands to keep paying money to the Nats if the MASN case isn't resolved in the Nats' favor. MLB therefore tilted the arbitration panel in order to give the Nats a favorable outcome. They were surprised and angry when Angelos challenged the arbitration result in court, and are looking for ways to threaten and intimidate the Orioles into backing off. Losing the All-Star game and working to transfer Dan Duquette to Toronto are the first two examples; there will be more.

MLB's interest is both financial (they are on the hook to the Nats until the Nats get the TV fees they were promised) and personal (Rob Manfred doesn't want his dirty laundry to be aired in open court, in particular his involvement in the secret deal with the Lerners).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no contradiction between the Nats having a bad MASN deal and the Scherzer signing. The Lerners have deep pockets and the Nats franchise is highly profitable overall despite their poor TV deal. They are not cash poor. Would they like more revenue coming from TV? Of course they would.

But I am sympathetic to the original post's take that MLB is conspiring against the Orioles. Based on what I've read about the MASN case, I don't think I'm in tinfoil hat territory in saying that I believe there was a secret deal struck between MLB (and in particular, Rob Manfred) and the Lerners at the time the Nats moved to DC. I believe that MLB guaranteed the Nats that they would be able to either get out from the MASN deal, or at least get a generous interpretation of fair market value for their TV rights by a certain date, and agreed to give them money otherwise.

I believe that MLB has already given the Nats $25 million under this deal and stands to keep paying money to the Nats if the MASN case isn't resolved in the Nats' favor. MLB therefore tilted the arbitration panel in order to give the Nats a favorable outcome. They were surprised and angry when Angelos challenged the arbitration result in court, and are looking for ways to threaten and intimidate the Orioles into backing off. Losing the All-Star game and working to transfer Dan Duquette to Toronto are the first two examples; there will be more.

MLB's interest is both financial (they are on the hook to the Nats until the Nats get the TV fees they were promised) and personal (Rob Manfred doesn't want his dirty laundry to be aired in open court, in particular his involvement in the secret deal with the Lerners).

I'll join the tin foil hat crew. I believe like you, that there is a direct correlation between the MASN dispute, the all-star game redaction, and the Tor/DD nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the fact that the Nats have the resources to sign Scherzer has too much of a relationship to whether they are hurt by the MASN deal. The Nats have a very wealthy owner, and compared to the Orioles they have higher attendance, higher ticket prices, more extortionate concession prices, a stricter policy about bringing in food and drinks, and a bigger chunk of parking revenue. So, they can afford Scherzer if that's how the Lerners want to spend their money. None of that changes the fact that they probably could make a lot more money off their TV rights than they have made under the MASN deal -- not that I feel any sympathy for them. That was the price of admission for the Orioles not going to court to try to stop MLB from moving the team to DC, and the Lerners knew that when they bought the team and undoubtedly factored that in to the price they were willing to pay to buy it.

I don't think there is collusion between NY and Toronto, because Boston would be all over that issue if there was anything there. The fact that Ed Rogers is an idiot, and has a friend in the Yankee organization who thinks highly of Duquette, is unfortunate for us but I'm not buying any conspiracy theories. It doesn't help the Yankees for Duquette to stay in the AL East or for Toronto to be stronger than they are now from a management point of view.

You are no fun at all!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the fact that the Nats have the resources to sign Scherzer has too much of a relationship to whether they are hurt by the MASN deal. The Nats have a very wealthy owner, and compared to the Orioles they have higher attendance, higher ticket prices, more extortionate concession prices, a stricter policy about bringing in food and drinks, and a bigger chunk of parking revenue. So, they can afford Scherzer if that's how the Lerners want to spend their money. None of that changes the fact that they probably could make a lot more money off their TV rights than they have made under the MASN deal -- not that I feel any sympathy for them. That was the price of admission for the Orioles not going to court to try to stop MLB from moving the team to DC, and the Lerners knew that when they bought the team and undoubtedly factored that in to the price they were willing to pay to buy it.

I don't think there is collusion between NY and Toronto, because Boston would be all over that issue if there was anything there. The fact that Ed Rogers is an idiot, and has a friend in the Yankee organization who thinks highly of Duquette, is unfortunate for us but I'm not buying any conspiracy theories. It doesn't help the Yankees for Duquette to stay in the AL East or for Toronto to be stronger than they are now from a management point of view.

I think the Nationals have great resources.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

f07.jpg

I think the original poster raises a valid point, and I guarantee Peter Angelos feels the same way. For all the Angelos hate he really has been screwed over by MLB the last few years. They moved their pet project, the expos, to DC and split our market into half. Now they are going back on the the agreement they made with Angelos. Then they are basically allowing open tampering and putting pressure on Angelos to let his GM just walk away to his division rival. Lawyers make a living off of tin foil people in ccourt. Asbestos causes cancer. Get outta here, that's crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not believe that their was a fix in on the ALCS. Just a real lucky team.

LOL, Not the Royals debacle. This coming (2015) Baseball Season.

Recall for a moment that when the reserve clause finally blew up in MLB's face the charge was "Collusion on Behalf of Major League Baseball to Fix the World Series".

If one or more teams acted in this instance to cripple another team in the same division and acted with the assistance of Major League Baseball ("MLB urges The Orioles to release their GM to the Blue Jays). Then these actions (coming on the heels of threats of repercussions due to the MASN dispute) must be called into question. If, and this seems likely-these events are connected, then charges of "Collusion to Fix the 2015 AL East" demand an answer either by internal (useless in the case of MLB tampering) or external (court proceedings). Living with a lawyer must have rubbed off on me, but I see a case here.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • WTF? How did I get thrown into this? I've always given credit to John Angelos for hiring Elias as well. Why would I label you an Angelos Apologist for that?  Such an odd statement.
    • Just caught up with this thread and I have a few thoughts/comments. 1. As I stated earlier, I was told this months ago by two separate people who seemed to have good information, but were connected through several degrees of separation. I don't really pass on stuff like that anymore because there is no use starting rumors before I have real concrete info. Clearly something coming from Bloomburg holds more weight than something from Orioleshangout.com. I'm glad it hit though. 2. My thoughts are anything that removes the Angelos family from ownership has to be a netgain for Orioles fans. I will give John Angelos credit for hiring Mike Elias and turning this franchise around into something to be proud of, but his ridiculous comments and emergence in the media suddenly during a year of success showed me that an Angelos can't help but to take center stage when things are going well. It was just like when Peter Angelos came out of hibernation when the Orioles where heading to the ALCS in 2014. I was in that lockeroom and there were players and coaches going, "That's the first time I've ever seen him." 3. I've seen a lot of stuff thrown around about Bloomberg, and I certainly understand the poster on here who lost his job to his Carlyle Group being jaded, but at the end of the day, there is no Billionaire out there who is not connected with greasing palms or not associated with the federal government in some way. Once you get to that level you have to play the game. Unless you are Elon Musk and so rich and so successful that you just tell everyone who doesn't like you, including other Billionaires, to "Go F themselves." Lol... Yes, I have a man crush on him! 4. As for Bloomberg running the Orioles just to make money and thinking he will pinch pennies, I just don't see it. Billionaires have big egos and few want to own a losing team. Billionaires don't buy teams to make money. They buy professional sports team for the glory of being an owner on a team that wins the championship.  5. As for Elias, why would Bloomberg not want to keep Elias and his crew? If anything, he's more likely to pay what it will take to keep him and his crew together for many years. My biggest concern with Elias has been him suddenly realizing he will not be able to spend enough to keep his top players that he drafted, signed and developed. With Bloomberg, I can't imagine him allowing a Gunnar or Jackson Holliday to walk over money if they are still impact players. 6. Personally, this would make my Holiday season if this somehow came to fruition before the year was out. Give me a Billionaire over a guy who's done nothing but ride on his father's coattails any day. 
    • It was @Tryptaminewho posted that, and you are right that he should be acknowledged.   I was really skeptical about it because the original report (which @Tryptaminewas relaying from a Mets fan board) said the Carlyle Group was buying the team.  That’s not permissible under MLB rules.  But David Rubenstein is the co-chair and co-founder of Carlyle, so close enough!    The other part of the rumor was that the original offer was $1.1 bb but that it was raised to $1.4 bb after Peter Angelos objected to selling.   That also didn’t seem credible, since Peter appears to have not been mentally competent over the last 5 years.    In any event, we’ll see where this goes.  The original thread is here:  
    • As much as I'd not like to agree with @Billy F-Face3about a lot of things, I do agree with his above post that JA can take credit for hiring Elias...and allowing Elias to do pretty much everything he wanted to do, especially establishing an international scouting presence which is something that didn't exist under his dad. If anyone wants to be honest here (I question that sometimes) when it comes to JA, it's usually something like "Yeah, he hired Elias, whatever," and they move on to whatever issue JA has ensnared himself in at the moment, probably something like giving a stupid interview like he did time and time again throughout 2023.   But if Elias is one of the best things that's happened to this franchise, then JA needs to be recognized for hiring him.  And retaining him thus far.  Hiring and retaining good people isn't easy in any industry, especially in one like Major League Baseball.  @Bemorewinsyou can't look at the last two seasons we've had, the amount of talent we have in the system and say that he's run this franchise into the ground.  That's being intentionally obtuse. I get it, a lot of people here are hammers and all they see is nails, especially when it comes to all things Angelos.  It's easy to bash them at every given turn because they've given us a lot of material to work with over the years but with JA it hasn't all been bad.  He nailed the most important part of his stewardship of the franchise, everyone should be able to agree on that. If that makes me sound like some Angelos apologist as I'm sure @Tony-OHwill label me, well, so be it.  I've been called worse.  But I don't think I wrote any lies above. That doesn't mean I don't think that JA is a tone deaf trouser-snake cheapskate, I absolutely do think those things.  He's terrible in front of the media, a microphone and a camera are his worst enemies.  His cries about having to raise prices if they want to spend money on talent are stupid.  He does strike me as someone who was born on third base and thinks he hit a triple, which is obnoxious.  While I give him a lot of credit for hiring Elias, I am absolutely thrilled at the prospect of the Orioles being sold and the Angelos family going away like a fart in the wind.
    • You make a good point, they could sell Rubenstein minority interest with agreement to sell the majority stake when PA dies which locks this in and avoids the big capital gains estate tax charge. Bisciotti  had a similar agreement where he came in as minority owner with an agreement to buy out the Modells at a later time. 
    • I can’t imagine a guy like Rubenstein would be ok with that set up. He’s not going to take orders from John Angelos.
    • The internet was a mistake. Very promising news. Trying not to get my hopes up, but it's a step in the right direction! Side note - Is there anywhere in these 19 pages that gives credit to the poster from a few weeks back who started the thread that this may be in the works?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...