Jump to content

Roch: O's sign Parmelee and DeLaRosa


33rdst

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Yeah, was a key fixture in Angels' 2013 pen.

Anyone know anything about his stuff? Pitches, speeds, pitch grades, etc.?

Edit: I see 51% ground ball rate. Perfect for our D.

From Roch: "Dane De La Rosa had a breakout season with the Angels in 2013," Duquette said. "He has a good fastball and he also has a good curveball. Knee surgery in 2014 sidelined him and he's recovered from it.

6' 7" 245

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, was a key fixture in Angels' 2013 pen.

Anyone know anything about his stuff? Pitches, speeds, pitch grades, etc.?

Edit: I see 51% ground ball rate. Perfect for our D.

http://irfast.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-emergence-of-dane-de-la-rosa.html

With the Angels, it has been anything but, averaging over 94 MPH. Maybe the minor league gun wasn't working properly that day, or maybe he was just having a bad day (if nothing else, it is a cautionary tale on one time looks), but the fastball is good velocity wise. This certainly helps (no one on the above list didn't throw hard), but he is not in the top 10 in fastball velocity but is in the top 10 in fastball whiffs. Vertical movement tended to be a good indicator as to why some plus fastballs got whiffs and some didn't, and De La Rosa gets a lot of vertical movement on his fastball according to Pitch F/X (nearly a full inch on average better than the average whiff on 95 MPH + fastballs). The Angels' ballpark does make vertical movement data higher apparently, and it shows when you break De La Rosa's vertical movement data by home and road (at home it is around 11 inches, on the road it is about 9 inches). With this correction, he is in more human territory, but still in good territory.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the Oriole Park bomb out onto Eutaw.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/Jzwz8rZmEKM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Cuts down runner Nick style.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/0okKRyl1smk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Plays the wall and cuts down runner at second.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/k3eGLLzRTzw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the Oriole Park bomb out onto Eutaw.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/Jzwz8rZmEKM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Cuts down runner Nick style.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/0okKRyl1smk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Plays the wall and cuts down runner at second.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/k3eGLLzRTzw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Looks like he has played RF, LF and 1B. Will he be our left-handed Steve Pearce?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • There have been 2-3 times when it seemed logical to call him up but they don’t.   I’ve never understood this thing they have for Baker.  Hey, Cole Irvin is available again!!
    • While we lost some talented players, I think the consensus was some of the players we lost were actually blocking more talented prospects. The loss of Westburg and Urias should have been mostly offset by Holliday and Mayo. Instead, they were truly abysmal.  Povich had some nice moments but he was disappointing as well.  Maybe our expectations were too high - Elias is not going to hit on every prospect, and even the ones that turn out good may take a while to adjust. Still, I think it is fair to have expected more out of Mayo and Holliday since the organization deemed them ready to promote.  In addition to the prospects, you had Adley hit a wall, going from a 6 WAR pace to replacement level, and Cowser and O'Hearn both struggling.  Certainly injuries hurt us, but we should have been strong enough to overcome them. Maybe not to sustain a 105 win pace but I think it is fair to say we should have been able to beat 95 wins and win the division even with the injuries.  
    • I was wondering what the knee-jerk reaction would be to an ugly game last night, but the truth is that the bullpen is fine, as is the rest of the team. We lack a true lockdown closer, but we have six arms by my count that are very good relievers in Akin, Perez, Coulombe, Webb, Cano, and Domingez. And you can add Suarez to that list next week, and possibly Povich, who should also make the PS roster as a lefty long relief option to mirror Suarez. Anyway, that game could have and would have gone much differently, IMO, if it were a playoff game. Burnes obviously stays in longer and gets at least through the top of the order if not back down to the bottom third to hand it over to the bullpen. Hopefully we'd be able to scratch out some runs, but that's not the bullpen's fault.  This is an extremely good team with a lead. Let's hope we get on the board early and often starting tonight.
    • Boy, Brandon Young who has some decent numbers at Norfolk must be injured or unimpressive to the front office to not even get a look for this bullpen. Bryan Baker is almost a waste of a call up.
    • Povich is off vs Detroit at least. Even if they carry a 9 man pen, Doubt that 5 will be left handers
    • I hate to say it because they are all eligible to succeed or fail ( DC just coming back ), would probally go with Soto.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...