Jump to content

As Expected, Orioles Offseason Graded a "D"

25 Nuggets

By 25 Nuggets
in Orioles Talk

Recommended Posts

25 Nuggets Hangout Grand Counsel

25 Nuggets

Posted
Posted

Grading the Offseason: AL East

Grading the Offseason: AL East

By Matt Snyder | Baseball Writer

February 13, 2015 2:14 pm ET

We could still see a trade or two and there are yet a few -- not very enticing -- free agents who remain unsigned, but for the most part, the "Hot Stove" portion of the offseason is over and we're moving into the spring training phase.

Thus, we need to assign grades to each team for what we just witnessed. Premature? Please. We shall cast immediate judgments on everyone and etch them in stone for all posterity.

Let's start with the AL East and go in order of last season's finish in the standings.

Baltimore Orioles

Grade: D

Gone from the outfield (and/or a DH spot in the case of the latter) are Nick Markakis and Nelson Cruz. In ... Travis Snider? They also added catcher J.P. Arencibia, corner infielder/outfielder Chris Parmalee and reliever Wesley Wright while bringing back DH/bench bat Delmon Young.

Still, this is not a very good offseason. In fact, it's pretty bad. They won 96 games last season and it appears they're just resting on that in addition to hoping for better health (Manny Machado) and some bounce-backs (Chris Davis). It could work. They won the East by 12 games last season, after all. It's also worth wondering if Dan Duquette's flirtations with the Blue Jays hampered things here.

Still, none of that changes that the Orioles lost two significant pieces from last year's club and added zero. In discussing only the offseason, this was a terrible one. What saves them from an F is that they didn't really need to do a ton to remain in contention.

I think he's underrating the addition of Travis Snider, thinking of his days in Toronto and not Pittsburgh last year. He's also not considering any in-house replacements. I would rather call the off season a "C", if anything because no bad contracts were handed out. Knowing Markakis has neck surgery, I think resigning him would have lowered my grade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply
ArtVanDelay Hangout Grand Counsel

ArtVanDelay

Posted
Posted
Grading the Offseason: AL East

I think he's underrating the addition of Travis Snider, thinking of his days in Toronto and not Pittsburgh last year. He's also not considering any in-house replacements. I would rather call the off season a "C", if anything because no bad contracts were handed out. Knowing Markakis has neck surgery, I think resigning him would have lowered my grade.

I give us a B-. I like the Snider addition and the Rule V guys. I'm sure one of the under the radar free agents will step up this year. Nobody works the scrap heap like DD. We didn't give Cruz and Nick bad contracts and picked up a comp pick for losing Cruz. A very boring offseason but not a bad one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Frobby Hangout Grand Counsel

Frobby

Posted
Posted

I think it all depends on what you think you are grading. If all you are grading is gain or loss of talent, then D is a good grade. If you are grading maintaining a competitive team under circumstances where you have to give large raises to half the team and can't raise your payroll by an equivalent amount, then I think a B is on order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mayor McCheese All-Star

Mayor McCheese

Posted
Posted
Grading the Offseason: AL East

I think he's underrating the addition of Travis Snider, thinking of his days in Toronto and not Pittsburgh last year. He's also not considering any in-house replacements. I would rather call the off season a "C", if anything because no bad contracts were handed out. Knowing Markakis has neck surgery, I think resigning him would have lowered my grade.

Travis Snider had better numbers in Toronto, not Pittsburgh.

                                                                              Year   Age  Tm  Lg   G  PA  AB   R   H 2B 3B HR RBI BB  SO   BA  OBP  SLG  OPSTOR (5 yrs)        242 917 835 108 207 56  1 31 112 69 250 .248 .306 .429 .735PIT (3 yrs)        301 789 711  82 173 32  4 19  72 72 176 .243 .315 .380 .694
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tx Oriole Hangout Grand Counsel

Tx Oriole

Posted
Posted

A good team like the O's don't need a whole lot added. The FA out there were not

worth what they were getting anyway. I believe the team will be very good this

season. IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Frobby Hangout Grand Counsel

Frobby

Posted
Posted
A good team like the O's don't need a whole lot added. The FA out there were not

worth what they were getting anyway. I believe the team will be very good this

season. IMO

The issue is very simple: did we do enough to offset the loss of Cruz and Markakis? Even if we should not have re-signed them at the contracts they got, was there more we should have done to replace them? Or are we fine just adding Snider and giving more playing time to the others who already were here? And if Dan was limited to about the payroll he now has, was there really a choice?

Ask me again in October.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Can_of_corn Hangout Grand Counsel

Can_of_corn

Posted
Posted

Agree with Gordo here, I haven't seen any of the talking heads explaining how they could have improved the O's offseason while staying in a reasonable budget.

If you can fault them for anything it would be faulting them for not taking on bad long term acquisitions to slightly improve their chances next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mayor McCheese All-Star

Mayor McCheese

Posted
Posted
Agree with Gordo here, I haven't seen any of the talking heads explaining how they could have improved the O's offseason while staying in a reasonable budget.

If you can fault them for anything it would be faulting them for not taking on bad long term acquisitions to slightly improve their chances next season.

I would have gone after Jason Heyward with the hopes of maybe extension, if not slap a QO and take the pick...2015 cost would equal De Aza and Snider.

Would have had to give up a good prospect or 2 but would have been a nice fit here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
weams Hangout Grand Counsel

weams

Posted
Posted
Yawn. When you win the division by 12 games, there's not a huge need for a B offseason.

Yeah, you just need to make sure that you don't have one of those crippling offseasons where you trade for Prince Fielder, and sign Shin-Soo Choo. Or give Max Scherzer a 20 year deal. Those are the kind of off seasons that really mess you up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
weams Hangout Grand Counsel

weams

Posted
Posted
I would have gone after Jason Heyward with the hopes of maybe extension, if not slap a QO and take the pick...2015 cost would equal De Aza and Snider.

Would have had to give up a good prospect or 2 but would have been a nice fit here.

Which two prospects would we have had to give up? And there are no extensions. Not unless you are re writing your Phillip Hughes deals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
waroriole Hangout Grand Counsel

waroriole

Posted
Posted
Yeah, you just need to make sure that you don't have one of those crippling offseasons where you trade for Prince Fielder, and sign Shin-Soo Choo. Or give Max Scherzer a 20 year deal. Those are the kind of off seasons that really mess you up.

It's kind of like saying we didn't do well in summer school. When you make A's, you don't have to go to summer school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Beef Supreme Hangout Veteran Council

Beef Supreme

Posted
Posted
I think it all depends on what you think you are grading. If all you are grading is gain or loss of talent, then D is a good grade. If you are grading maintaining a competitive team under circumstances where you have to give large raises to half the team and can't raise your payroll by an equivalent amount, then I think a B is on order.

This is how I see it, too. Plus, I think Travis Snider was a good acquisition. Dane de la Rosa might be one of the best under-the-radar acquisitions this winter by any team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing


  • Posts

    • Flash- bd
      How does Povich fit into your 2025 plans?

      By Flash- bd · Posted

      That's pretty good for his rookie season, no? I'm a bit confused by the characterization of his peripheral stats not being great. Yep, basically agree with this. With the favorite undoubtedly being Povich, and Rogers / Suárez (bullpen) / McDermott next up when the inevitable injury hits. 
    • CTBear
      Who will pay Burnes $400M this offseason?

      By CTBear · Posted

      I’m not entertaining the Adley trade ideas but I do like Seattle as a trade partner still. I think Luis Castillo is the guy we could get to give them some financial flexibility. JRod’s salary goes up this year and their other arms are very cheap so if we can absorb Castillo’s contract, it would cost us less prospect/trade capital. This is the type of deal I think we make if we can’t sign Burnes. 
    • Safelykept
      How does Povich fit into your 2025 plans?

      By Safelykept · Posted

      How do you Know that? And how does the BP keep him healthy? The only other pitcher i'm aware of for the O's that had a lat problem, was Richard Bleier, 2018 grade 3 strain required surgery> missed almost one year, went the next 4plus years injury free.
    • Moshagge3
      The Savannah Bananas are coming to OPACY

      By Moshagge3 · Posted

      I have good news about the sound system at OPACY.
    • Aristotelian
      Who will pay Burnes $400M this offseason?

      By Aristotelian · Posted

      I don't think there is any way we trade Adley. Also doubt Seattle is interested. However, regarding DH, his DH/C splits mirror his platoon splits and he mostly DH's as RHB when McCann plays C. Be careful not to confuse correlation with causation. This will be interesting to test if/when we have a lefty C option, i.e. Basallo.  Holliday or Mayo might interest them though. 
    • Pat Kelly
      Improving perfomance of players at Major League level

      By Pat Kelly · Posted

      Are the Orioles shortcomings mostly about the position player acquisition and development?    Pitching injuries were significant this year as even those pitching at the end were out for periods of time - Kremer, Eflin, Webb, Perez and obviously Danny Coulombe.  We could continue to argue that the O's internal pipeline needs to be more robust, but they do seem to have a knack for acquiring pitchers and improving them - Soto and Dominguez were better than they were with the Phillies along with the previously acquired relief core, Irvin did not pan out and Rogers remains a TBD but Bradish, GROD, Cano, Povich all seem to have benefitted from the approach of the pitching staff- one that included new coaches prior to this season.   Again Elias likes to dumpster dive (as do all GM's) but did pay up for Burns, Eflin, Dominguez and Rogers and spent/gambled perhaps unwisely on Kimbrel.   Could have spent more in terms of prosepct value for other trade deadline acquisitions, but would that have made a difference at the end given the offense/RISP issues?  Maybe the O's win a few more games 1-0? The primary issues seems to be the position players/hitting.  1) There has never been any major investment in PP acquisition other by trade FA signing.  Elias has moved most of his PP chips to the draft and internal development and only O'Hearn who was a waiver wire claim and designated for assignment (at least once after being acquired) saw any real offensive improvement.      2) If the equivalent of Slater,  Rivera and Jimenez, Soto, Pache, McCann etc had been pitcher acquisitions, the pitching staff would be horrific.  One would think if there is any method to offloading Cook, Hays, Norby, Cowser, Ortiz there would be at least 1 or 2 upside hitters that they O's could pick up.    Will agree that Urias and Mateo who came on board in 2022 were good acquisitions but the approach then was different - there were no internal options and they both played everyday primarily because of GG defense.   They were also given plenty of time to be both bad and good at hitting with no consquence or pressure.    3) 2024 Minor League PP promotions have not panned out so far.   Newly promoted players do not appear ready to field or hit, seem to regress.  HK, Jackson, Mayo - are all major investments together with Basallo and are huge future chips that frankly need to pan out and be developed correctly.    How much confidence do we have in this coaching staff to enable this group to reach their potential?  Gunnar and Westburg are exceptional players but were not rushed, had very few setbacks and suspect they would be good on any team - nothing special was done by O/s ML staff to make them better other than very early on with Gunnar who was drafted out of HS.  Both also got to play with slightly lower team expectations - 2022/early 2023.  4) Vet core players -  Mountcastle, Mullins, Santander are all streaky and most of their good stats are driven by bursts of productivity.    Santander seems on his own and HR's were a nice bonus this year but other parts of his games Walks, RISP have regressed.   Mullins is battling a chronic illness and remains an elite CF who needs a platoon partner for most LHP.       Mountcastle would appear to be a classic change of scenery player - will get better with a new team either because something clicks or a trade serves as a wake up call and everyone will complain about letting him go, but that's baseball. 5) Adley and Cowser - these two are probably the tipping point for me - What's up with Adley's full half season regression?    Cowser has improved but is miserable with RISP and inconsistent, but will he get better?  How the O's handle these two plus Jackson, HK, Mayo and Basallo will determine the future run of success.    Overall, what are the key factors for developing players into hitters that come through under pressure and when the games really matter?  Player readiness, coaching process, player familarity or loyalty to the O's system, innovative approach?   Seems like the O's hitting process remains a WIP and one that has not paid off to date.  Do we believe success is on the player or the coaching staff?  Do they need to be surrounded by a better veteran group/1-2 players that have won, take away some of the pressure, help to manage the clubhouse.    
    • Too Tall
      Wait Till Next Year

      By Too Tall · Posted

      Next year? Last year's playoff hurt. It was our first in a while and we didn't get any pitching. This year's playoff was downright embarrassing. We got great pitching and looked terrible at the plate. If this year's performance doesn't motivate those that return to improve all aspects of their game, I will be very surprised and disappointed. We were told last year was experience. Well this year was humiliation at all staffing levels. So, if that's part of "the process," learn and grow from it. Anxious to see what changes happen for 2025.

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...