Jump to content

Wieters Full Time DH?


weams

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 126
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Without Lough, Young is the fifth option as an outfielder.

When do you play Lough? Are you starting him over De Aza or Snider? If Young's not in the OF and Cruz isn't here, are you using him as defensive replacement? Does Pearce not make any starts against righties?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Young has trouble making this team, if I am in charge. Sorry, but that's my opinion.

Jones is a lock, and most likely Pearce is too.

If De Aza plays well, he is your other corner.

Snider and Lough are on the roster, until they show they can't contribute

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Young has trouble making this team, if I am in charge. Sorry, but that's my opinion.

Jones is a lock, and most likely Pearce is too.

If De Aza plays well, he is your other corner.

Snider and Lough are on the roster, until they show they can't contribute

Jones, Pearce, De Aza in the OF. Machado, Hardy, Schoop, Davis and #1 C (hopefully Wieters). That's 8 locked up spots. Second catcher and utility IF take up two bench spots, that makes 10. Barring a surprise, Delmon, Snider, and Lough take up the last three spots. Delmon and Snider split up DH, and Lough is the 4th OF.

Barring a surprise, I think Delmon makes it UNLESS they want to go with Wieters at DH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trying to figure out what happens if Wieters isn't ready to catch is almost impossible without the benefit of knowing what happens in ST. Too make variables.

Not in my opinion. Wieters can't catch in a major league game unless he's had several starts in game conditions beforehand. He can't go on a rehab assignment if he's been DHing for the major league club. Therefore, he starts the year on the DL if he's not ready to catch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jones, Pearce, De Aza in the OF. Machado, Hardy, Schoop, Davis and #1 C (hopefully Wieters). That's 8 locked up spots. Second catcher and utility IF take up two bench spots, that makes 10. Barring a surprise, Delmon, Snider, and Lough take up the last three spots. Delmon and Snider split up DH, and Lough is the 4th OF.

Barring a surprise, I think Delmon makes it UNLESS they want to go with Wieters at DH.

I think we only go with 12 position players and not 13; I think we have 13 pitchers (unless there is an injury or trade) due to having six starters and two Rule V guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not in my opinion. Wieters can't catch in a major league game unless he's had several starts in game conditions beforehand. He can't go on a rehab assignment if he's been DHing for the major league club. Therefore, he starts the year on the DL if he's not ready to catch.

If Wieters is hitting for a 900 OPS in ST, I don't see them DLing him. Russell has find ways to have him do catching drills under he is ready to catch in a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Wieters is hitting for a 900 OPS in ST, I don't see them DLing him. Russell has find ways to have him do catching drills under he is ready to catch in a game.

I don't think there are any drills that can replicate catching in a top-level competitive game. Also, I really don't care what Wieters hits in spring training. Clevenger hit .472 in spring training last year. Davis hit .405. Shoop hit .366. It's pretty meaningless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he is the April/May DH while limited to drills and his arm finishes healing, couldn't he just be optioned for a week or two like Gonzalez and Norris were last year? Give Bowie or Norfolk fans a 10-day thrill while depth holds down the fort.

It's interesting to me how the club's assessment of DeAza, Pearce and Snider factors into this. One of those guys would get a very small PT portion if this road is taken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he is the April/May DH while limited to drills and his arm finishes healing, couldn't he just be optioned for a week or two like Gonzalez and Norris were last year?

Because Wieters has more than five years of service time, they would need his consent in order to option him. Perhaps he'd do it, I don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we only go with 12 position players and not 13; I think we have 13 pitchers (unless there is an injury or trade) due to having six starters and two Rule V guys.

Between the DL, trades, and guys with options, DD will figure out how to get us down to 12 pitchers. It doesn't make sense to sign Delmon at a significant raise if we aren't going to use him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was wrong. Buck clarifies.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Buck says Wieters wouldn't break camp with the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/orioles?src=hash">#orioles</a> as strictly a DH. Has to be able to catch</p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="

">February 18, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was wrong. Buck clarifies.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Buck says Wieters wouldn't break camp with the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/orioles?src=hash">#orioles</a> as strictly a DH. Has to be able to catch</p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="

">February 18, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

That's the right move. Hopefully it isn't even an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we only go with 12 position players and not 13; I think we have 13 pitchers (unless there is an injury or trade) due to having six starters and two Rule V guys.

I haven't been posting here very much the last month or so' date=' but did I miss something? There's no real chance they're going to take [i']two [/i]Rule 5 players north, is there? On a competitive team it's usually hard to justify one. 13 pitchers and two Rule 5 guys makes me sort of nauseous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't been posting here very much the last month or so, but did I miss something? There's no real chance they're going to take two Rule 5 players north, is there? On a competitive team it's usually hard to justify one. 13 pitchers and two Rule 5 guys makes me sort of nauseous.

No chance at all. Realistically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Good point, no other metropolitan area has more than one team.
    • Could it be that they allowed the Gnats to reside within 30 minutes of their home. Effectively cutting their market in half? 
    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...