Jump to content

O's Sign Everth Cabrera


SticksandStones

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 424
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Which doesn't make any sense to me. Flaherty and Cabrera seem somewhat redundant to me. Why pay 2.4 million for a guy with some legal/disciplinary baggage when you already have an extremely similar player on the roster, one who already fits in with the club?

Can Flaherty steal 30 bases?

No, he can not so they are not redundant. Flaherty is an in case of emergency type of player but a good one to have around if he is needed. Cabrera is a potential starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can Flaherty steal 30 bases?

No, he can not so they are not redundant. Flaherty is an in case of emergency type of player but a good one to have around if he is needed. Cabrera is a potential starter.

Of course they are not exactly the same type of players, but they are very similar.

My point is even if Cabrera is a slightly better player than Flaherty, the marginal improvement is, in my estimation, not worth 2.4 million. We could save that money until the deadline and then use it toward fixing an actual hole rather than using it now for what might be a hole in the future, particularly in an area where we already have a decent amount of depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is past a minor league deal. It is a major league deal worth $2.4M.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

From the B-Sun:

Cabrera having a minor league option was an important part of the deal, and if he doesn’t perform well, the Orioles are comfortable paying him significant money to play in Triple-A.

http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/orioles/blog/bal-orioles-closing-in-on-oneyear-deal-with-former-allstar-everth-cabrera-20150218-story.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering we have Flaherty (and Nix stashed in the minors), this move doesn't make much sense to me unless they were planning on starting Schoop in AAA to work on his offense and extend his clock. If that's the thinking, I'm all for the move, but if we're just creating a situation where we're paying 2.4 million to a guy to take at-bats from Schoop, I don't really get it.

Based on the information we know, I agree with your thoughts here. The move makes little sense to me other than creating more competition, and at 2.4 million that's a high price just to try to motivate Schoop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course they are not exactly the same type of players, but they are very similar.

My point is even if Cabrera is a slightly better player than Flaherty, the marginal improvement is, in my estimation, not worth 2.4 million. We could save that money until the deadline and then use it toward fixing an actual hole rather than using it now for what might be a hole in the future, particularly in an area where we already have a decent amount of depth.

Depth is nice but is it quality depth? Just because Navarro and Janish are middle infielders doesn't mean they'll necessarily help. Cabrera has the ability to be our lead off hitter and starting 2B. Schoop is not ready as evidenced in his play last year. If Schoop does get better offensively then Cabrera replaces our back up IF who has no upside or use outside of defense. Cabrera can be a pinch runner. I think you're selling him short by comparing him to Flaherty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depth is nice but is it quality depth? Just because Navarro and Janish are middle infielders doesn't mean they'll necessarily help. Cabrera has the ability to be our lead off hitter and starting 2B. Schoop is not ready as evidenced in his play last year. If Schoop does get better offensively then Cabrera replaces our back up IF who has no upside or use outside of defense. Cabrera can be a pinch runner. I think you're selling him short by comparing him to Flaherty.

As I said before, if this is what the team is thinking and they're going to stick Schoop in AAA, then I'm totally on board with the move. Otherwise, I don't really get it. I don't hate it; I just think it's a somewhat strange use of resources.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said before, if this is what the team is thinking and they're going to stick Schoop in AAA, then I'm totally on board with the move. Otherwise, I don't really get it. I don't hate it; I just think it's a somewhat strange use of resources.

Yeah, I'll admit it caught me off guard. It doesn't seem like a move the Orioles would make in that it could potentially be over 2 million down the drain. But now that it seems likely to happen I find myself excited about it. Speed has been lacking since Roberts was in his prime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
    • I do not disagree with above posts.  Also I am pretty sure that this time last season, the Texas Rangers Hangout was saying the exact same things as the Rangers Pen.  Point being, you never know until you know.  The pen is shaky, but is capable of putting together a solid run from time to time.  
    • Roster Resource thinks it has tonight's lineup and Kjerstad on bench again. He is 7 AB shy of 130 MLB regular season AB with 3 games left, and if he ends up short some prospect list makers may still label him one.    If still with the Orioles, he will be 26 years old by Sarasota. I think the OP has its answer as it has been Cole and Lopez these two nights and the team is preparing for that intensity.
    • I care I bet the over on 88 wins, looked like a lock now not so much, come on O’s, daddy needs some new shoes
    • I’d have brought up Young immediately after DFAing Kimbrel. Baker has no place on this club this year. Would have been nice to see Young up here.
    • Yeah, but they could've brought him up a month ago and seen what they might have...And Im not "pining" for Brandon Young, just wondering if he's any better than some we have in the pen..
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...