Jump to content

Davis Did Not Receive a TUE For Adderall


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

I'll go with the data that I posted from a medical source.

And your information would be valid. The poster to whom I was replying seemed to have some sensitivity to the issue. This is not a dismissive, "they're the same, so a diagnosed individual could flip back and forth between meds" sort of thing, which seemed to be his takeaway from a few of the posts in here. Rather, they are the same to the point that we are not talking about a stim vs. an anabolic steroid here or any number of even closer diffferentiations. To the purposes of this thread and any reports that Davis did not receive an exception for adderall or wasn't using adderall or w.e., the difference is immaterial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Then who was their ace?  Yamamoto?  He pitched 90 innings last year, and went past 5 innings once in the post-season. That's an ace?
    • I just don't see a World Series in 2025 but do in 2026.  Not with Bradish and Wells on the shelf next year.  Play Mayo at 1B and allow him a year to improve, much like Gunnar. did in part in 2023.  In 2026 Mayo and Holliday will have a full year under their belts and the youngsters (Gunnar, Cowser, and Kjerstad) will also have another year to get acclimated to the majors.  If Elias can sign Buehler to a 3 year deal and have Povich with another year to improve i like our chances in 2026.  Thinking we are ready in 2025 is fools gold.
    • That wasn't the question. Jack Flaherty was not their ace. I don't care he was their gabe 1 starter
    • Seeing Forret named as a Top 10 Tony prospect nudged me to take a look at the 2023 draft. This is the one draft under Elias's tenure where he has taken a large number of pitchers. Still no 1st rounders, but 3 of the top 5 and 7 of the top 10 were all pitchers (in both '22 and '24, only 3 of our top 10 picks were pitchers). This draft could give us an idea of what it might look like if the O's were to emphasize pitching more consistently. We know Baumeister turned into two years of Eflin and Forret is a legit prospect. What about the rest of the class? Most are now in A+ and having some success. None have been pushed to AA.  The #3 pick, Kiefer Lord, had TJ, and Sharkey had a back injury, so there is definitely some injury risk. Interestingly, with Baumeister traded and Lord injured, the value currently appears to be in later rounds (that could change). All the rest either had a good ERA through their current level, at least one good peripheral, or both, indicating they remain legit prospects. German, Fruit, and Bragg are really interesting. Will be interesting to see where Tony puts them compared to Forret.  On the one hand, the 2023 class cuts against the narrative that Elias is focused only on college bats. It also shows the risks of burning higher picks on pitching. On the other hand, it shows what might be possible with a greater emphasis on pitching up and down the draft. It is possible that Forret or German becomes that elusive home-drafted/home-grown starting pitcher.  Baumeister (CB63) A+ 2.53 ERA Traded in Eflin deal Kiefer Lord (3/86) NA   TJ Levi Wells (4/118) A+ 6.71 high K/9 Jacob Cravey (6/181) A 5.27   Teddy Sharkey (7/211) A+ small sample   Braxton Bragg (8/241) A 3.36 5+ K/BB Fruit (9/271) A+ 3.03   German (11/331) A+ 1.78 11 K/BB Money (12/361) A 3.15 4.76 K/BB Riley Cooper (13/291) A 3.07   Forret (14/421) A+ 4.35 11.3 K/9 Zane Barnhart (17/511) A+ 2.47 high BB rate
    • When I see him as the Orioles 7th best prospect already when he was just drafted back in June it makes me realize how far the system has dropped. Now obviously a big  part of that is a good reason because of the graduations. 
    • The Dodgers just literally won a World Series 3 seconds ago and their Game 1 starter was the mid-season pick up Jack Flaherty.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...