Jump to content

Alex Hassan was designated for assignment


weams

Recommended Posts

Dumb question: Do you ever think teams conspire to hold each other's players?

Like the A's had Hassan on their roster earlier in the offseason but realized they had to cut him to make other moves. So they said "Hey Orioles, can you claim him until later in the season until things settle and then pass him back to us? We'll help you out later"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Dumb question: Do you ever think teams conspire to hold each other's players?

Like the A's had Hassan on their roster earlier in the offseason but realized they had to cut him to make other moves. So they said "Hey Orioles, can you claim him until later in the season until things settle and then pass him back to us? We'll help you out later"

Can't see it... But I guess anything is possible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad to hear the board think that Hassan won't be that useful. I mean that.

Sure he's behind Reimold and possibly Alvarez, but we can't see a situation where Reimold goes on the DL (I can't see him not going on the DL) and Alvarez struggles in ST and at AAA?

I could easily have seen a scenario in which Hassan was a contributor to the team. I can in no way see us carrying Garcia all season.

I mean, it's so not a big deal. And again, I'm glad to see the board think this is not really a loss. I just think guys like Hassan are very useful to have in the org.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad to hear the board think that Hassan won't be that useful. I mean that.

Sure he's behind Reimold and possibly Alvarez, but we can't see a situation where Reimold goes on the DL (I can't see him not going on the DL) and Alvarez struggles in ST and at AAA?

I could easily have seen a scenario in which Hassan was a contributor to the team. I can in no way see us carrying Garcia all season.

I mean, it's so not a big deal. And again, I'm glad to see the board think this is not really a loss. I just think guys like Hassan are very useful to have in the org.

Sure. I like Hassan. It appears he is still a bit behind with his surgery and I prefer Parmelee anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dumb question: Do you ever think teams conspire to hold each other's players?

Like the A's had Hassan on their roster earlier in the offseason but realized they had to cut him to make other moves. So they said "Hey Orioles, can you claim him until later in the season until things settle and then pass him back to us? We'll help you out later"

I think it is a silly suggestion simply because of the many teams in front of the Os and As in the waiver claim position.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Twice more this week.

He was released not designated.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Athletics?src=hash">#Athletics</a> have released OF Alex Hassan, who has been designated many times this year for assignment, per the league transactions page. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MLB?src=hash">#MLB</a></p>— Max Wildstein (@MaxWildstein) <a href="

">May 9, 2015</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Athletics?src=hash">#Athletics</a> may have done often-DFA'd OF Alex Hassan a favor -- PCL transactions page says he has been released, meaning no waiver exposure.</p>— Chris Cotillo (@ChrisCotillo) <a href="

">May 9, 2015</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was released not designated.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Athletics?src=hash">#Athletics</a> have released OF Alex Hassan, who has been designated many times this year for assignment, per the league transactions page. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MLB?src=hash">#MLB</a></p>? Max Wildstein (@MaxWildstein) <a href="

">May 9, 2015</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Athletics?src=hash">#Athletics</a> may have done often-DFA'd OF Alex Hassan a favor -- PCL transactions page says he has been released, meaning no waiver exposure.</p>? Chris Cotillo (@ChrisCotillo) <a href="

">May 9, 2015</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Also means 10 days without major league pay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Hm, seems like perfect situation for Akin as an opener, maybe game 3 if necessary? 
    • You are such a Rebel.
    • Another possibility: If you win game 1, maybe you don't ptich Eflin in Game 2 and try to win Game 2 without using him.   I mean, worst that can happen is you lose and have Eflin for game 3 anyway.   So you won't lose the wild card series without pitching your two best. But you COULD win the wild card series without your two best, and then you would have Eflin and Burnes lined up for games 1 and 2 in Cleveland
    • I like Law a lot, but that is a beyond asinine comment about not playing every day on a playoff team. You know how many playoff teams would slot him in the lineup immediately every game? Answer: the large majority. The Yankees would take Cowser over Verdugo The Tigers might not put him in over Greene/Meadows/Carpenter, but they’d DH him over their options. Cowser would start over every outfielder for the Royals, IMHO. He’d start over Meyers and Dubon for the Astros. The Guardians would probably start him over anybody not named Kwan in the OF, tbh.  I can keep going.
    • Even more of a reason to like FG over BBref,  tbh. Thanks, didn’t realize they switched this year. My point re: FIP is that I rather prefer it over RA/9, not to say it’s perfect. RA/9 treats all runs allowed by a pitcher the same regardless of them being earned or unearned. So, a pitcher on a team with a terrible defense is going to be judged much more harshly than somebody that pitches on a top tier defense. Not to mention the bullpen taking over mid inning dilemma. The funny thing is in your example re: FIP, RA/9 would have the first pitcher but love the second. Either way, these stats, like nearly all single solitary stats, aren’t best taken alone.  For your example, let’s say Pitcher A allowed weak contact and the defenders just had poor range, poor arms, whatever, but in the second example the defenders had great range and great arms making amazing plays to prevent any damage…then what?  Anyways, give me FIP over RA/9 was my point. But if you want to truly assess a pitcher, you’re going to need a few complimentary stats to go along with it.  
    • Really zooming the microscope in on one game with Tarik Skubal, would you consider batting Austin Slater 3rd or 4th to basically pinch hit in the 1st inning, and then replace him in LF with Cowser in the top of the 2nd inning. A tactic that might look good to the SIGBOT but could freak out actual ballplayers.
    • It would make sense. I think there are four possibilities for not announcing Eflin yet: 1. It’s going to be Eflin, we’re just waiting to announce to make it harder for Tigers/Royals to prepare. 2. Hyde and FO are discussing whether to slot Eflin for game 3 to possibly save him for ALDS game 1. 3. Hyde and FO are discussing a possible opener strategy for game 2. 4. Eflin has some minor aches/pains/soreness so we’re delaying the announcement to make sure he will be healthy enough. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...