Jump to content

Davis in Right; Pearce at 1B?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

I keep wondering if they want to get a guy like Ryan Howard to DH/1b. I know there is a huge don't go after an older "name" player crowd but to me Howard fits the DD/ Buck MO perfectly. He can play first base when needed whike primarily DHing allowing Pearce and Davis to get moved around as needed. At OPACY Howard could really be a 30+ HR threat again (and one more DD success story).

I can see a lineup that includes:

Cabrera 2b

Manny 3b

Davis RF

Jones CF

Howard DH

Hardy SS

Wieters C

Snider LF

Pearce 1b

Having Davis takeover RF just opens a lot of options IMO.

It's not like the phillies ballpark surpresses homers....

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I didn't see that. I thought Pearce was in his element at 1B. He played 1B very well IMO.

Pearce looked to be in the wrong place a couple of times. In fairness, if he had a chance to play 1B consistently, he would probably get some things ironed out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pearce looked to be in the wrong place a couple of times. In fairness, if he had a chance to play 1B consistently, he would probably get some things ironed out.

I think we saw a few instances where Davis's reach and athleticism would have helped with balls over pearces head or throws scooped.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pearce looked uncomfortable at 1B, to me. If the Orioles are pushed to move Davis off of first, I hope it's because they believe they need to make room for Parmelee. They may not want to risk playing Parmelee in the outfield, if it can be avoided, but they may want his bat at some point in the future.

Note-that sould be spelled Parmelee. I used to know that...

Not Jay Gibbons uncomfortable. Pearce and Davis just look different, Davis smoother. Mark Reynolds didn't look comfortable either and despite some mental errors, he certainly made some outstanding plays there. I do however prefer Davis size at first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's easy to believe. Probably would show that for most players, especially of the corner outfield/firstbase ilk.

Who is the Orioles' best firstbaseman, according to the metrics?

The O's 1B on the 40 man are Davis, Pearce, Flaherty, and Walker. In 4400 innings, Davis is a -1 UZR 150, Pearce is +9.8 in 1090 innings, Flash is -76 in 39 innings and there is nothing on Walker.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The O's 1B on the 40 man are Davis, Pearce, Flaherty, and Walker. In 4400 innings, Davis is a -1 UZR 150, Pearce is +9.8 in 1090 innings, Flash is -76 in 39 innings and there is nothing on Walker.

I guess Pearce wins that. But I'd still go with Davis at 1B because of another stat: +4" height.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pearce looked to be in the wrong place a couple of times. In fairness, if he had a chance to play 1B consistently, he would probably get some things ironed out.
This is one of the reasons for playing ST games. If Pearce is having problems playing 1B, they can work on these probllems.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say Davis is only behind Machado and Jones in terms of athleticism on the team. I remember him making a great play in Game 1 of the ALDS vs the NYY deep in the RF corner by that big garage door. I'm for whatever wins the most games. And I bet Boras would rather bring a RF'er than a 1B C.Davis to FA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In baseball, cold numbers just do not tell the WHOLE story. They are a good start, but should be adjusted for a multitude of things, as instincts for the position, size, etc. IMO Davis is a better first baseman, and Pearce a better outfielder. Both give 110% all the time, so neither will let the team down very often, at least not for lack of effort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pearce was a good short term replacement for Davis last year. I don't see him as an everyday first baseman and I don't think Buck does either. Davis may play a few games in right just to add another left handed bat but I don't see him out there on a regular basis. Buck says a lot of things to "stir the pot." Whether it's a motivational device or something else who knows. We have too mant outfield candidates as it stands. Why add another when it is unnecessary. With Pearce, Snider, Young, Lough. DeAza, and Reimold, we have enough corner outfield options. I give a leg up to Snider and Lough because they're left handed. Anyway, all this will resolve itself over the next few weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
    • I agree I missed the mark on a correct forum, and ask a moderator to please relocate to Rants as that game annoyed me yesterday. I appreciate the strong moderators here and know I'm not one of them.     Sorry for making it worse at a tough moment.    I won't bump it again, even ironically if we kick their butts in the playoffs.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...