Jump to content

Rey Navarro joins the utility infielder competition


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I am just trying to figure out why you think accumulated WAR is the biggest factor for Caberera but isn't for Lough.

The fact that Cabrera has shown at some point in his career to be a *good* player (THAT is why I mentioned WAR), and not that long ago, is something neither Schoop or Flaherty has ever done as a ML. You can twist what I said in whatever way you desire obviously. I completely understand the pro-Schoop crowd. He was rushed into the job, and he certainly has tools that could and hopefully will translate into a very good everday 2B. I do not understand the slavish loyalty to Flaherty, who has never shown any promise as a hitter, has no speed, and plays a decent 2B. His biggest asset is that he won't embarrass himself at other positions if they need him to move around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that Cabrera has shown at some point in his career to be a *good* player (THAT is why I mentioned WAR), and not that long ago, is something neither Schoop or Flaherty has ever done as a ML. You can twist what I said in whatever way you desire obviously. I completely understand the pro-Schoop crowd. He was rushed into the job, and he certainly has tools that could and hopefully will translate into a very good everday 2B. I do not understand the slavish loyalty to Flaherty, who has never shown any promise as a hitter, has no speed, and plays a decent 2B. His biggest asset is that he won't embarrass himself at other positions if they need him to move around.

I think you are overvaluing Cabrera based on one decent year out of 5.

Buck values Flaherty, and if he didnt show you that in Sept and the Playoffs, not sure what else I can say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't think I'm following your logic. That has nothing to do with anything.

I was just using guys, you mentioned in your own post.

I get it, you are not a Flaherty fan, but I think right now you are putting way too much into Cabrera.

Sorry, but my own opinion.

Getting this thread back on topic.

Navarro might really be something of a surprise, I like what another poster wrote and how he might be another Alomar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see choosing Flaherty in a situation where he had no other options (and where Cabrera certainly wasn't an option) has any bearing.

I liked the Navarro signing. But he has zero chance of making the OD roster. And that's ok. He has 3 options and it's worth seeing if he develops into something legit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just using guys, you mentioned in your own post.

I get it, you are not a Flaherty fan, but I think right now you are putting way too much into Cabrera.

Sorry, but my own opinion.

Getting this thread back on topic.

Navarro might really be something of a surprise, I like what another poster wrote and how he might be another Alomar.

What?

Gimmie a link, somehow I missed this.

Which Alomar are they referring to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What, the 6 years at SS where he averaged a -6 RS at SS? Or -7.3 UZR/150?

You honestly think Flaherty would be graded as a better defender at SS than Cabrera? Cabrera was a regualar for several years at that postion, Flaherty is never going to play SS full time anywhere . I bet he his better at 3rd but if Manny is healthy that isn't an issue. Cabrera has shown in the past an ability to get on base and can steal a bag. He gives the team a different dimension than Flaherty does. Ryan is a .220 hitter with some home run pop. He isn't good enough to pinch hit for anybody.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There wasn't exactly much choice. I don't get that argument. Paredes and Johnson were butchers.

When Manny got hurt and Davis was suspended that was when Flaherty got more playing time. Early in the year Manny was out and Hardy had some issues. Like you said what options did Buck have? I am not arguing that Cabrera would be better at 3rd but if Manny is playing who cares? If Buck wants to sit him for a game he could play Davis there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...