Jump to content

Go Duke!-beat Carolina


weemnj

Recommended Posts

UNC has now won 3 out 4 to Duke, so they are playing them well the last 2 years(although that stops next year).

But, where did losing 18 of 21 to them rank(now 18 of 23)? :D

Not fun, but remember my entire childhood as a fan, and most of my run as a student we kicked Duke's butt year after year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 337
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Imagine the inverse of that, and you'll know how we felt in 2000/2001.:D

I hear you... I cheered for Maryland in every one of those games, believe me. I root for Maryland for the most part against everyone else. I've always been a huge Gary Williams fan, I honestly think he's the best in game coach in the ACC , and has been since Coach Smith retired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just checked out Duke's recruits on the Rivals page and I HATE Kyle Singer already. He oozes Duke.:002_sbiggrin:

Coach Kldwoetsdkfndkgtewriaqdssdsski has taken a lot of grief from Dook Fans lately because of recruiting. He seems to have stepped it up a bit for next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coach Kldwoetsdkfndkgtewriaqdssdsski has taken a lot of grief from Dook Fans lately because of recruiting. He seems to have stepped it up a bit for next year.

Recruiting has been fine...For anyone to get on him about it is just being plain stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, he gets plenty of recruits. SG, does he purposely keep his bench short? In other words, he could probably recruit better players for positions 9-11 on his bench. He always has 7 good players, sometimes 8, but he those 9-11 players are pretty much worthless. Why doesn't he recruit deeper teams?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coach Kldwoetsdkfndkgtewriaqdssdsski has taken a lot of grief from Dook Fans lately because of recruiting. He seems to have stepped it up a bit for next year.

I would disagree that recruiting is the problem. Duke simply doesn't develop big men well. K is in love with small line ups and historically Duke gets beat by bigger more physical teams. Real tough to win against quality teams when your 4 goes 6'6" 200 lbs. Never played Thomas or Zoubek enough for them to develop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, he gets plenty of recruits. SG, does he purposely keep his bench short? In other words, he could probably recruit better players for positions 9-11 on his bench. He always has 7 good players, sometimes 8, but he those 9-11 players are pretty much worthless. Why doesn't he recruit deeper teams?

Maybe he just doesn't like it...Not sure.

Alot of people think Roy will cost UNC a title because they go to deep and give too many minutes to guys like Frasor and not enough to the other guys.

K will retire with several titles, seemingless endless final 4s and the most wins ever by any coach, so you can't really argue with him.

Likewise, Roy Williams has the highest all time winning %, has a title, numerous final 4s and will likely retire with close to 800 wins.

So, who are we to argue with either? Their success speaks for itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recruiting has been fine...For anyone to get on him about it is just being plain stupid.

I don't know if I agree, for a while there, they were getting top 10 guys who were becoming All Americans: ELton Brand, Shane Battier, Jason Williams, Carols Boozer, Michael Dunleavy Jr, and JJ Redick...The last few years have been dissapointing, let's be honest. Paulus and McRoberts have been solid, but not as spectacular as they and everyone expected, and then there's Michael Thompson and Kris Humphries, not to mention Lance Thomas and John Scheyer, who may be ok, but don't look like they;re ever going to be stars. I'll give you Henderson, who looks like he'll be a good one. Overall though, it's been getting worse the last few years. When you build one of the best programs in the nation, you gotta keep up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would disagree that recruiting is the problem. Duke simply doesn't develop big men well. K is in love with small line ups and historically Duke gets beat by bigger more physical teams. Real tough to win against quality teams when your 4 goes 6'6" 200 lbs. Never played Thomas or Zoubek enough for them to develop.

Thomas isn't a big man and has played plenty, including starting for a big part of the year and i think his game has developed very nicely.

Now, i do agree that K doesn't do as well with true centers...It will be interesting to see how Zoubek develops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe he just doesn't like it...Not sure.

Alot of people think Roy will cost UNC a title because they go to deep and give too many minutes to guys like Frasor and not enough to the other guys.

K will retire with several titles, seemingless endless final 4s and the most wins ever by any coach, so you can't really argue with him.

Likewise, Roy Williams has the highest all time winning %, has a title, numerous final 4s and will likely retire with close to 800 wins.

So, who are we to argue with either? Their success speaks for itself.

My question really wasn't to criticize. I just think Duke could have a few better players at the end of their bench to give their starters more of a blow.

I prefer the Roy Williams way, but I liked the old UNC model of putting an entire new 5 out there together. Helps with chemistry. Seems to me that Williams subs in and out so much that the players on the floor need to introduce themselves in order to know who they are playing with. Get about a seven man rotation. Then let the blue team (8-12) get after the other team for about 5-7 minutes a game. The other seven will stay better rested but play with more chemistry. You really wouldn't lose much with UNCs 8-12 on the floor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if I agree, for a while there, they were getting top 10 guys who were becoming All Americans: ELton Brand, Shane Battier, Jason Williams, Carols Boozer, Michael Dunleavy Jr, and JJ Redick...The last few years have been dissapointing, let's be honest. Paulus and McRoberts have been solid, but not as spectacular as they and everyone expected, and then there's Michael Thompson and Kris Humphries, not to mention Lance Thomas and John Scheyer, who may be ok, but don't look like they;re ever going to be stars. I'll give you Henderson, who looks like he'll be a good one. Overall though, it's been getting worse the last few years. When you build one of the best programs in the nation, you gotta keep up.

Humphries never came to school...Thompson wasn't good.

Scheyer is already a solid contributor, as is Thomas.

McRoberts was the high school player of the year and every guy you mentioned are McDs AA. Last year, they went to the sweet 16, won the ACC tourney and won around 30 games.

I do see anything as getting worse at all. They are down this year with no leadership, very little experience and lack that one guy(Henderson seems to be becoming that guy now though)who can take over the end of games.

Remember, they are 8 points away from being the #2 seed in the ACC tourney and owning a share of the regular season ACC tourney. If that were the case, they would be 25-6, a top 10 team and a definite #3 seed as of right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think John Scheyer is going to be extremely good in two years. He scares me.

Sure, I can see him becoming a very good player as well, but just look at some of those names I mentioned earlier, they don't have guys like that this year, that's all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • If we were to DH Kjerstad instead of O'Hearn it would be an entire starting 10 who had only played for the Orioles in their MLB career.   Wonder when the last time we ever had such a lineup (if ever).
    • Per Roch:   For the Orioles Gunnar Henderson SS Jordan Westburg 2B Anthony Santander RF Colton Cowser LF Adley Rutschman C Ryan O’Hearn DH Ryan Mountcastle 1B Cedric Mullins CF Ramón Urías 3B Cade Povich LHP For the Twins Manuel Margot RF Carlos Correa SS Byron Buxton CF Carlos Santana 1B Royce Lewis 3B Kyle Farmer 2B Ryan Jeffers DH Christian Vázquez C Willi Castro LF Pablo López RHP    
    • That would be pretty cool. Just do me a favor and please don't start the magic number thread in June next season.
    • There’s another accomplishment from 1983 I’d like to match.  
    • I'm more of a Prime Number guy, I'm happy enough with 89. Round numbers are for suckers.   Pretty disheartening they haven't managed to reach that relatively meager goal in 40 years.
    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...