Jump to content

Fangraphs: Travis Snider is a top 60 Outfielder


weams

Recommended Posts

There is a nice upside based on how Snyder finished last offseason and his approaching peak age - so the trajectory in performance will be combined with nice opportunity in 2015. Things are aligned for a possible breakout season. I think this is a shrewd acquisition by DD, but will have to see if it turns out as well on the field as it appears on paper before the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I think we were all feeling the same way last year about David Lough.

I personally thought we were getting a better mcclouth... And I still feel that way now. I would really like to see snider square one up, it's been a of bloops and ground balls.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know about the same, Lough doesn't have the power.

I'll give you similar, but Lough's ceiling isn't has high as Snyders.

People were excited about Lough because of his speed, base stealing, defense and his second half bat with KC. Players can be exciting even if they don't hit HR.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we were all feeling the same way last year about David Lough.

The difference being the pedigree. Snider was highly prized, rushed to the majors at a young age. The talent was never questioned.

Lough languished in the minors and was never highly regarded. He got a shot finally --at a late age to debut in the majors -- and did well for a few months. I think our hope for Lough was a bit of wishful thinking that the Orioles found a late-bloomer for basically nothing. Converting Danny Valencia into Lough qualifies as a very good DD trade.

Not to say that Snider couldn't fail to impress but I think they are not a good comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally thought we were getting a better mcclouth... And I still feel that way now. I would really like to see snider square one up, it's been a of bloops and ground balls.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

a different McClouth, maybe. McClouth had power and was a good base stealer with a liability for an arm. Lough has a far superior arm to Nate, has little power and we hoped would grow into becoming a comparable base-stealer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a different McClouth, maybe. McClouth had power and was a good base stealer with a liability for an arm. Lough has a far superior arm to Nate, has little power and we hoped would grow into becoming a comparable base-stealer.

I think if giving the amount of at bats, he could replicate Nate's 7 and 12 home runs.. But you're right, the comparison was more of him getting on base and stealing bases

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference being the pedigree. Snider was highly prized, rushed to the majors at a young age. The talent was never questioned.

Lough languished in the minors and was never highly regarded. He got a shot finally --at a late age to debut in the majors -- and did well for a few months. I think our hope for Lough was a bit of wishful thinking that the Orioles found a late-bloomer for basically nothing. Converting Danny Valencia into Lough qualifies as a very good DD trade.

Not to say that Snider couldn't fail to impress but I think they are not a good comparison.

I think you could say the same for Snider. Lough is 2 years older but has been worth more in 3 seasons than Snider has in 7. Chicks dig the long ball and pedigrees seem to last forever.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Top 60? Is that something to celebrate? 30 teams, 3 starting outfielders per team. That's 90 starting outfielders. So you are saying the Snider is in the top 2/3's. Almost sounds like a slam.

Well. Considering that we are evaluating against Nick. Who might make the to 70. And De Aza. Who might make the top hundred. And Lough. Who may make the top 150. And Bourbon who may make the top 300. And Alvarez who may be in the top 400 currently I thought the author was praising him. It's not like we are talking prospects. We are talking actually outfielders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Top 60? Is that something to celebrate? 30 teams, 3 starting outfielders per team. That's 90 starting outfielders. So you are saying the Snider is in the top 2/3's. Almost sounds like a slam.

No team carries only 3 outfielders. Top 60 puts a player in the upper half of major league outfielders. That is pretty darn good for what we paid..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I'm sure Holliday is mentally struggling in his own way, but he certainly hides it better than Cowser did haha. What I saw from Cowser on his face/body language last year is partly why I was so ready to send him out in a trade this offseason. Obviously, I was wrong as hell. And fortunately, I don't run the baseball team. : ) 
    • Sure but that doesn’t have to happen immediately.  You don’t say, well I’m keeping Kjerstad in the minors because I can only find 8-10 at bats a week for him.  That’s enough for the moment. Rather that than 25 at bats in AAA right now. Especially a guy like Kjerstad, who is getting “old” for the minors.  Norby is similar as well.
    • If Jackson Holliday turns out to be anywhere near the stratosphere offensively of a Derek Jeter, that will be a MASSIVE win for everyone! I disagree that he was rushed, he's was and is that good. He just hasn't shown it yet at this level. And no I don't think he has the athletic upside of Gunnar Henderson. NO ONE in the org does! So IMO that shouldn't be the standard of judgment. Given how little there is to gain with a Norby promotion, IMO it is better to use him as a trade chip. Lastly, no. Riding with the status quo through the through the season is not the correct move for a team seeking to win a World Series. It wasn't the right move last year and that played out with the results as our lack of quality top end pitching last season got exposed against the Rangers. IMO there is no need (especially with an overabundance of org talent) to take such a risk.
    • I really appreciate the in-depth answer, but I want to clarify something? Do I understand that when a minor leader is called up to the major leagues for the first time, he signs a new major league contract that will pay a larger salary, even if he is sent back to the minor leagues? And that is his new salary, no matter how long he remains in the minor leagues, until or unless he is called up to the majors leagues again in which case he gets a larger major league contract that will be in effect when he gets returned to the minors?
    • Cowser, to me, was clearly mentally struggling.  You could see it on his face, in his body language, in his movements on the field.  I fully supported sending him back down at the time. I personally don't see the same thing with Holliday.  Maybe a little hesitation in the field, but that also could be learning a new position.  But he seems composed, you see him in the dugout and he doesn't seem down on himself.  He celebrates with his teammates when good things happen.  He's generally not up there fishing for bad pitches.  I don't get the impression that he's in over his head at all from a mental standpoint. I'd say it's a combination of around 40% not quite ready, 40% just a badly-timed slump, and 20% luck.  He had some really tough calls go against him early on that made his ABs a lot more difficult. End of the day I don't really care what they do.  I wasn't clamoring for him to come up and I'm not going to be upset if he goes back down.  But I see no evidence that he needs some sort of reset.  
    • Well, I mean, Mayo seems basically ready now and I think we're talking about a pretty special hitter, there. Let's overact and say Mounty is having a breakout season based on this SSS...we're still talking about probably an .850 OPS season tops. Maybe I'm overly optimistic but I think Mayo can likely replicate that in his first full season (if we can find some ABs for him somehow this season, obviously, that'd be great) and the upside is much, much higher.  Would I package Mountcastle, Norby, and Stowers for a top arm? Yes. Would I package even a few of them for just a top relief arm? Perhaps, too, depending on the arm and the package. Next season we'll be getting into that part of the project where even the smallest upgrades we'll need to be aggressive in pursuing them. 
    • Giving Joey Ortiz a cup of coffee didn't do anything to his trade value. Cowser's probably did go down a bit due to the length and severity of his early struggles. Heck, I would have been OK with trading Cowser for Cease (I voted no, but more because of my view of Ortiz/Westburg). If Norby can pull an Evan Carter heater for a couple of weeks, who knows, it might work out the other way.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...