Jump to content

New York Post: Orioles and Chris Tillman working on Extension Before Start of Season


weams

Recommended Posts

I think this would be more to send a signal to the rest of the team about keeping the core than a strict baseball move. With three years of service time left and the fickle nature of pitchers, I would not extend Tillman.

I think that would be a very poor reason to extend Tillman.

My guess is that Tillman is to some degree agreeable to terms that the O's think are fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With three years of service time left, why assume any risk of guaranteeing anything beyond this year? Is an extension (let's assume a 5 year deal buying out two years of FA), worth the risk?

It could be if the terms are right. I wouldn't be interested in extending Tillman at market prices but for the right discount sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With three years of service time left, why assume any risk of guaranteeing anything beyond this year? Is an extension (let's assume a 5 year deal buying out two years of FA), worth the risk?

The assumption would be that there would be a discount for risk built in.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't just never extend any players because you're afraid of risk.

The Orioles are very picky about who they sign to long term contracts and so far, I'd say the Adam Jones one was good. The Nick Markakis one was good. The BRob one was not good. The Ubaldo one is (for the moment) not good.

Tillman has been an effective pitcher for four years, been pretty consistent, reasonably healthy, and established as a core player of the franchise. The Orioles have been kind to those types of players. There is risk, as there is with everything, but at some point the Orioles need to buckle down and figure out who's going and who's staying. The reality that a lot of players are going to walk is 6 months away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't just never extend any players because you're afraid of risk.

The Orioles are very picky about who they sign to long term contracts and so far, I'd say the Adam Jones one was good. The Nick Markakis one was good. The BRob one was not good. The Ubaldo one is (for the moment) not good.

Tillman has been an effective pitcher for four years, been pretty consistent, reasonably healthy, and established as a core player of the franchise. The Orioles have been kind to those types of players. There is risk, as there is with everything, but at some point the Orioles need to buckle down and figure out who's going and who's staying. The reality that a lot of players are going to walk is 6 months away.

That's pretty debatable if you ask me. I'd disagree.

As for Tillman, it will depend greatly on the terms. I'd side with going year to year with 3 years of control remaining, a lot of risk with pitchers in particular. However, I'm also someone who doesn't really think any of our starters are that irreplaceable, Tillman included. I don't want a deal anywhere near what I suspect he may get in free agency dollars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tillman has plenty of good years ahead of him. If you make the deal for long enough, you can actually assume a year will be lost due to TJ or major injury. I would either play the arbitration game until he is ready to be a FA, or lock him up for 5-6 years now. The worst would be a 3-4 year deal where you are counting on him to be healthy the whole time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's pretty debatable if you ask me. I'd disagree.

$64M for 10WAR over six* years isn't great, but better than a lot of long term contracts turn out statistically, plus they kept a fan favorite in Baltimore for four more years. I don't think you can affix a value to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

$64M for 10WAR over ten years isn't great, but better than a lot of long term contracts turn out statistically, plus they kept a fan favorite in Baltimore for four more years. I don't think you can affix a value to that.

Not very good when you evaluate extension deals though. Right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • To be fair, for this team it's a 5-game playoff loss streak. They had nothing to do with the previous 5 losses. In 2014 they ran into a very talented and hot team in the ALCS. Last year, they lost to the eventual WS champions. In 2016 it was the Britton non-usage fiasco. Each one has their own set of circumstances. We will see how far KC goes this year, but who's to say they aren't last year's Rangers? If they are, then I will say that the Orioles have been unlucky in whom they have drawn in the playoffs.
    • There's no need to throw most of our guys strikes.  Adley used to be that guy where you had to throw him strikes or else he'd be a threat to get on base but between his old man back and his smokeshow girlfriend, that ability has vanished. I was hoping we were past the teams of Adam Jones and Mark Trumbo and guys who'd just swing at everything and post low OBPs and offenses that'd only score if they were homering, but here we are. Someone was saying last night that the Royals pitching wasn't impressive, I disagreed.  They obviously had good scouting and knew that a guy like Tony would chase high out of the zone and they pitched him that way almost exclusively.  I'm sure everyone knows that Mountcastle will swing at a low and outside slider and expand the zone with two strikes.  No, the Royals did a fantastic job of pitching to our swing happy dickheads, they knew exactly what to do...they had a game plan and they executed it perfectly.  
    • They are clearly more talented. That’s why they won more games with more significant injuries. Plenty of players over OPS+100 and that’s with slumps.    This series was about the Orioles, not the Royals. 
    • I know oh the pain knowing he could of been an Oriole. I would trade Adley and Henderson straight up for Witt knowing how great a player he is and the added addition to him being signed for the next decade. 
    • The moneyball analytical approach might get you a playoff series win or two, but more often than not the teams that spend end up in the WS. I know there are some outliers like AZ last year, but most WS teams have a larger payroll. 
    • It better not be. I will be willing to bet this team WILL NOT be back in the playoffs if Elias doesn't make significant improvements on this team and then as Tony has said now he is on the chopping block if this team takes a step back . 
    • Showalter had a 5 game playoff losing streak but he also won the 2012 WC game, lost in 5 games in an extremely close ALDS as the underdog, and swept the 2014 ALDS before that streak. He also never lost to a team in the playoffs that was sub .500 if you take out their record against the worst team of all time.  The injuries were brutal and the offense sucked. That’s not on Hyde. But again, the team seemed mentally broken the last 3 months and never recovered. I really don’t care if he stays or is gone, but what happens if they start next year the same way they finished last year? Or what happens if they miss the playoffs or make them and completely flop again? You can’t just waste another year. Not saying bringing him back would be a waste. You just hope that this time next year, there’s no questioning if they should have made a change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...