Jump to content

Will 2015 Dictate The Rest of Matt Wieters' Career?


PressBoxOnline

Recommended Posts

Prior to this past off season, they have tried to get into extension talks, that's common knowledge. Show me an article that expressly says they tried this off season for one year as you seem to think.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I see your point. I would just hope MW would show some sense of gratitude to Buck for helping with his development. But I guess I am being na?ve.

Gratitude is not collectively bargained for. Did the Orioles show Manny gratitude when they renewed his contract last year? No, nor should they. It is a business and there is no evidence to suggest that giving a player extra money early makes any difference once they reach free agency. Players understand that they are underpaid every step of the way until they reach free agency. So they would be silly to show gratitude to delay free agency if they aren't compensated for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prior to this past off season, they have tried to get into extension talks, that's common knowledge. Show me an article that expressly says they tried this off season for one year as you seem to think.

I thought the complaint from the Boras camp was that DD wasn't taking to them????????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am no expert on WAR, but that is as a catcher, correct? With a good arm, correct?

A long-term deal assumes he will remain at catcher...and likely that will not occur.

WAR is great and all, but perspective is important too.

You think it's likely that Wieters won't return to being a catcher? Based on what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You think it's likely that Wieters won't return to being a catcher? Based on what?

I don't think it's unreasonable to question whether Wieters will be primarily a catcher as he enters his 30s. Joe Mauer hasn't caught more than 75 games in a season since 2010 (when he was 27).

Matt could definitely be entering a phase of his career where ~70-90 games at catcher is more realistic than ~140.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it's unreasonable to question whether Wieters will be primarily a catcher as he enters his 30s. Joe Mauer hasn't caught more than 75 games in a season since 2010 (when he was 27).

Matt could definitely be entering a phase of his career where ~70-90 games at catcher is more realistic than ~140.

Considering there were only 10 individual seasons over the last 10 years where a catcher caught 140 games in a season, this is obviously true. I think the more likely scenario though is that he catches 100-120 games a season for the next 4 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too many players surrender control to the agent and then say "It's not up to me", which is a complete abdication of responsibility.

I've learned it's better to be loyal than a gypsy. I think Wieters is mentally gone and the Orioles know it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You think it's likely that Wieters won't return to being a catcher? Based on what?

I think there are question marks, but what I meant was the contract he will sign-he will not be catching that whole time, clearly.

Based on watching baseball:) Knees, the wear and tear on a player's body. Few can catch their whole careers particular with a bat that is above average.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too many players surrender control to the agent and then say "It's not up to me", which is a complete abdication of responsibility.

I've learned it's better to be loyal than a gypsy. I think Wieters is mentally gone and the Orioles know it.

Part of my point. Frustrating that MW wouldn't have more loyalty. But what you and I, the fan, would do and they do aren't the same things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too many players surrender control to the agent and then say "It's not up to me", which is a complete abdication of responsibility.

I've learned it's better to be loyal than a gypsy. I think Wieters is mentally gone and the Orioles know it.

Why should they be loyal? It is a business. If the Orioles cared about Matt Wieters long term earnings then he wouldn't have averaged 132 games started behind the dish from 2011-2013.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wieter's career trajectory started declining after several years in the bigs when he demonstrated that he will never hit enough to be a 1B/DH. Since then it has been just waiting for the inevitable injuries to rob him of his catching ability. The TJ surgery has sped up the process by a couple of years. I don't expect him to catch more than 50 games this year, and I'd be amazed if he had an OPS >.700

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering there were only 10 individual seasons over the last 10 years where a catcher caught 140 games in a season, this is obviously true. I think the more likely scenario though is that he catches 100-120 games a season for the next 4 years.

Would you prefer 120 as the marker? Regardless, Wieters is entering the phase of his career where he can't be relied upon as an "everyday" catcher - and his bat is insufficient to justify many at bats at any other position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you prefer 120 as the marker? Regardless, Wieters is entering the phase of his career where he can't be relied upon as an "everyday" catcher - and his bat is insufficient to justify many at bats at any other position.

120 is probably still too high. By that metric there were only 7 everyday catchers in MLB last year. Regardless, there are plenty of players in their 30's that are their team's primary catcher. In the last couple years Ellis, Molina, Ianetta, Pierzynski, McCann, Martin and Suzuki have all been their team's primary catchers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wieter's career trajectory started declining after several years in the bigs when he demonstrated that he will never hit enough to be a 1B/DH. Since then it has been just waiting for the inevitable injuries to rob him of his catching ability. The TJ surgery has sped up the process by a couple of years. I don't expect him to catch more than 50 games this year, and I'd be amazed if he had an OPS >.700

I would still put money on Wieters finishing this season with an OPS > .700. As for his hitting, while he would be a below average bat at DH and first base at this point, I think it is a fair assumption that he would improve to average if he wasn't catching 130+ games a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Oh, I'd love to have one come through our system by being drafted and developed. No doubt at all. 
    • Paging @Tony-OH to the thread.  🤣 I've actually advocated for this in the minors forums...letting other teams draft and try to develop guys to see which have a shot of sticking and which don't.  Essentially let other teams make mistakes in the draft and trade for guys that are still in the lower levels in other systems but you think have a shot.  I do believe that's part of Elias's strategy....as risk adverse as he is, he's not going to take risks on drafting pitching if he views that's the biggest risk in the draft. All I'm saying it'd be nice to have a Skubal come through our system.  Does anyone really disagree with drafting and developing a Cy Young winner or is that something you guys aren't interested in?
    • Oh, I get that. I just think you'd be hard pressed to say year in and year out the Central is anything but a mediocre division.  Typically, the AL East has at least 3 strong teams, with some seasons where 4-5 of them have winning records or close to it.  But it doesn't matter. As said before, I've been saying for weeks prior to the end of the season that the Tigers were a very good team. I just wouldn't trade our org, team, farm, whatever for the Tigers. 
    • Does it matter if they get drafted and developed vs. traded for and developed? Hell, the O's starting rotation was a strength this year. Here's a breakdown of how it was constructed: Burnes - traded for (Elias) Suarez - free agent (Elias) Kremer - traded for (Duquette) Eflin - traded for (Elias) Grayson - drafted (Duquette) Bradish - traded for (Elias) Povich - traded for (Elias) Irvin - traded for (Elias) Tyler Wells - Rule V (Elias) Rogers - traded for (Elias) McDermott - traded for (Elias) Means - drafted (Duquette) I'm excluding Bowman being an opener and getting a starting credit.  But that said, out of all of the starters that the O's used this year, none were drafted by Elias, and only 2 were drafted by the O's (GRod, Means). 8 were acquired via trade (7 by Elias, 1 by Duquette), and 2 via FA or Rule V.  I don't necessarily think that Elias needs to draft starters to build a rotation, but it would be nice to see a couple make it before being traded, TBH.  That said, I don't think the above is sustainable, but the strategy would be sustainable if you have free agency play a bigger part. Look at the Royals. Their best 3 starters weren't drafted by them (Ragans - traded for, Wacha - FA, Lugo - FA). 
    • Unfortunately, it's looking like there is a lot of truth in that statement.  I believe Steve Bisciotti (Ravens owner) once said, he wanted to have a good team every year, get into the playoffs enough, eventually things go your way and win the Super Bowl.  This was in response to playing salary cap games for a few seasons and then eventually having to pay the piper with the dead money and being uncompetitive for a few years. Hopefully the O's can be consistently good and get hot at the end of the season and make a run through the playoffs.  Go back to June 1st and the five best teams in the league were the Orioles, Yankees, Guardians, Phillies and Dodgers.  Two are already out, Guardians fading fast with the Yankees and Dodgers still alive.   A Tigers - Mets World Series would be quite fitting.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...