Jump to content

"It's kind of who we have to be."


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Averageish starters? SMH

You do realize that just about every MLB team is struggling to find quality arms to fill out their 5 man rotation?

Yes, if you like ERA they are above average, which is what I was getting at. Outside of ERA however, not a whole lot to like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poor Buck he's so retro. Someone needs to explain FIP to him.

"So you see Buck, your team really isn't that good! They shouldn't be winning all these games and preventing all these runs! You might want to retire now before the inevitable collapse so you can look like even more of a genius!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, if you like ERA they are above average, which is what I was getting at. Outside of ERA however, not a whole lot to like.

I like Victories, and this team is has more victories than the other teams for the past 3 years total.

I went through 14 years of a very black hell watching this team field some very bad teams and was out of the running before 1 June for most of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Victories, and this team is has more victories than the other teams for the past 3 years total.

I went through 14 years of a very black hell watching this team field some very bad teams and was out of the running before 1 June for most of the season.

As do I, and I admitted the current system works. Average starters coupled with outstanding defense equates to above average run prevention at bargain prices. I'm hoping they keep the cost effective part going, otherwise the model potentially breaks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As do I, and I admitted the current system works. Average starters coupled with outstanding defense equates to above average run prevention at bargain prices. I'm hoping they keep the cost effective part going, otherwise the model potentially breaks.

I guess we can just agree that our own definition of average is probably just a shade different.

For all particular purposes, Norris was the #5 SP last year, he went 15-8, not 10-12, or 13-11, which is what average starters do.

I would call our guys, Good, not great or Elite, but, I would not call them average.

Sorry, just me and my own opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess we can just agree that our own definition of average is probably just a shade different.

For all particular purposes, Norris was the #5 SP last year, he went 15-8, not 10-12, or 13-11, which is what average starters do.

I would call our guys, Good, not great or Elite, but, I would not call them average.

Sorry, just me and my own opinion.

Yes, if pitcher record is even a tool you use for evaluation, there is not a conversation to be had here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, if pitcher record is even a tool you use for evaluation, there is not a conversation to be had here.

Yes, I know, W-L is never allowed to be used in a discussion about a pitcher's merit.

But, at the end of the season, you have to look at the end results, and give credit to the guys for having got you there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess we can just agree that our own definition of average is probably just a shade different.

For all particular purposes, Norris was the #5 SP last year, he went 15-8, not 10-12, or 13-11, which is what average starters do.

I would call our guys, Good, not great or Elite, but, I would not call them average.

Sorry, just me and my own opinion.

I agree with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I know, W-L is never allowed to be used in a discussion about a pitcher's merit.

But, at the end of the season, you have to look at the end results, and give credit to the guys for having got you there.

W-L record is often used by many people when discussing pitchers. The problem is it's not a very good tool for measuring a pitcher's effectiveness. It's good at showing how well a team has played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found this quote from Buck the other day very telling:

http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2015/03/hearing-from-showalter-after-5-2-loss.html

Bottom line, Buck has constructed his team a certain way. Put good fielders in the field, avoid mistakes, don't give the other team free bases, and make the other team beat you. Maybe the pitchers don't "pitch to contact," but they aren't afraid of what will happen if the hitters do make contact.

You know what? It works.

That's why Buck is the boss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • This reminded me of, in the 90’s, anecdotally, every year, Mussina would have at least one outing where he’d just get absolutely SHELLED.  
    • If he throws that many hittable pitches in the heart of the plate against the Yankees (or any Major League team for that matter) he is likely to get a similar result. 
    • Nick Pollack's write up mentioned the BABIP, though certainly watching that performance it was the kind of performance to make you think Voros McCracken and DIPS theory is hokum. I don't think it was random variation getting pummeled there last night.     Hopefully the Angels didn't find any cues the Yankees might also be able to benefit from.
    • Baseball’s a funny game.  We spend 1.4M on Carter Young who played at D1 powerhouse Vanderbilt and he hasn’t looked too good so far in his pro career.  A year later in the 20th round, we pick Vazquez from North Greenville University (sorry. Never heard of it), sign him for 30k and he puts up an .822 OPS at Delmarva.  This year both Vazquez and Young are at Aberdeen and it’s not too difficult to guess which one is the better prospect. In 46 PA, Vazquez has 12 walks to 7 strikeouts and a .933 OPS.  In addition, he’s stolen 7 bases in 8 tries.   @Tony-OH also has said he’s a good defensive SS. 2023 draft.  Etzel in the 10th.  Vazquez in the 20th.  Nice job, scouts.
    • They may be a way to start him out. But I hope that is not the plan long term. If you had a chance to listen to Hyde's comments they appear to be trying to build Bradish back up into a regular starter. He talked about him building toward 80 pitches in his next rehab outing. In order for this team to get where it wants to go, we will need the Bradish of last year (or a comparable pitcher to that).
    • Hopefully Means gets a rehab extension for another 30 days. If not, this seems right to me. Does Bradish go to the pen, or does he start with one of Suarez, Kremer, or Irvin pushed to the pen? I kind of like Bradish as an opener with Irvin backing him up most of his starts.
    • He threw that fastball right down the shoot on a 1-2 count. That was not a case of Trout being Trout. It was a case of horrible location. I have to believe that it was not his intention to throw it there after he watched us beat Trout several times the night before with hard stuff up in the zone (Trout's only weakness). Maybe the extra day messed up something with Rodriguez's ability to execute? Maybe he just had a bad night? But this was not the case of the Angels being good. It was Grayson who was really bad.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...