Jump to content

Start Gausman out at AAA


eddie83

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 216
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Well, my thing is Gausman is easily our 3rd best starter. You could argue for him being the best based on his finish in the playoffs last season. He should be pitching in the first series.

I think he could be as well. I still think they aren't banking on him for 30-32 starts and want him as fresh as possible at the end of the year. If hs doesn't start a game until April he is still going to make 27-28 starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know you don't but you aren't trying to massage ego's in the clubhouse. Miguel doesn't come across as that kind of a guy but still. Either way whoever the 6th starter is should go to AAA.

Kevin Gausman by no stretch of anyone's imagination could be considered the sixth best starting pitching candidate on this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know you don't but you aren't trying to massage ego's in the clubhouse. Miguel doesn't come across as that kind of a guy but still. Either way whoever the 6th starter is should go to AAA.

And what if Gausman is "that kind of a guy"? Then wouldn't the proper type of massage be keeping him and sending down Miguel?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kevin Gausman by no stretch of anyone's imagination could be considered the sixth best starting pitching candidate on this team.

We all know that. Who aren't you starting then? I think the whole thing of who is in the rotation at the start of the year is overblown. I am not advocating letting him rot at AAA. You are talking 4 starts max missed in April. They are trying to buy time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And what if Gausman is "that kind of a guy"? Then wouldn't the proper type of massage be keeping him and sending down Miguel?

Miguel has been up here longer than Gausman. Two full seasons on the roster and another half year. Miguel isn't making 30 plus starts either. Too much concern with who stars out the year there in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all know that. Who aren't you starting then? I think the whole thing of who is in the rotation at the start of the year is overblown. I am not advocating letting him rot at AAA. You are talking 4 starts max missed in April. They are trying to buy time.

Gonzalez if Norris can turn it around. If Norris is not getting any better in his next couple of starts I sit him down with my medical staff and make absolutely sure he's healthy. Then I tell him he has two choices, he can pitch out of the BP just like Jimenez did or he can go on the DL until he's healthy. With Ubaldo setting the precedent last year and doing it without complaining he'll look like a jerk if he doesn't accept it gracefully and if he isn't completely healthy that would explain quite a lot.

Either way, I send down someone who isn't as good as Gausman and that is the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both Gausman and Gonzalez will stay on the major league roster for the simple reason that they are better than Matusz and Webb. Matusz and Webb will be traded or DFA'd and sent to Norfolk.

Just your opinion though. Right? And if it works out differently, it's not because someone is being paid to sabotage under the table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Oh, I'd love to have one come through our system by being drafted and developed. No doubt at all. 
    • Paging @Tony-OH to the thread.  🤣 I've actually advocated for this in the minors forums...letting other teams draft and try to develop guys to see which have a shot of sticking and which don't.  Essentially let other teams make mistakes in the draft and trade for guys that are still in the lower levels in other systems but you think have a shot.  I do believe that's part of Elias's strategy....as risk adverse as he is, he's not going to take risks on drafting pitching if he views that's the biggest risk in the draft. All I'm saying it'd be nice to have a Skubal come through our system.  Does anyone really disagree with drafting and developing a Cy Young winner or is that something you guys aren't interested in?
    • Oh, I get that. I just think you'd be hard pressed to say year in and year out the Central is anything but a mediocre division.  Typically, the AL East has at least 3 strong teams, with some seasons where 4-5 of them have winning records or close to it.  But it doesn't matter. As said before, I've been saying for weeks prior to the end of the season that the Tigers were a very good team. I just wouldn't trade our org, team, farm, whatever for the Tigers. 
    • Does it matter if they get drafted and developed vs. traded for and developed? Hell, the O's starting rotation was a strength this year. Here's a breakdown of how it was constructed: Burnes - traded for (Elias) Suarez - free agent (Elias) Kremer - traded for (Duquette) Eflin - traded for (Elias) Grayson - drafted (Duquette) Bradish - traded for (Elias) Povich - traded for (Elias) Irvin - traded for (Elias) Tyler Wells - Rule V (Elias) Rogers - traded for (Elias) McDermott - traded for (Elias) Means - drafted (Duquette) I'm excluding Bowman being an opener and getting a starting credit.  But that said, out of all of the starters that the O's used this year, none were drafted by Elias, and only 2 were drafted by the O's (GRod, Means). 8 were acquired via trade (7 by Elias, 1 by Duquette), and 2 via FA or Rule V.  I don't necessarily think that Elias needs to draft starters to build a rotation, but it would be nice to see a couple make it before being traded, TBH.  That said, I don't think the above is sustainable, but the strategy would be sustainable if you have free agency play a bigger part. Look at the Royals. Their best 3 starters weren't drafted by them (Ragans - traded for, Wacha - FA, Lugo - FA). 
    • Unfortunately, it's looking like there is a lot of truth in that statement.  I believe Steve Bisciotti (Ravens owner) once said, he wanted to have a good team every year, get into the playoffs enough, eventually things go your way and win the Super Bowl.  This was in response to playing salary cap games for a few seasons and then eventually having to pay the piper with the dead money and being uncompetitive for a few years. Hopefully the O's can be consistently good and get hot at the end of the season and make a run through the playoffs.  Go back to June 1st and the five best teams in the league were the Orioles, Yankees, Guardians, Phillies and Dodgers.  Two are already out, Guardians fading fast with the Yankees and Dodgers still alive.   A Tigers - Mets World Series would be quite fitting.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...