Jump to content

The O's will lead all of baseball in home runs this year


wildcard

Recommended Posts

I agree! Also, I think Reimold could take at bats away from Delmon, Snider, and maybe even De Aza, which would make for a more powerful lineup (Reimold has a higher ISO than all of them).

If Reimold can take over LF instead of De Aza, the lineup would have 20+ HR potential from 1 to 9.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I agree! Also, I think Reimold could take at bats away from Delmon, Snider, and maybe even De Aza, which would make for a more powerful lineup (Reimold has a higher ISO than all of them).

If Reimold can take over LF instead of De Aza, the lineup would have 20+ HR potential from 1 to 9.

I agree. But in projecting I have to look at track record. Reimold's track record is he will last about a month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No other team hit 200 homers last year. The O's are unique with their power.

Somebody pointed out that in the last three years, there have been seven instances of a team that hit 200+ homers -- the Orioles three times, and four other teams once (all in 2012). So yes, we are unique, and our ballpark is suited for power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somebody pointed out that in the last three years, there have been seven instances of a team that hit 200+ homers -- the Orioles three times, and four other teams once (all in 2012). So yes, we are unique, and our ballpark is suited for power.

In the summer. Balls die until it gets warm. Its almost like playing in two different parks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somebody pointed out that in the last three years, there have been seven instances of a team that hit 200+ homers -- the Orioles three times, and four other teams once (all in 2012). So yes, we are unique, and our ballpark is suited for power.

What that myth/fact that the Hotel now keeps some HR balls in the park?

Is this fact or myth?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What that myth/fact that the Hotel now keeps some HR balls in the park?

Is this fact or myth?

It's a myth if you believe the ballpark HR factors published by fangraphs. The HR factor was at 107 in 2007, the year before the hotel was built, and it has never been any lower than that since then, and has been as high as 110. Before 2007, it was as low as 101 in some years, and never higher than 107.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just the way I have always done it. I am comfort there. Some of the places I use to do the analysis don't even list PAs. Not that I can't find them if I wanted them.

I am not that nerdy. I am not a saber guy. Just an old school O's fan.

I wouldn't call PA a nerdy stat. They've been using it to determine who qualifies for the batting title as long as I've been alive. But like I said, whatever. The assumptions about playing time will be clear enough no matter which one you use.
Yes, but you are a youngster.

I remember when Ted Williams lost a batting title in 1954 because he did not have enough at-bats, although he had more than enough plate appearances in today's formula (3.1 x 154, which was the number of games that major league teams played that season.)

No, I don't really remember that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember when Ted Williams lost a batting title in 1954 because he did not have enough at-bats, although he had more than enough plate appearances in today's formula (3.1 x 154, which was the number of games that major league teams played that season.)

No, I don't really remember that.

But your point is well taken. A patient hitter could have a difference of 100 between PA and AB. That's a significant number of PA not accounted for.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they lead the league in home runs again they will probably be near the bottom in least pitches seen per at bat. I know I'm repeating myself but this has been a problem for a while and I'm disappointed that the FO hasn't made more of an effort to fix it.

That said, hopefully Schoop continues to improve, hits for a higher average and has better plate discipline. He has a ton of upside both offensively and defensively and I'm glad the Orioles are being patient with him and letting him play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they lead the league in home runs again they will probably be near the bottom in least pitches seen per at bat. I know I'm repeating myself but this has been a problem for a while and I'm disappointed that the FO hasn't made more of an effort to fix it.

That said, hopefully Schoop continues to improve, hits for a higher average and has better plate discipline. He has a ton of upside both offensively and defensively and I'm glad the Orioles are being patient with him and letting him play.

Yes, you keep trolling the same thing over and over.

We get it, you don't like the FO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they lead the league in home runs again they will probably be near the bottom in least pitches seen per at bat. I know I'm repeating myself but this has been a problem for a while and I'm disappointed that the FO hasn't made more of an effort to fix it.

That said, hopefully Schoop continues to improve, hits for a higher average and has better plate discipline. He has a ton of upside both offensively and defensively and I'm glad the Orioles are being patient with him and letting him play.

How is seeing less pitches per plate appearance a problem?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they lead the league in home runs again they will probably be near the bottom in least pitches seen per at bat. I know I'm repeating myself but this has been a problem for a while and I'm disappointed that the FO hasn't made more of an effort to fix it.

That said, hopefully Schoop continues to improve, hits for a higher average and has better plate discipline. He has a ton of upside both offensively and defensively and I'm glad the Orioles are being patient with him and letting him play.

Don't know where they ranked in P/PA in MLB but I do know they did better in that dept. than DET, KC, LAA, and WS winner SF.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
    • I miss the "Throwin' Swannanoan".......  
    • So what do the Rays do?   Spend a lot of money fixing the roof for the few remaining years that ballpark has left?   Or do like the A's and play in a minor league facility until their new ballpark is built? I wonder if they could work out something with the Yankees to play in Steinbrenner Field.   It is in Tampa and one of the nicer spring training facilities on the Gulf Coast.   The Rays train in Port Charlotte which is (50???) miles south and I don't think the facility is nearly as good.   Steinbrenner FIeld seats over 10K, has luxury boxes, and a very accessible location for Tampa area fans.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...