Jump to content

Top 2008 Draft Prospects: Yonder Alonso


Recommended Posts

Key: (X) is their age at the time of the 2008 Draft

9. *Yonder Alonso {College 1B/DH, Miami} (21) Alonso, ranked as Baseball America's #5 College prospect, does one thing very well... hit. He is not overly athletic, nor plays a particularly good defensive 1B, but if a team wants a young hitter who can sting the ball, take a walk, and has a keen batting eye, then the 6' 2-215 Alonso is your man. As a sophmore at Miami, he posted in 61 games> a .376 BA, 18 HR's, 74 RBI, 64 walks, a .519 OBP and slugged .705!

I am of the opinion that he'll settle in at DH, and would be surprised to see a National League team take him. I can see him eventually succeeding as a middle of the order DH, ala David Ortiz, although I don't think he'll be the hitter Ortiz is (not many are). Yonder has a reputation as being less than well-conditioned, and hasn't spent a great deal of time working on his defense... so, one can draw the conclusion that he has ridden his considerable talents up to this point, but may stumble at the pro level with those issues. However, were Alonso to show marked improvement in those areas, he could certainly stick at 1B.

Greg's Grade= 84

Next: High School OF/RHSP, Aaron Hicks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't sound like a guy to get excited about, despite his terrific numbers. Kind of limited if he's projected to be a DH.

This season is important in my view for Alonso, more from a work-ethic and defensive improvement aspect then as a hitter. He may show that he's able to play 1B, and thus have all teams, including the NL ones, considering him. Personally I would not want him as a first rounder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless he bats a 1.300 OPS with 30+ HR, I don't see Yonder moving up to the 4th slot--not with Smoak, Beckham, Alvarez, and a couple of pitchers likely to compete for the top 3 slots.

Hosmer/Alonso will be an interesting pair. Which goes first and who ends up the better pro player. Hosmer's demands may fall a bit if ASU ends up in trouble, making him more easily draftable for more teams. Both should be top 10 guys based on talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This season is important in my view for Alonso, more from a work-ethic and defensive improvement aspect then as a hitter. He may show that he's able to play 1B, and thus have all teams, including the NL ones, considering him. Personally I would not want him as a first rounder.

You wouldn't take him in the first round? I understand the concerns you're listing, but the kid can flat out hit -- average and power -- and he gets on base. If he doesn't go in the top 10 I'd be pretty surprised, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You wouldn't take him in the first round? I understand the concerns you're listing, but the kid can flat out hit -- average and power -- and he gets on base. If he doesn't go in the top 10 I'd be pretty surprised, no?

I agree with this, especially considering the potential signability of some of the other guys. This guy tore up the Cape league this past summer and has put up very nice numers in college. I could definitely see him going to SF or the White Sox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with this, especially considering the potential signability of some of the other guys. This guy tore up the Cape league this past summer and has put up very nice numers in college. I could definitely see him going to SF or the White Sox.

CHA could be a very good fit. I don't think CIN bites, and I think SF takes whoever is left out of Alvarez/Beckham/Smoak/Matusz/Crow -- maybe Hosmer is ASU falls off and he is disuaded from college ball enough to drop his demands. FLA will hopefully take Martinez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CHA could be a very good fit. I don't think CIN bites, and I think SF takes whoever is left out of Alvarez/Beckham/Smoak/Matusz/Crow -- maybe Hosmer is ASU falls off and he is disuaded from college ball enough to drop his demands. FLA will hopefully take Martinez.

I don't know on SF. If there's an easier sign there for them that they rate close to the Boras guys, they may go for that player. I could see them taking Skipworth, Melville, or Alonso.

I don't see Fla taking Martinez as he's projected to be a 3B. I see Skipworth or Melville here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know on SF. If there's an easier sign there for them that they rate close to the Boras guys, they may go for that player. I could see them taking Skipworth, Melville, or Alonso.

I don't see Fla taking Martinez as he's projected to be a 3B. I see Skipworth or Melville here.

Maybe Melville, but it's a little high for Skippy, no? I think Alonso is a good bet. I also think Melville's signing demands could scare them off.

I think Martinez will really help himself out this senior year. Come draft time, he will be behind only Hosmer and Beckham on my list (I'm projecting, off course). He will definitely swith to 3b, but he will be plus-defense there with a strong arm and great offensive tools. The only knock is lack of speed, which hardly matters for 3b. It's a little early, I don't disagree, but I see his stock rising over the next three months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Marlins drafted a 3B with their first pick last year, that's why I was thinking they'd stay away from Martinez. I'd love it if they took him as it would mean another good player dropping to the Nats.

I hadn't heard Melville as having big bonus demands. That would obviously cause him to drop combined with him being a HS pitcher.

So who do you have the O's and Nats taking? You seem to know what you're talking about:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • The problem with a Cowser/Kjerstad/Stowers/Bradfield outfield roster is there are no right handers to handle LHP. I don't think and completely left handed outfield is the destination for an organization the values versatility.
    • Looks maybe concussion related. 
    • How can you not be romantic about baseball? This seems slightly poetic. I enjoyed reading, and correlated your experience in the stands back to what I watch in Game 1 on MASN.  It was also pretty cool to hear Jim Palmer give you a shout out in Game 2 of the series on Live TV.
    • I am not worried.  It just doesn’t remotely meet the eye test.  He has been great in the field . I can think of at least 3 outstanding plays he has made and not any that I thought he should have gotten but didn’t. Meanwhile Holliday is 3 OAA and I can’t think of an outstanding play and can think of a number I thought he should have made. 
    • Nicely stated Roy. Every since I was 9 years old and saw the O's vs. the Tokyo Giants in Tokyo in 1971, I've been infected with the Orange/Black virus. There is no cure and I don't want one. You and I sat at the lunch table with Jim Palmer at the 1970 World Series Champs reunion, and its still one of my enduring baseball memories. You said I looked like Carlton Fisk! I was at all 3 games in this Angels series, right behind the O's dugout. I got to see all our boys, and just simply love to watch this team play. And in true baseball fashion, the one game on paper we should have dominated (GRod vs. 8+ ERA Channing), we end up down 7-0 and lose. But watching Gunnar's homers, his electric triple, and he made a fantastic play today on a ball that went under Westburg's glove, Adley do Adley things, Cowser, holy crap. Kimbrel v. Trout with bases loaded, bottom of 9th, 2 outs, down by 2? That was fun. Next game Trout bats leadoff and torches a GRod fastball for a homer to the opposite field.  An observation.... If you didn't know anything about the team, and you only watched game 1 batting practice, you'd think Cowser and O'Hearn were the studs of the team. Mountcastle was taking BP with the reserves and he put on a show as well.  Home after 3 straight days watching this O's team, so jealous of the Balt fans in Balt that get to see the team with regularity. It's a special bunch.
    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...