Jump to content

What does batting around mean?


BohKnowsBmore

What is "batting around?"  

111 members have voted

  1. 1. What is "batting around?"

    • Nine batters
      39
    • Ten or more batters
      72


Recommended Posts

This subject reminds me of the late Gino Cimoli, who set a dubious record while playing for the Orioles in 1964. In a game against the Senators, Gino was inserted into the game as a pinch-hitter and struck out. The Orioles batted around, and in his second AB of the inning, Cimoli struck out again, becoming the first major league player to strike out twice in the same inning as a pinch-hitter.

Gino's MLB career, which had started in 1956 and included playing in the 1960 WS for the Pirates, ended in May 1965, when he was released by the Angels. But he wasn't finished making records. In 1990, at the age of 60, he was honored by UPS for 21 years consecutive years of driving a delivery truck without an accident, which earned him the moniker, "The Lou Gehrig of UPS." Seriously. You can look it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Broadcast announcers proclaim the team has batted around when the 9th batter comes to plate in the inning. They announce the batters second appearance as such. One rotation concludes batting around. The ninth batter does not have to get on base to complete the cycle. A trip a trip around the world from Baltimore does not mean you have to land at an obscure airport east of Baltimore to complete the circumnavigation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me it's ten or more because "batting around" means that the guy that leadoff the inning, bats for a second time in the inning. I know Gary (or maybe it's Hunter) considers it to be when the 9th man in the lineup comes to bat in the inning...which I don't really agree with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why wouldnt 9? Once 9 have batted you're right back to the exact same spot in the order? #10 would be next man up, just like the inning started.

Yeah but if the 9th batter makes the third out and 10th batter doesn't bat, did you bat around?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Around has a circular reference. When you complete one circumference of a circle from a point on the circle back to the same point, you have gone "around" the circle. You do not have to pass the point. 9 is the answer

I don't see how that's correct. The 1st point and the 9th point, in the circle, aren't going to be the same point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Broadcast announcers proclaim the team has batted around when the 9th batter comes to plate in the inning. They announce the batters second appearance as such. One rotation concludes batting around. The ninth batter does not have to get on base to complete the cycle. A trip a trip around the world from Baltimore does not mean you have to land at an obscure airport east of Baltimore to complete the circumnavigation.

On this trip around the world, from Baltimore, would you end up back in Baltimore, after going around the world?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Broadcast announcers proclaim the team has batted around when the 9th batter comes to plate in the inning. They announce the batters second appearance as such.

It's not as though there is a "right" answer, but I disagree that most announcers mention "batting around," unless a batter comes up for the second time. I think that's the more common usage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess somebody has been ready WSJ.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/mlb-heres-a-perplexing-question-to-bat-around-1429571356

My opinion.

Ten or more.

Like many others have pointed out, you dont come back around until the guy bats a 2nd time in the inning.

Pretty much. Look at it this way: If you leave your house and take your dog for a walk around the neighborhood, have you walked around the neighborhood if you don't make it back to your house?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think of the "around" (circular reference, as a previous poster stated) like the face of a clock. Just imagine that there are nine numbers on the clock instead of 12. If you play "connect the dots" from 1 to 2 then from 2 to 3 and so on, you don't have a complete (closed) circle until you connect the final number to "1" again. So, "around" means one guy bats twice: it starts with him and ends no earlier than reaching him again. Short of that happening, theyre'd be a gap in the connect-the-dots circle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think of the "around" (circular reference, as a previous poster stated) like the face of a clock. Just imagine that there are nine numbers on the clock instead of 12. If you play "connect the dots" from 1 to 2 then from 2 to 3 and so on, you don't have a complete (closed) circle until you connect the final number to "1" again. So, "around" means one guy bats twice: it starts with him and ends no earlier than reaching him again. Short of that happening, theyre'd be a gap in the connect-the-dots circle.

No, if you start at 9, the circle is closed when you get back to 9. I believe you have batted around after the conclusion of the 9th AB. As soon as his AB is over, the circle is closed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, if you start at 9, the circle is closed when you get back to 9. I believe you have batted around after the conclusion of the 9th AB. As soon as his AB is over, the circle is closed.

You don't start with 9. You start with 1. Batter number 1. The first batter of the inning. If the inning ends with the 9th batter, then there's a gap from 9 to 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I don't think that there's any doubt that the team is probably more focused on deriving attendance-based revenue than just raw attendance.   They'd probably rather draw 2 mm fans at an average of $50/ticket than 2.2 mm fans at an average of $40 per ticket.  At the same time, you don't want to alienate loyal fans.  It's a tricky balance.   And as you say, the only time we see any gate revenue numbers is when Forbes published its annual numbers, and we don't even know where those come from or how accurate they are.  So, we discuss attendance because those numbers are published daily.   
    • In the spirit of the upcoming Boston series; David Ortiz said two things that are worth quoting in this tread: 1. "Baseball is a hard game to play; so no matter what uniform you wear, you have something in common with the guy in the other dugout: we all fail. The game is built that way." 2. "Listen, bro: If you can hit a baby doll head with a broomstick, you can hit an inside cutter. You don’t need a batting cage in the Dominican. You just have to love the game. And you need to be able to fight off your sister when she comes looking for her baby doll.”  IMHO this game lends itself to over analysis. It's a kid's game. It's just that in the MLB everyone is making huge amounts of money to play it. They all have to justify their salaries. But in the end, it's still just a kid's game.
    • And moving Cowser down to 7th is smart too. I like this lineup and will be interested to see if it will spark some offense.
    • Hi Puck- From a marketing standpoint the Orioles will eventually reach a relative saturation point which I agree is around 2.5m then it's about leveraging money from the fan experience-winning being a chief component of that.   
    • I doubt it.   wavetrapper joined about 10 days before OOO was banned.   He might have some similar views but seems better at claiming some unique expertise or superiority.   
    • Yes, it's possible.   But we don't know the extent to which the "old school" stuff is still taught.   I wouldn't assume it is ignored or underemphasized.   But, perhaps it is.   Nobody was asking that question last year or the first 2.5 months of this season, though.   I doubt the approach was any different when we were playing .650 ball than it is now.
    • Sports Guy- Isn't attendance becoming more of a  legacy statistic similar to Avg v. OPS?  It's a very different era than 1965 when there were few suites or "premium" seating and hardly any amenities beyond a beer and hot dog.  Today a seat and it's attachment rate are not comparable between say NY and KC-and we've seen the leverage of corporate sponsorship with TRP.  In the Warehouse I would think growing attachment rate and corporate partners would at some point have comparable priority as a revenue driver.  Seat sales account only ~20% of revenue and shrinking,  The revenue tilt is upgrading fans/corps. to a premium seat at an average of 4X the price.   Although this slide is from '22 it details the discrepancy between teams that can leverage premium seating and suites.  Playoff revenue is also likely in this slide which benefits teams like Houston. There is no real way I have found to judge revenue other than Forbes-just food for thought.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...