Jump to content

Markakis' Contract Renewed..Markakis annoyed


StunninSteve

Recommended Posts

I think we should sign him long term and reading between the lines, it seems like Nick would like that too.

But i guess the Orioles want to see more out of him...I don't agree with it but that is the way they want to handle it....many teams handle it the same way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply
"Pay dat man hees money."

The dude earned it, at least we could reward him now hoping that he will reward us later with a hometown discount. We should have offered him a million. In baseball, that is nothing, but it would have done a lot toward making Markakis happy.

The problem is that even though Markakis is worth a million, the problem becomes then next year when he is arbitration eligible, the price tag goes up substantially if he gets a million this year. Therefore the money starts adding up year after year. The best thing would be to sign him through all the arbitration years and buy out a few years of his free agency. That's how the good teams like Cleveland keep their young guys happy. The Orioles? Different story!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's getting to the point where if Nick has another solid year, or even progresses further in 2008, you need to reward him with a long term deal that acknowledges that contribution. I'm fine with the Orioles wanting to see if Nick continues to produce. But keeping him happy should definitely be in the back of their minds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SG, i don't think is is a bad thing to do if the O's want to see more of him. IMO

It could turn into a bad thing. another big year could be the difference between 6/42 mil. $ or 6/72 mil. $. If your not gonna take a risk on a guy like Markakis, then who will they take a risk on?

Heck, the Rockies gave Tulowiski a 6 year deal after one season. And Sizemore and now Holliday got longterm deals after only two full seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

also from the same article:

"The Philadelphia Phillies renewed the contract of Cole Hamels at $500,000, a result that the ace left-hander called a "low blow." Hamels went 15-5 with a 3.39 ERA last season and is viewed as one of the top young pitchers in the game."

but yeah, disappointing all the same, but i dont think, looking at those two, that he got a raw deal, at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure it does...It tells you that he wants a longer deal and is a little frustrated by not agreeing to something.

Exactly right. It's not wrong for the O's to want to see more. That said, when they do, and if they like what they see, they should reimburse Nick for carrying the risk this year rather than ponying up themselves.

You need to show, with the next contract, just how much you appreciate what a player offers. That said, they've got innumerable contracts left with him to make him feel better. The feelings here will fade soon enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure it does...It tells you that he wants a longer deal and is a little frustrated by not agreeing to something.

It tells nothing. Every player that gets put in this position says the same thing. Everyone is frustrated they do not have a longer deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It tells nothing. Every player that gets put in this position says the same thing. Everyone is frustrated they do not have a longer deal.

If it shows frustration it shows frustration. The universality of that emotion doesn't negate that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it shows frustration it shows frustration. The universality of that emotion doesn't negate that.

OK, well his stance isn't any different than his counterparts so I don't feel the reason to call that quote "very telling".

If he would have pulled a Cole Hamels or a Prince Fielder, that would be "very telling"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Had a couple of base hits up the middle last night, one of which was off a 98 MPH fastball, so maybe he's starting to get his timing down.  He's still not driving the ball too much yet, but that will come. I think he's close to a breakout game.
    • I know that you know this but probably don’t care. But the facts are 2019 was A LONG TIME AGO. And his initial injury was now 2 years ago. I’m not sure how relevant those 2019 numbers are to the ineffective pitcher that he is right now. We waited on him all season last year and that didn’t prove to be wise. If we get something from him that will probably be a great bonus. But I hope that there is now a plan A that doesn’t include waiting for a now off injury pitcher to turn back into the player that he was 5 years ago.
    • This thread is eerily similar to Cowser discussion last year… at some point, it may become needed  to reset and go back down .. Willie Mays and Mickey Mantle are famous examples  
    • You've been on quite the roll lately. The curmudgeony is starting to melt away! 🤣
    • I am guessing the extension only works when the player is rehabbing directly following recovery from surgery.   That was the case with Hernandez.  But in Means’ case, he pitched in four major league games, pretty effectively, after his 2023 rehab stint.  So I doubt this would count as a post-surgery rehab.  I guess we’ll find out.  
    • He would have had an RBI double last night if the ball didn't get "stuck" under the wall. Kjerstad would have easily scored. I didn't get to see the entire game, unfortunately.  I did get to see Kjerstad with some really superb swing decisions. He looks pretty locked in. It's a shame about the myocarditis, still blows my mind that he's 25. 
    • You had the same info we have now. You knew he missed the playoffs because of an injury.    You knew we had barely seen him since the TJ surgery.    And that was part of the point but you dismissed it.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...