Jump to content

Rey Navarro doesn't deserve to be sent down


Diehard_O's_Fan

Recommended Posts

Reality check time!

Nick Markakis - .292/.394/.326/ .720 so far

Travis Snider - .281/.369/.404/ .773 so far.

There is nothing here that shows Snider is not adequate enough to replace Nick. Even if you include defense Snider is at 0.0 dWAR and Nick is at -0.5.

Did I mention Snider is making like 1/5 of his salary too?

Big win for Duquette so far on this exchange, and I think it'll only get better as the season goes on.

I've watched a few Braves games, and it looks like Nick has lost another step (since last season) in the OF. He ain't what he used to be in the field. Hopefully, he'll hit with more pop as the season progresses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

What is flaherty's future in the organization? Honest question. Is he forever a util or do they think he can man a specific position with average to above average offense?

As for Rey, he hasn't done the little things well enough to stay up for the player he is. He needs to get down the bunt and play mistake free defense which he has not done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've watched a few Braves games, and it looks like Nick has lost another step (since last season) in the OF. He ain't what he used to be in the field. Hopefully, he'll hit with more pop as the season progresses.

Maybe he is still hampered by the...wait for it...NECK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if others here are aware of just how bad Cabrera is struggling (I didn't know until I just checked) but he is currently OPSing a robust .481 through 21 games. I would think that has to make him quite vulnerable when Hardy / Flaherty are ready. The question is does his 'veteranosity' trump his poor performance? Unfortunately I think it probably does.

Or maybe Buck and company don't put a whole lot of weight on 21 games and less than 80 PAs, and instead they favor the player who they project to be better going forward. I wouldn't automatically assume bias - I'd guess Buck puts some weight on the fact that Cabrera has had a 3+ win season in the major leagues a couple years ago while Navarro was playing decently for a AA team. I would assume that the reason Cabrera made the team out of spring training while Navarro was sent to Norfolk was that about one month ago the Orioles analyzed the situation and determined that Cabrera was better, and one month won't change that opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or maybe Buck and company don't put a whole lot of weight on 21 games and less than 80 PAs, and instead they favor the player who they project to be better going forward. I wouldn't automatically assume bias - I'd guess Buck puts some weight on the fact that Cabrera has had a 3+ win season in the major leagues a couple years ago while Navarro was playing decently for a AA team. I would assume that the reason Cabrera made the team out of spring training while Navarro was sent to Norfolk was that about one month ago the Orioles analyzed the situation and determined that Cabrera was better, and one month won't change that opinion.
Except it's not a choice between Navarro and Cabrera, it's between Cabrera and Lough.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or maybe Buck and company don't put a whole lot of weight on 21 games and less than 80 PAs, and instead they favor the player who they project to be better going forward. I wouldn't automatically assume bias - I'd guess Buck puts some weight on the fact that Cabrera has had a 3+ win season in the major leagues a couple years ago while Navarro was playing decently for a AA team. I would assume that the reason Cabrera made the team out of spring training while Navarro was sent to Norfolk was that about one month ago the Orioles analyzed the situation and determined that Cabrera was better, and one month won't change that opinion.

Yeah but Cabrera was on PED's. So not a fair linear comparison to Navarro being in AA-AAA. Just from my eye test it looks like Navarro has more pop in his bat that Cabrera. Cabrera not knocking those two balls down in the last week really and having a .456 OPS are really all I need to see from him. But given the way the roster is this is a moot point because both will be optioned for Hardy and Flaherty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah but Cabrera was on PED's. So not a fair linear comparison to Navarro being in AA-AAA. Just from my eye test it looks like Navarro has more pop in his bat that Cabrera. Cabrera not knocking those two balls down in the last week really and having a .456 OPS are really all I need to see from him. But given the way the roster is this is a moot point because both will be optioned for Hardy and Flaherty.

What makes you think Navarro has earned anything? He's getting paid. That's what he has earned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah but Cabrera was on PED's. So not a fair linear comparison to Navarro being in AA-AAA. Just from my eye test it looks like Navarro has more pop in his bat that Cabrera. Cabrera not knocking those two balls down in the last week really and having a .456 OPS are really all I need to see from him. But given the way the roster is this is a moot point because both will be optioned for Hardy and Flaherty.

Nelson Cruz was on PEDs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah but Cabrera was on PED's. So not a fair linear comparison to Navarro being in AA-AAA. Just from my eye test it looks like Navarro has more pop in his bat that Cabrera. Cabrera not knocking those two balls down in the last week really and having a .456 OPS are really all I need to see from him. But given the way the roster is this is a moot point because both will be optioned for Hardy and Flaherty.

Chris Davis was on PEDs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chris Davis was on PEDs.

Yeah and they are still performing and testing positive. Cabrera has stunk without them. The PED thing doesn't bother me at all. The whole league was on them. Cabrera is just not good. I don't wanna derail the topic. My point is right now that Navarro is more valuable player now and in the future. The idea of Cabrera sounded good. But you can't steal first or help the club when you're striking out all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah and they are still performing and testing positive. Cabrera has stunk without them. The PED thing doesn't bother me at all. The whole league was on them. Cabrera is just not good. I don't wanna derail the topic. My point is right now that Navarro is more valuable player now and in the future. The idea of Cabrera sounded good. But you can't steal first or help the club when you're striking out all the time.

I'm no fan of Cabrera's, but he still has not struck out as much as De Aza who's usually in the lead off spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm no fan of Cabrera's, but he still has not struck out as much as De Aza who's usually in the lead off spot.

They both should be nowhere near the leadoff spot this season. Cabrera's -0.8 WAR is the 5th worst in baseball. We really need Pearce to find his 2014 form.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Nicely stated Roy. Every since I was 9 years old and saw the O's vs. the Tokyo Giants in Tokyo in 1971, I've been infected with the Orange/Black virus. There is no cure and I don't want one. You and I sat at the lunch table with Jim Palmer at the 1970 World Series Champs reunion, and its still one of my enduring baseball memories. You said I looked like Carlton Fisk! I was at all 3 games in this Angels series, right behind the O's dugout. I got to see all our boys, and just simply love to watch this team play. And in true baseball fashion, the one game on paper we should have dominated (GRod vs. 8+ ERA Channing), we end up down 7-0 and lose. But watching Gunnar's homers, his electric triple, and he made a fantastic play today on a ball that went under Westburg's glove, Adley do Adley things, Cowser, holy crap. Kimbrel v. Trout with bases loaded, bottom of 9th, 2 outs, down by 2? That was fun. Next game Trout bats leadoff and torches a GRod fastball for a homer to the opposite field.  An observation.... If you didn't know anything about the team, and you only watched game 1 batting practice, you'd think Cowser and O'Hearn were the studs of the team. Mountcastle was taking BP with the reserves and he put on a show as well.  Home after 3 straight days watching this O's team, so jealous of the Balt fans in Balt that get to see the team with regularity. It's a special bunch.
    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...