Jump to content

Proof of how much the offense misses Cruz and Markakis


mdbdotcom

Recommended Posts

The table below compares regular season stats for all of 2014 with 32 games played thus far in 2015 and the projected numbers based on those 32 games.

Obviously, these numbers will change (maybe we should update this each month), but this is where things stand now.

	R	H	BB	2B	3B	HR	TB	RBI	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS2014	705	1434	401	264	16	211	2363	681	0.256	0.311	0.422	0.73432 GP	151	285	81	53	6	42	476	145	0.266	0.324	0.444	0.768Proj.	764	1443	410	268	30	213	2410	734	0.266	0.324	0.444	0.768
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

So -- that's proof of how much we don't miss them, right?

I'm pretty tired of this subject, to be honest. I've already concluded that starting pitching is going to decide our season, even though we didn't lose a single starting pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jimmy has picked up the slack on this years offense (and Adam of course). If Pearce could get close to what he was last year we will have a dominant offense. As Frobby said though, starting pitching is going to dictate our season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So -- that's proof of how much we don't miss them, right?

I'm pretty tired of this subject, to be honest. I've already concluded that starting pitching is going to decide our season, even though we didn't lose a single starting pitcher.

Why, yes, I guess the numbers do show that. Oh my!

I agree with your point about starting pitching and I'm tired of this argument as well. That's whey I posted data that shows we don't miss them at all and their departures have had nothing to do with the team's troubles to date..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always thought that we should have re-signed Cruz. Just my opinion.

He's gone and that's all I plan to comment on this.

You do realize the numbers shown indicate the offense is better and they don't miss him at all right? You read that correctly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One could always make the claim that we'd be scoring even more. Who knows if Paredes even makes the team or gets a chance to play with Cruz here. BUT, if you take the best of all worlds having Cruz would certainly have made us better. Davis was a presence in the middle in 2013. Cruz in 2014. As nice a start as Jones and Paredes have gotten off to, we don't have quite the presence in the middle of the lineup this year. Maybe Davis gets it going.

What's tiresome is that everyone acknowledges that we'd be better wtih Cruz and Miller. Pretty easy to harp on it at this point. Let's see how it looks in year 2-3-4 or even later this summer. We still aren't a championship team with those guys with the current state of the starting rotation.

Davis is hitting 50 points better than last year and OPSing .821, about the same as his 2012 quasi-breakout year. He strikes out a lot but overall his production is just fine, and the plan to "replace" Cruz with increased production from CD and Manny is working out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the point that Paredes and Machado have helped make up for the loss of Cruz. Not to be mean, but it doesn't take much to replace Markaki's offense from the last two years.

Young and Snider are more than replacing Nick's offensive production from last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Need to clean up the defense a little and play better fundamentals. All about the pitching. Ubaldo and Tillman seemed to have reversed their roles this year. Gonzo and Chen seem like they will be solid. Norris will be the wildcard. He can be replaced.

The year Ubaldo almost won the Cy Young:

Through his first 12 starts, Jimenez had a microscopic 0.78 ERA, and the number didn't peek above 2.00 until his 17th outing. He was 15-1 at the All-Star break and was the first pitcher since the Braves' Greg Maddux in 1988 to have as many wins at the break.

In the second half, however, he was 4-7 with a 3.80 ERA.

n many of those starts, it was hard to fault Jimenez. Five times during the season, including three times after he tied the franchise wins record with his 17th on Aug. 4, the Rockies didn't score a single run with him on the mound. The Rockies' 6-5 victory over the Brewers at Coors Field on Aug. 15 should have gone under Jimenez's win column, but the normally dependable Clint Barmes misjudged an eighth-inning popup to allow Milwaukee to tie the game, and Colorado won it in the ninth.

http://m.rockies.mlb.com/news/article/16111966/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Good point, no other metropolitan area has more than one team.
    • Could it be that they allowed the Gnats to reside within 30 minutes of their home. Effectively cutting their market in half? 
    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...