Jump to content

Proof of how much the offense misses Cruz and Markakis


mdbdotcom

Recommended Posts

That word, "stylish", seems to get used a lot to describe Nick in the last year on this board. I am not sure what it implies...Nick was more concerned about how he looked than catching the ball? His speed diminished from his early years, but I believe he made plays look "stylish" or easy because he was almost always in the right place. Unlike the ..umm...adventurous play of our current platoon. And DeAza's play was a mental mistake, not a physical one. The fact that we got out of it is completely and totally irrelevant. A Felix Pie kind of mistake. One likely to be repeated in the future because it demonstrates a misfiring of baseball "thinking" at key moments.

I think Nick was very "Athletic" as opposed to "stylish.

He always appeared to have good body control. He was never awkward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply
This memory of Nick being perfect is intriguing. If you think Nick never got a bad break on a ball, God bless you. He was very sure handed and was fundamentally very sound. I'll agree with you there. He caught what he got to.

Didn't say perfect. Far from it. I was far more critical of Nick than many. But there were very few instances where Nick made the mistake DeAza made. It was a Felix Pie mistake. I hope I am wrong but I think the current platoon has already made and will continue to make mental and physical errors in right that Nick did not make. But I still would not have resigned him.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am conviced that you do not realize the lack of range from our former right-fielder. He is very graceful, smart and athletic. But terribly slow.

Yeah I totally agree as that running catch Delmon made in the gap the other night that Buck said was the play of the game - no way Markakis makes that catch as he wouldn't be fast enough to get a glove on it. I was watching a game which Atlanta lost by a run when the Nationals catcher hit a high fly ball to rf and any right fielder with average speed would have caught and Markakis was playing towards the gap and looked like he was running in sand and was a step short of catching it and that ended up winning losing the game. So while he catches everything he gets to he isn't getting to as many fly balls as a good outfielder should as he is really really s l o w!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That word, "stylish", seems to get used a lot to describe Nick in the last year on this board. I am not sure what it implies...Nick was more concerned about how he looked than catching the ball? His speed diminished from his early years, but I believe he made plays look "stylish" or easy because he was almost always in the right place. Unlike the ..umm...adventurous play of our current platoon. And DeAza's play was a mental mistake, not a physical one. The fact that we got out of it is completely and totally irrelevant. A Felix Pie kind of mistake. One likely to be repeated in the future because it demonstrates a misfiring of baseball "thinking" at key moments.

Interesting you compare DeAza and Pie. I was just thinking the other night how much DeAza resembled Felix with the bonehead plays and overall game!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree. The numbers don't back that up and our outfield defense minus a game or two hasn't been the problem this year. As many people have said already, our starting pitching, particularly Tillman and Norris have been the problem. You can't win consistently when 2/5s af your starting rotation have been pretty awful.

Their track records suggest they'll get better, and for the all the Orioles problems this year they are just four games back and no team in tha AL East looks dominant. It's not fun being under .500 at this time of the year, but I think the Orioles are positioned pretty well to be in the mix at the end of the year.

Tillman and Norris's lines (Tillman in particular) would look far better were it not for some ill-timed defensive miscues in the outfield. So those go somewhat hand-in-hand I would think.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tillman and Norris's lines (Tillman in particular) would look far better were it not for some ill-timed defensive miscues in the outfield. So those go somewhat hand-in-hand I would think.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You are right about a couple runs for Tillman. Of course the reason it was ruled a hit was that with normal effort, that ball is not off the glove, it is over the fielder's head. It is still my belief that Nick never gets to it. Drop step or not. Nick always broke well, but he really have very limited range. Which right field in Baltimore camouflaged well. At this point we need to be looking at Tillman and getting him right. It is not the outfield I fear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Six weeks. Last year Cruz was hitting similarly, if not quite as well, then hit .200 for three months. We'll see how the rest of the year goes. And the next. And the next. And the next.

Chris Davis out hit him for those three months. The first and last sure were super though. SUPER.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't say perfect. Far from it. I was far more critical of Nick than many. But there were very few instances where Nick made the mistake DeAza made. It was a Felix Pie mistake. I hope I am wrong but I think the current platoon has already made and will continue to make mental and physical errors in right that Nick did not make. But I still would not have resigned him.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

DeAza made a mistake, sure. But in many cases where DeAza would easily get to the ball for an our, Markakis wouldn't come close and allow an extra baserunner to get on.

It all balances out in the end... both mental mistakes and physical limitations are part of defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the blue jays have a great offense and aren't doing so hot either. Pitching wins.

Playing good baseball wins. Pitching only takes you so far. The 1972 Orioles allowed 430 runs all season (let that sink in for a minute - I'm pretty sure the '96 Orioles had allowed 430 runs by late June). And they finished with the 11th-best record in baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not every thing that goes wrong isn't because of clubhouse chemistry or lack thereof, but it's really damn hard to win without it. I honestly can't think of a team that didn't get along/was dysfunctional that won it all in any sport.

Look at the '04 Lakers. They were the best team in the league, but they hated each other and eventually imploded in the finals (against a Pistons team that played together and was extremely close).

How did a team that hated each other make it all the way to the finals?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yeah, basically this, that Westburg's underlying numbers (EV, barrel %, xwOBA) seem to point at this being pretty real, or at least that there's nothing 'undeserved / lucky' about this hot streak, if it's just that. 
    • The problem with a Cowser/Kjerstad/Stowers/Bradfield outfield roster is there are no right handers to handle LHP. I don't think and completely left handed outfield is the destination for an organization the values versatility.
    • Looks maybe concussion related. 
    • How can you not be romantic about baseball? This seems slightly poetic. I enjoyed reading, and correlated your experience in the stands back to what I watch in Game 1 on MASN.  It was also pretty cool to hear Jim Palmer give you a shout out in Game 2 of the series on Live TV.
    • I am not worried.  It just doesn’t remotely meet the eye test.  He has been great in the field . I can think of at least 3 outstanding plays he has made and not any that I thought he should have gotten but didn’t. Meanwhile Holliday is 3 OAA and I can’t think of an outstanding play and can think of a number I thought he should have made. 
    • Nicely stated Roy. Every since I was 9 years old and saw the O's vs. the Tokyo Giants in Tokyo in 1971, I've been infected with the Orange/Black virus. There is no cure and I don't want one. You and I sat at the lunch table with Jim Palmer at the 1970 World Series Champs reunion, and its still one of my enduring baseball memories. You said I looked like Carlton Fisk! I was at all 3 games in this Angels series, right behind the O's dugout. I got to see all our boys, and just simply love to watch this team play. And in true baseball fashion, the one game on paper we should have dominated (GRod vs. 8+ ERA Channing), we end up down 7-0 and lose. But watching Gunnar's homers, his electric triple, and he made a fantastic play today on a ball that went under Westburg's glove, Adley do Adley things, Cowser, holy crap. Kimbrel v. Trout with bases loaded, bottom of 9th, 2 outs, down by 2? That was fun. Next game Trout bats leadoff and torches a GRod fastball for a homer to the opposite field.  An observation.... If you didn't know anything about the team, and you only watched game 1 batting practice, you'd think Cowser and O'Hearn were the studs of the team. Mountcastle was taking BP with the reserves and he put on a show as well.  Home after 3 straight days watching this O's team, so jealous of the Balt fans in Balt that get to see the team with regularity. It's a special bunch.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...