Jump to content

Fangraphs: Adam Jones Is Up To Something


weams

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I noticed something about Adam Jones. Machado, as noted, is showing some weird changes in his plate discipline. Jones is, too, in a different way.

This is nothing new to some of you, but I suppose some of you aren’t all of you. Jones, this year, is still swinging aggressively. He’s still hitting the ball harder than average. He’s still not drawing walks, but he’s still on pace to hit 25 or 30 dingers. Jones, in almost all areas, looks like himself. But all of a sudden, there’s contact. Jones is avoiding whiffs like he hasn't avoided whiffs.

He doesn't whiff!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His strikeout % has been pretty darn consistent from 2009-2014. It stayed between 18-19.7% of his PA.

So far in 2015 he has cut that down to 11.6%, which seems like a huge reduction, and no i have no idea if it's sustainable or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loved this article.

Less excited about the Pearce news:

http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/batted-ball-distance-decliners-3/

Read the two articles. All of the climbers are NL west and a few NL central players. All of the decliners are AL or NL east. There is some factor besides just natural regression or advancement driving these numbers.

As for Adam, got to think Coolbaugh found a hitch or produced a more efficient swing for Adam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of the decliners are AL or NL east.

Dexter Fowler is the biggest decliner, and...a Cub. Second is a Ray. Third a cardinal. 4th a Tiger. 5th a Royal. 6th, a Padre.

Color me confused by your comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You?ll notice the consistency. Only one of the seasons shown is partial. In all the other ones, Jones batted more than 500 times, and his strikeout rate fluctuated between 18 ? 21% while his contact rate fluctuated between 74 ? 78%.

Let's wait at least until the All Star break before saying his K and contact rates will be representative.

You see a lot of activity around 75% or so. A few peaks jut above 80%. But this current run? By this measure, at least, it?s a career high for Adam Jones. He?s never before had a 35-game contact rate of 84%. Last year he briefly reached 81%. He got up there as well in the middle of 2012. It?s actually an interesting graph ? beyond Jones setting a new high, it seems like there?s been more dramatic volatility the last few years of Jones? career. I don?t know why that would be. I know that baseball is a game of constant adjustments on both sides, but that seems over-simplified.

OK so he's set a new high over 35 games. Cool! Again that's 35 games and he says right here Jones' rates have been volatile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a really good article. I posted this in the comments:

I agree, this pattern is repeating, the contact rate graph shows it. This iteration is more extreme then the previous, but that also looks like the start of a pattern.

In my opinion (and i watch Jones play quite a bit) he is learning how to maximize the hot streak and minimize the slump. This is someting Jones has been doing for several years and it continues to pay dividends.

What throws chaos in the numbers is the amount of time he played through injuries which really put him in some slumps. He stays healthy this year and I predict its his best.

Here is the contact rate chart from the article:

adam-jones-rolling-contact-rate-2.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

I posted this last month (April 25th) in the 7th inning of a game against the Red Sox:

o

Earlier in the game, Jones punched a single the opposite way on a very similar pitch.

That time he poked it to the opposite way again, but it was a flyout.

I like the fact that he is getting a piece of outside pitches, and going the other way with them.

A bunch of opposite-field hits and opposite-field flyouts are a lot better than strikeouts.

http://forum.orioleshangout.com/forums/showthread.php/147610-vs-RED-SOX-4-25/page24

Later in that same game, Jones again went the opposite way on an outside pitch and hit a lead-off triple in the bottom of the 10th inning, sparking the Orioles' come-from behind win, which culminated in David Lough's walk-off home run.

I would love to see Jones continuing to do this ...... it won't result in many home runs, but if he cannot completely lay off of the outside pitches, I would at least like to see him get a piece of the ball, which would give him a chance to get on base with an opposite-field hit, and/or get a sacrifice-fly with a medium-range fly ball with a runner on 3rd base and less than two outs ....... both of which are considerably better outcomes than is a strikeout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
    • I agree I missed the mark on a correct forum, and ask a moderator to please relocate to Rants as that game annoyed me yesterday. I appreciate the strong moderators here and know I'm not one of them.     Sorry for making it worse at a tough moment.    I won't bump it again, even ironically if we kick their butts in the playoffs.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...