Jump to content

The Bos stickin it to Peter again.


fansince71

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 154
  • Created
  • Last Reply

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/19/AR2007031901643.html

"It's another Angelos story to add to the list, says a GM. He effects everything they do. They may never overcome him. Why would they want a first basemen when they can overpay for middle relievers and have 4 DH's?"

Most GM's and Boswell agree with me. You trade a good 2b for a 40 HR first baseman who's only 27 and can protect Tejada for years.

Edit:damn Fansince! You beat me to it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's just another Angelos story to add to the list," one baseball executive said. "He affects everything they do. They may never overcome him. Why would they want a first baseman when they can overpay for middle relievers and have four DHs?"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/19/AR2007031901643_2.html

It's hard to argue with Boswell, but he's just so annoying.

We get it, slappy, but guess what? You've got your own jacked up franchise to b*tch about down there, so shhhhhhhhhhhhh...

:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's hard to argue with Boswell, but he's just so annoying.

We get it, slappy, but guess what? You've got your own jacked up franchise to b*tch about down there, so shhhhhhhhhhhhh...

:rolleyes:

He won't be *****ing about them for long. With Kasten running it and a new stadium on the way. They will leave us in the dust.:(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He won't be *****ing about them for long. With Kasten running it and a new stadium on the way. They will leave us in the dust.:(

Yeeeeeeah no. That's inferiority complex. The Nats have one of the worst farm systems. They have an awful team. They only have one (injury prone) starter and a bunch of Trachsel-level scrubs fighting for four spots. The only sign of future talent comes in Ryan Zimmerman. They have ONE prospect on BA's top 100, and he's at 95.

It'll be years before they compete. Well, maybe not before they compete, but before they're a decent team that is worthy of competing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...if he is talking about anything OTHER then the Orioles.

Thats a pretty silly statement. He's an excellent writer no matter what the subject. Maybe he doesnt know everything about the Orioles but i think he has a good understanding about IDIOT owners - PollinSnyderAngelos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats a pretty silly statement. He's an excellent writer no matter what the subject. Maybe he doesnt know everything about the Orioles but i think he has a good understanding about IDIOT owners - PollinSnyderAngelos.

How is it silly?

It's like some people on here: they make some good points, but when it is wrapped in a veil of, "ANGELOSSUXANGELOSSUXANGELOSSUXANGELOSSUX!!!11," anything worth reading is lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boswell is right. This is exactly the same stuff we've always heard, always feared and always complained about. Angelos openly admits to vetoing moves his GMs thought would "improve the team". Until he's gone we won't be in the position to compete again. Don't ignore the message just because you don't like the messenger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • The problem with a Cowser/Kjerstad/Stowers/Bradfield outfield roster is there are no right handers to handle LHP. I don't think and completely left handed outfield is the destination for an organization the values versatility.
    • Looks maybe concussion related. 
    • How can you not be romantic about baseball? This seems slightly poetic. I enjoyed reading, and correlated your experience in the stands back to what I watch in Game 1 on MASN.  It was also pretty cool to hear Jim Palmer give you a shout out in Game 2 of the series on Live TV.
    • I am not worried.  It just doesn’t remotely meet the eye test.  He has been great in the field . I can think of at least 3 outstanding plays he has made and not any that I thought he should have gotten but didn’t. Meanwhile Holliday is 3 OAA and I can’t think of an outstanding play and can think of a number I thought he should have made. 
    • Nicely stated Roy. Every since I was 9 years old and saw the O's vs. the Tokyo Giants in Tokyo in 1971, I've been infected with the Orange/Black virus. There is no cure and I don't want one. You and I sat at the lunch table with Jim Palmer at the 1970 World Series Champs reunion, and its still one of my enduring baseball memories. You said I looked like Carlton Fisk! I was at all 3 games in this Angels series, right behind the O's dugout. I got to see all our boys, and just simply love to watch this team play. And in true baseball fashion, the one game on paper we should have dominated (GRod vs. 8+ ERA Channing), we end up down 7-0 and lose. But watching Gunnar's homers, his electric triple, and he made a fantastic play today on a ball that went under Westburg's glove, Adley do Adley things, Cowser, holy crap. Kimbrel v. Trout with bases loaded, bottom of 9th, 2 outs, down by 2? That was fun. Next game Trout bats leadoff and torches a GRod fastball for a homer to the opposite field.  An observation.... If you didn't know anything about the team, and you only watched game 1 batting practice, you'd think Cowser and O'Hearn were the studs of the team. Mountcastle was taking BP with the reserves and he put on a show as well.  Home after 3 straight days watching this O's team, so jealous of the Balt fans in Balt that get to see the team with regularity. It's a special bunch.
    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...