Jump to content

Stark:Roberts deal could be done next week


goodol23

Recommended Posts

Ok...If they want to realistically compete by reducing the amount of question marks about their team.

I don't consider DeRosa a question mark.

The Cubs' question marks are at CF, SS, C, back of the rotation. This addresses none of these.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 193
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I don't consider DeRosa a question mark.

The question marks are in CF, SS, C, back of the rotation.

Your leadoff spot and speed in the lineup is a question mark. And the upgrade of Roberts over Derosa lessens the impact of the question marks at CF, SS and C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems to be there under "Cubs make an offer for Roberts." on the Rumor Central page. The Rumor Central heading changed on the MLB page just because they had some Yankee news... :rolleyes:

The Yankees signed Billy Crystal to a 10/200 million $ contract, then he tested positive for steroids?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't consider DeRosa a question mark.

I don't think he's a question mark either. I think he's reliably-OK. If I was counting up guys I was happy with, I wouldn't count him. He's OK, but I'm not especially happy if he's my 2B. That doesn't mean I hate the guy or anything. It's just that, if I'm Hendry, then 2B is a place where I'm not especially happy. On the other hand, BRob would make me happy at 2B.

The Cubs' question marks are at CF, SS, C, back of the rotation.

So, to review:

  • 15 key players, minus CF, SS, and C = a 12-Player team.
  • Minus 2B where Hendry is not happy = an 11-Player Team.
  • Let's say 1 of CF, SS and C comes through and makes you happy. That's a 12-Player Team.
  • BRob turns a maybe-12-Player Team into a 13-Player Team. (Plus, DeRosa gives you a Super Bench Guy plus a Super Spare Part for when something goes wrong.)

That's the diff between maybe-playoffs and as good a shot at getting to the WS as anybody. Which is why the Cubs won't let it go. They want the guy, and with good reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a complete fallacy.

Postseason baseball is a crapshoot, and the best team rarely wins. Go look and see. Heck I bet since the postseason expanded to 8, more wildcard teams (2 per year) have won the WS than Division Champs (6 per year). If not it's darn close.

If you want to try and connect the dots between roster makeup and playoff odds, you'd look at starting pitching first. And second. And third too. Nobody wins on the strength of a middle infielder.

I think last year's post-season failure is, in fact, the driving force behind the Cubs strong interest in Roberts. Piniella and Hendry want a proven offensive catalyst. Roberts may well have made a difference in that series with San Diego. So, yes, I think the Cubs do have the post-season in mind when considering a trade for Roberts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think last year's post-season failure is, in fact, the driving force behind the Cubs strong interest in Roberts. Piniella and Hendry want a proven offensive catalyst. Roberts may well have made a difference in that series with San Diego. So, yes, I think the Cubs do have the post-season in mind when considering a trade for Roberts.
I totally agree with you on that. The Cubs are looking for a legit leadoff hitter and Roberts fits that like a glove.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brian needs an O WS ring:)

Why do I care if the Cubs go to the WS?:002_smad:[/quote

:rolleyes: I understand people love certain players but what is with this fascination? I have been looking for a substantiated reason for all of the puppy love between you and him but I just cant find it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well that's part of what i'm saying too, as far as competing for a world series.

NL Central is better then people think, I think. Cubs may realistically not even make it to he playoffs with or without Roberts.

HAHAHA!,What? with a lineup of BROb,FuKu,Sori,D.LEE,ARam,TheRiot,SoTo ,Pie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • As in, another instance and you'd want him gone? Elias and the FO are building a foundation that will enable them to be a team I haven't witnessed in my lifetime - a consistent competitive team. I have 100% confidence in the process of the FO. Will every decision pan out? Of course not. But has the FO helped the organization more than any other FO in my lifetime? Without a doubt. My much greater concern is that Elias, Sig, et al leave because another organization realizes how valuable they are.
    • Opening Day Is a 3:05 gane start at Csmden Yards.They  are going to open the gates three hours before the game?  Have not heard this but you may be right. Fenway which usually does an 11/2 gate opening ,is doing a 2 hour gate opening for Opening Day. 
    • Don't see a final roster posted yet.  If so, I missed it.
    • On balance I think it's fair to expect the improved rotation and regressed bullpen will even out, so pitching overall for the team will remain about the same. Meanwhile the hitting should definitely improve!
    • At 76.5 I'll take the over on the O's and pass on betting their place in the standings.  While I'm pretty upset with this past off season, I'm not quite ready to grab a pitchfork.  Given that Westburg and Cowser and several others could all be ready to contribute soon, Elias should have a fair amount of flexibility at the trade deadline.  Was that his strategy all along?  Beats the heck out of me, but if that's the case and we sit and watch another failure to launch (liftoff v2.0 anyone?) then most of the goodwill I have toward him evaporates overnight.  Bottom line?  The 2022 O's earned a bigger investment than they've received so far but it's not too late to fix it.
    • MLB and the newly-unionized minor leagues just struck a new CBA.  Doubles AAA salaries with even bigger raises for the lower minors.  Now minor leaguers *almost* make a liveable wage.
    • I won't lie, I'm very concerned about not having Tate in the bullpen for a month or 2. Tate was our most reliable reliever. Hyde could always count on him to get the job done. I thought Givens could fill the gap, but now Givens is injured too. Someone is going to have to seriously step up for the bullpen. I'm also convinced that Tyler Wells has a limited number of innings he can be effective. We've seen what happened last year once he got beyond a certain threshold. (He got injured.) I think that after a couple months, we might see either Voth, Baumann, Hall, or Rodriguez take some starts in that rotation spot. Who it is, depends on how Rodriguez and Hall are doing in Norfolk. If one of them is dominating, that's who will get the call.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...