Jump to content

Stark:Roberts deal could be done next week


goodol23

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 193
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Hes overrated and not much of a upgrade for them. This writer is off base and hated.....:cool:

haha. him and cedeno are the same player at the same age. i would only do cedeno, gall, and maybe one other prospect for him. he is not even as good as derosa. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The hype is a little thick here wouldn't you say?

Get him, and they finally have a classic leadoff hitter who can steal 60 bases, approach a .400 on-base percentage, hit for some power and flash leather. Get him, and they have Jerome Walton in 1989 and Bob Dernier in 1984, both magical seasons. Get him, and they're good enough to challenge the Mets and Diamondbacks and dream about playing the Yankees or Red Sox or Tigers in October.

Don't get him? Well, Ryan Theriot is your leadoff hitter, Mark DeRosa is your second baseman. And serviceable as both players are, not to mention popular, 100 years without a World Series title probably becomes 101.

I hope Jimmy Hendry feels this way. If so, we'd have a lot more coming than we've been offered to date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a small update to the Brian Roberts saga. Timmy was on Mike & Mike on ESPN radio this morning. We learned that he is really hairy. He also made a comment about the Cubs. I can't remember what the exact quote was now at this point. I believe it was something along the lines of "I don't know if it gets done" in reference to Roberts to the cubs. Kind of contrary to what everyone else is saying that it's going to get done soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The most interesting thing in the article to me is:

"We want to keep Soriano nice and healthy and strong all year,'' Piniella said. ``It seems to me, out of the leadoff spot, he'll want to do too much, run too soon. Out of the two hole, it might be easier for him not to have to run as much. My point is, it's for his own good. And for the team's good, because having him in that lineup is important to us."

This is actually a quote from Lou. He wants to save Soriano's leg. If that is true then Roberts as a leadoff hitter might be what Lou does wants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How has Jay Mariotti kept his job for so long and gained so much notoriety? He is such a blatantly pathetic excuse for a journalist. I have never read a column of his that didn't have some kind of factual error in it that a reasonably intelligent and responsible high school journalism 101 student would have corrected.

He didn't comment immediately, which triggered memories of his flat denial in 2006 when Jason Grimsley told federal agents that Roberts once used. But he did come clean five days after the Mitchell Report.

Yup, professional, paid journalists continue to cite a fabricated story that has been proven to be completely false. On top of that he's wrong on the details of the discredited report he's citing. The state of the media in this nation is truly a disgrace. There are good journalists out there, but it seems the public often prefers to read the work of complete and total hacks with chips on their shoulders who are much more interested in advancing some sort of agenda than reporting the news or advancing intelligent discourse.

Jay Mariotti makin me mad!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How has Jay Mariotti kept his job for so long and gained so much notoriety? He is such a blatantly pathetic excuse for a journalist. I have never read a column of his that didn't have some kind of factual error in it that a reasonably intelligent and responsible high school journalism 101 student would have corrected.

Yup, professional, paid journalists continue to cite a fabricated story that has been proven to be completely false. On top of that he's wrong on the details of the discredited report he's citing. The state of the media in this nation is truly a disgrace. There are good journalists out there, but it seems the public often prefers to read the work of complete and total hacks with chips on their shoulders who are much more interested in advancing some sort of agenda than reporting the news or advancing intelligent discourse.

Jay Mariotti makin me mad!

I don't mean to get in the way of another BBA picking of nits and mole hill mountains, but correct me if I'm wrong...wouldn't it be the editors job to catch factual errors before it goes to print?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mean to get in the way of another BBA picking of nits and mole hill mountains, but correct me if I'm wrong...wouldn't it be the editors job to catch factual errors before it goes to print?

It's the editor's job to fact check every article in a daily newspaper? I don't think so. I *think* that most of the fact checking is left up to the "journalist." Editors determine placement, length of content, some headlines, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mean to get in the way of another BBA picking of nits and mole hill mountains, but correct me if I'm wrong...wouldn't it be the editors job to catch factual errors before it goes to print?

I highly, highly doubt it was an unintentional mistake. Mariotti has been know to lie in his column with regularity whenever it suits his agenda and it's not really plausible to think that a baseball columnist and steroid crusader failed to hear the widely reported fact that the Grimsley affidavit was unsealed and the names in it were not the ones reported by the LA Times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I highly, highly doubt it was an unintentional mistake. Mariotti has been know to lie in his column with regularity whenever it suits his agenda and it's not really plausible to think that a baseball columnist and steroid crusader failed to hear the widely reported fact that the Grimsley affidavit was unsealed and the names in it were not the ones reported by the LA Times.

Alright, explain the agenda/conspiracy for saying it was Grimlsey instead of Larry Bigbie?

The Watergate Hotel has wireless internet, by the way...it's pretty cool here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Nicely stated Roy. Every since I was 9 years old and saw the O's vs. the Tokyo Giants in Tokyo in 1971, I've been infected with the Orange/Black virus. There is no cure and I don't want one. You and I sat at the lunch table with Jim Palmer at the 1970 World Series Champs reunion, and its still one of my enduring baseball memories. You said I looked like Carlton Fisk! I was at all 3 games in this Angels series, right behind the O's dugout. I got to see all our boys, and just simply love to watch this team play. And in true baseball fashion, the one game on paper we should have dominated (GRod vs. 8+ ERA Channing), we end up down 7-0 and lose. But watching Gunnar's homers, his electric triple, and he made a fantastic play today on a ball that went under Westburg's glove, Adley do Adley things, Cowser, holy crap. Kimbrel v. Trout with bases loaded, bottom of 9th, 2 outs, down by 2? That was fun. Next game Trout bats leadoff and torches a GRod fastball for a homer to the opposite field.  An observation.... If you didn't know anything about the team, and you only watched game 1 batting practice, you'd think Cowser and O'Hearn were the studs of the team. Mountcastle was taking BP with the reserves and he put on a show as well.  Home after 3 straight days watching this O's team, so jealous of the Balt fans in Balt that get to see the team with regularity. It's a special bunch.
    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...