Jump to content

Auburn OF Mike Bianucci


Recommended Posts

Does anyone have any idea where Mike Bianucci projects to get drafted?

He looks like a good hitter with some pop and a little speed.

He's only got 2 homeruns so far, less than I had been expecting, but otherwise is off to a very good start.

AVG  GP-GS    AB   R   H  2B  3B  HR RBI   TB  SLG%  BB HBP  SO GDP   OB%  SF  SH  SB-ATT   PO   A   E  FLD%.391  14-14   46  13  18  10   0   2  13   34  .739  10   2  12   0  .492   3   1   5-5     27   0   0 1.000

He had strong freshman and sophomore years, too.

Year	Avg	GP	GS	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	TB	SLG%	BB	HBP	SO	GDP	OB%	SF	SH	SB	ATT	PO	A	E	FLD%2006	.359	45	45	181	27	65	13	0	8	31	102	.564	9	6	47	1	.400	4	0	0	2	22	25	6	.8872007	.326	47	46	175	46	57	11	1	14	51	112	.640	29	4	33	1	.427	3	2	8	9	63	7	4	.946TOTAL	.343	92	91	356	73	122	24	1	22	82	214	.601	38	10	80	2	.414	7	2	8	11	85	32	10	.921

I'm intrigued by him and wondering if he's someone the O's could target, but don't know what his draft position is projected to be; rds 2-5, 5-10?

This kid can flat out rake, but it seems he has a hard time in the field. He plays RF and seems like an athletic guy, but his errors and FPCT are definitely less than desirable. I wonder what his deal is - but so far so good this year. He also pitched in HS, so I expect he has a pretty good arm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have any idea where Mike Bianucci projects to get drafted?

He looks like a good hitter with some pop and a little speed.

He's only got 2 homeruns so far, less than I had been expecting, but otherwise is off to a very good start.

AVG  GP-GS    AB   R   H  2B  3B  HR RBI   TB  SLG%  BB HBP  SO GDP   OB%  SF  SH  SB-ATT   PO   A   E  FLD%.391  14-14   46  13  18  10   0   2  13   34  .739  10   2  12   0  .492   3   1   5-5     27   0   0 1.000

He had strong freshman and sophomore years, too.

Year	Avg	GP	GS	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	TB	SLG%	BB	HBP	SO	GDP	OB%	SF	SH	SB	ATT	PO	A	E	FLD%2006	.359	45	45	181	27	65	13	0	8	31	102	.564	9	6	47	1	.400	4	0	0	2	22	25	6	.8872007	.326	47	46	175	46	57	11	1	14	51	112	.640	29	4	33	1	.427	3	2	8	9	63	7	4	.946TOTAL	.343	92	91	356	73	122	24	1	22	82	214	.601	38	10	80	2	.414	7	2	8	11	85	32	10	.921

I'm intrigued by him and wondering if he's someone the O's could target, but don't know what his draft position is projected to be; rds 2-5, 5-10?

Late 2nd - 4th rounder, I'd say. Depends on the rest of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I don't think we really disagree about much. There is wide array of ticket prices. And I think even Fan Price Index shows the Orioles being particularly fair, and if I recall correctly their family of four number for 2022 was $156 You're reading my comments as if they were directed at the Orioles. They were not. Nor were they a criticism, as much as an identification of one of the factors that is feeding the decline of generational popularity in baseball. Many of us have a love for the game. For me that love was cemented by two things. My Dad taking me to the ballpark as a kid... and my Little League experience as a kid.  Affordability was a big part of that. When I was a kid we didn't have two nickles to rub together. My father worked two jobs to make ends meet. Mom delivered newspapers to keep us ahead of the bills. But we could still afford to go to 33rd St a couple times a year... Saw Mark Belanger hit a home run...  that was a rare feat.. and I had a ratty old mitt and some fish-heads to play Little League with. I found old deposit bottles in the woods and took 'em to the 7-11 to buy baseball cards. That's where I fell in love with the game. Eventually my father built a very successful business. and we didn't have to worry about that kind of thing.. But I kept my love for the game that was built in those early experiences. Baseball was once literally the cost of a matinee movie...  stands were packed... all the time... but slowly.. generationally.. this has changed... the last generation to FULLY embrace baseball were boomers...  I guess there's a part of me that thinks selling out every game ...and families embracing is early might change the trajectory baseball is on... wishful thinking maybe      
    • The same thing happened in San Francisco when Roman was there.   They had one truly great season with Kaepernick, and then nothing.   Not that I'm comparing Lamar to Kaepernick, but at their best under Roman, they are pretty similar. I don't know if they are using this system because they think Lamar can't handle a more complex system, or because Roman is stuck using the same stuff over and over.    Roman needs to be gone regardless of what happens with Lamar.  They need to get rid of Ricard and start running a real pro-style offense.   
    • I guess I’ve reached the point of the off-season where I’m at do we really need to add a bat?  Stowers and Vavra spent the last 1/3 of the season up. Westburg is ready. Cowser could be ready are June.    Is Brantley, Voit, or Mancini worth even a one year deal?  I could see us rolling with what we have, figuring out what we have, and signing a vet depth bat like Jesus Aguilar to a milb deal with a ST invite. If we need a bat, we can always get a rental at the deadline. 
    • Interesting to see these numbers in such black and white. It's a huge problem and from what I can tell, its a problem with the calls not coming in quickly. I don't know if the play calls are too complicated, but Jackson rarely gets to get back there, look at the defense, and then snap it early  instead of at zero when you know the defense can get good jumps. This has been a constant problem with Roman, and the fact it hasn't been fixed tells me a it's a limitation of Roman's play calling ability.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...