Jump to content

Flaherty: hot streak, or improved hitter?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Creative approach for a chronic slow starter who has battled for playing time: spend April and part of May on the DL, then come off it when the other middle IFs are hurt.

I think he looks better at the plate, especially when he hits to LF and CF. Still more of a free swinger than he should be (hey, he's an Oriole) but seems to be fouling off some pitches out of the zone, especially the high heat, that he used to miss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Creative approach for a chronic slow starter who has battled for playing time: spend April and part of May on the DL, then come off it when the other middle IFs are hurt.

I think he looks better at the plate, especially when he hits to LF and CF. Still more of a free swinger than he should be (hey, he's an Oriole) but seems to be fouling off some pitches out of the zone, especially the high heat, that he used to miss.

He takes pitches and hits to all fields. That's a breath of fresh air. Has +power and defense for a 2nd basemen. He might be a solution at leadoff or the 2 spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ryan Flaherty is hitting .276/.364/.517 so far this season. On the one hand, it is only 21 games and 66 PA, so obviously, a very small sample size. On the other hand, the early part of the season has always been Flaherty's kryptonite. His stats through June 2 in prior seasons:

2012: .148/.175/.204 (59 PA)

2013: .152/.233/.248 (117 PA)

2014: .206/.280/.289 (107 PA)

At a minimum, Flaherty has avoided putting himself in an early season statistical hole from which it is impossible to completely dig out of. This has a chance to be a decent offensive season for him thanks to his good start. I feel like he is seeing the ball better this year and isn't as vulnerable to swinging at bad pitches.

I think you already know my answer. When a 29-year-old with 750 PAs of a .600-something OPS has a 66-PA stretch of an .881 there's a very high likelihood that he's playing over his head. But his two triples have reminded me why I want the Orioles to modify OPACY to include a 500 ft sign on some outfield fence, probably where the hitting background currently is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you already know my answer. When a 29-year-old with 750 PAs of a .600-something OPS has a 66-PA stretch of an .881 there's a very high likelihood that he's playing over his head. But his two triples have reminded me why I want the Orioles to modify OPACY to include a 500 ft sign on some outfield fence, probably where the hitting background currently is.

Arguing with Drungo makes me feel like an idiot already, but if we start with the assumption that the Ryan of the second half is the real potential Ryan, then we have someone who has averaged just below .500 OPS for @380 PA and over .700 for another @380 plate appearances. So .881 is above his head, but could it be possible/probable that he'll be able to hold together at over .700?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Show me a hitter that is working with Coolbaugh and doing worse and maybe I'll give him some blame. If he convinced Pearce to change what he was doing last year, I would have a problem with that.

Pearce is not hitting worse than last year?

I was mainly just teasing. You cited three players that may have benefited and two that have not. That's basically a coin toss.

Honestly I believe the effect of a hitting coach on performance is very small and often highly overstated, even by the players involved. This is especially true with very small sample sizes. Likewise, I think batting coaches have been overly criticized on this board and in general.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think batting coaches have been overly criticized on this board and in general.

I think that they are overly emphasized. Most are pretty good. None are much different. The Red Sox are complaining that they are always batting with a strike or two on them. The tide changes.

Most major leaguers have a clue by the time they make the majors. I think a hitting coach helps a small bit with the adjustments that players need to make on an ongoing bases. I do not think they modify approach generally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arguing with Drungo makes me feel like an idiot already, but if we start with the assumption that the Ryan of the second half is the real potential Ryan, then we have someone who has averaged just below .500 OPS for @380 PA and over .700 for another @380 plate appearances. So .881 is above his head, but could it be possible/probable that he'll be able to hold together at over .700?
Not sure what you are trying to say here but Flash's career numbers for June ,752OPS, July .649, August. 713, Sept./Oct. .859, are OK by me for a decent fielding MIF/UTIF
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arguing with Drungo makes me feel like an idiot already, but if we start with the assumption that the Ryan of the second half is the real potential Ryan, then we have someone who has averaged just below .500 OPS for @380 PA and over .700 for another @380 plate appearances. So .881 is above his head, but could it be possible/probable that he'll be able to hold together at over .700?

i think it's reasonable to believe that Flaherty could become something better than 660 and less than 880 OPS hitter, perhaps falling into the low to mid 700 OPS range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arguing with Drungo makes me feel like an idiot already, but if we start with the assumption that the Ryan of the second half is the real potential Ryan, then we have someone who has averaged just below .500 OPS for @380 PA and over .700 for another @380 plate appearances. So .881 is above his head, but could it be possible/probable that he'll be able to hold together at over .700?

I think that's a reasonable hope. He shouldn't be defined by his first 750 PA in the majors anyway, since they say it takes about 1500 PA to really get over the experience hump and be the best you can be (of course, there are many exceptions to that rule of thumb).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that's a reasonable hope. He shouldn't be defined by his first 750 PA in the majors anyway, since they say it takes about 1500 PA to really get over the experience hump and be the best you can be (of course, there are many exceptions to that rule of thumb).

Who is they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • There have been 2-3 times when it seemed logical to call him up but they don’t.   I’ve never understood this thing they have for Baker.  Hey, Cole Irvin is available again!!
    • While we lost some talented players, I think the consensus was some of the players we lost were actually blocking more talented prospects. The loss of Westburg and Urias should have been mostly offset by Holliday and Mayo. Instead, they were truly abysmal.  Povich had some nice moments but he was disappointing as well.  Maybe our expectations were too high - Elias is not going to hit on every prospect, and even the ones that turn out good may take a while to adjust. Still, I think it is fair to have expected more out of Mayo and Holliday since the organization deemed them ready to promote.  In addition to the prospects, you had Adley hit a wall, going from a 6 WAR pace to replacement level, and Cowser and O'Hearn both struggling.  Certainly injuries hurt us, but we should have been strong enough to overcome them. Maybe not to sustain a 105 win pace but I think it is fair to say we should have been able to beat 95 wins and win the division even with the injuries.  
    • I was wondering what the knee-jerk reaction would be to an ugly game last night, but the truth is that the bullpen is fine, as is the rest of the team. We lack a true lockdown closer, but we have six arms by my count that are very good relievers in Akin, Perez, Coulombe, Webb, Cano, and Domingez. And you can add Suarez to that list next week, and possibly Povich, who should also make the PS roster as a lefty long relief option to mirror Suarez. Anyway, that game could have and would have gone much differently, IMO, if it were a playoff game. Burnes obviously stays in longer and gets at least through the top of the order if not back down to the bottom third to hand it over to the bullpen. Hopefully we'd be able to scratch out some runs, but that's not the bullpen's fault.  This is an extremely good team with a lead. Let's hope we get on the board early and often starting tonight.
    • Boy, Brandon Young who has some decent numbers at Norfolk must be injured or unimpressive to the front office to not even get a look for this bullpen. Bryan Baker is almost a waste of a call up.
    • Povich is off vs Detroit at least. Even if they carry a 9 man pen, Doubt that 5 will be left handers
    • I hate to say it because they are all eligible to succeed or fail ( DC just coming back ), would probally go with Soto.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...