Jump to content

Flaherty: hot streak, or improved hitter?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

When we first drafted five this fine gentleman, I saw a projection of him as Baltimore's DH in 2017 as his most likely result from some well respected scouting collectives.

He has exceeded every hope that could be had for him defensively and now I believe he is starting to relax as the offensive force and power hitter that it was always imagined that he would late blossom into.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flaherty: 302 AB, 14 HR, 66RBI, 305/384/523/907 at AA in 2011 before the O's selected him in the Rule 5 draft. It was probably the reason the O's selected him.

Maybe Ryan is just fulfilling his potential. Getting regular at bats helps. When Schoop comes back I can see Ryan playing a COF spot if he is still hitting well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flaherty: 302 AB, 14 HR, 66RBI, 305/384/523/907 at AA in 2011 before the O's selected him in the Rule 5 draft. It was probably the reason the O's selected him.

Maybe Ryan is just fulfilling his potential. Getting regular at bats helps. When Schoop comes back I can see Ryan playing a COF spot if he is still hitting well.

I can see him as the 2016 First Baseman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been as big a critic of Ryan as there is, but I think his approach since his return is significantly better than I have ever seen with him, even when he has been in good streaks. He appears to be seeing the ball much better, is quieter in his stance and is laying off the really bad pitches that he has consistently chased when not doing well in the past. Hope he has turned a corner because he is very reliable and versatile in the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't go overboard guys. If he can be the good utility infielder he is, and post a .720-.740 OPS instead of a sub-.700 OPS, he'll have great value to this club. That's all I'm asking.
If he is posting a .720-.740 OPS he is a starting 2B somewhere.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Drungo, most everything you post is basically stat based. Do you ever form an opinion on watching a hitter like Flaherty or Paredes and say to yourself, he looks like he's changed something or doing something differently? I never really see you making comments like so and so really looked good tonight. He was doing this or he was doing that.

I don't know that I'm astute enough to pick up on minor adjustments. And I know I'm not good enough to tell when a major league player has made a tweak that leads to a change in something like line-drive rate. All I know is that most players in mid-career are constantly making adjustments to try to stay right around what they've done in the past. Yes, players sometimes, occasionally fix flaws and have a step change in performance. It's real hard to tell when that is.

And I'm not making fun of Flaherty with that Pascual Perez reference. I'm just making fun of the idea that Flaherty "coming to work every day" is unusual or noteworthy among major leaguers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • There have been 2-3 times when it seemed logical to call him up but they don’t.   I’ve never understood this thing they have for Baker.  Hey, Cole Irvin is available again!!
    • While we lost some talented players, I think the consensus was some of the players we lost were actually blocking more talented prospects. The loss of Westburg and Urias should have been mostly offset by Holliday and Mayo. Instead, they were truly abysmal.  Povich had some nice moments but he was disappointing as well.  Maybe our expectations were too high - Elias is not going to hit on every prospect, and even the ones that turn out good may take a while to adjust. Still, I think it is fair to have expected more out of Mayo and Holliday since the organization deemed them ready to promote.  In addition to the prospects, you had Adley hit a wall, going from a 6 WAR pace to replacement level, and Cowser and O'Hearn both struggling.  Certainly injuries hurt us, but we should have been strong enough to overcome them. Maybe not to sustain a 105 win pace but I think it is fair to say we should have been able to beat 95 wins and win the division even with the injuries.  
    • I was wondering what the knee-jerk reaction would be to an ugly game last night, but the truth is that the bullpen is fine, as is the rest of the team. We lack a true lockdown closer, but we have six arms by my count that are very good relievers in Akin, Perez, Coulombe, Webb, Cano, and Domingez. And you can add Suarez to that list next week, and possibly Povich, who should also make the PS roster as a lefty long relief option to mirror Suarez. Anyway, that game could have and would have gone much differently, IMO, if it were a playoff game. Burnes obviously stays in longer and gets at least through the top of the order if not back down to the bottom third to hand it over to the bullpen. Hopefully we'd be able to scratch out some runs, but that's not the bullpen's fault.  This is an extremely good team with a lead. Let's hope we get on the board early and often starting tonight.
    • Boy, Brandon Young who has some decent numbers at Norfolk must be injured or unimpressive to the front office to not even get a look for this bullpen. Bryan Baker is almost a waste of a call up.
    • Povich is off vs Detroit at least. Even if they carry a 9 man pen, Doubt that 5 will be left handers
    • I hate to say it because they are all eligible to succeed or fail ( DC just coming back ), would probally go with Soto.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...