Jump to content

At what OPS would you not offer Davis a QO?


Scrat1

Davis QO cutoff point  

56 members have voted

  1. 1. Davis QO cutoff point



Recommended Posts

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Good baseball players are at a premium, as always. Nobody cares if you hit 25 homers if you're not any good. See Ryan Howard.

Mark Reynolds, 2012: .221/.335/.429. We non-tendered him and he got a one-year, $6 mm deal from Cleveland.

Chris Davis, 2015: .221/.312/.462. And he's going to get $65 mm? I think not!

Unless Davis picks up the pace considerably, he's pretty much the same player Reynolds was three years ago. Davis is a better defensive 1B (but not drastically so) and can play the OF. Otherwise, they are streaky guys who have a lot o power and strike out a ton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ham sandwich. Or even turkey sandwich. I am offering him a QO pretty much no matter what (first, Boras clients don't take QOs, second, even if he tanks this year and does take the QO, it is still a one year deal and I make the calculated wager that the fluke of 2013 can be recaptured in a one year situation, or even anywhere remotely close to it).

<a href="http://s1106.photobucket.com/user/isestrex/media/Gifs/really-good-point.gif.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1106.photobucket.com/albums/h367/isestrex/Gifs/really-good-point.gif" border="0" alt=" photo really-good-point.gif"/></a>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ham sandwich. Or even turkey sandwich. I am offering him a QO pretty much no matter what (first, Boras clients don't take QOs, second, even if he tanks this year and does take the QO, it is still a one year deal and I make the calculated wager that the fluke of 2013 can be recaptured in a one year situation, or even anywhere remotely close to it).

Completely agree. One year 15 million is not that horrible for a guy that has done what he has done. We need the pick and if he returns, so be it. There will be a team that thinks they can fix him and that team might be right given the performance of ERod and Arieta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Completely agree. One year 15 million is not that horrible for a guy that has done what he has done. We need the pick and if he returns, so be it. There will be a team that thinks they can fix him and that team might be right given the performance of ERod and Arieta.
Yeah maybe they'll make him into a pitcher.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still hope he gets ridiculously hot and hits 40 home runs this year. It will not only make it much more likely that we see the World Series, but it will also make it very clear that he will get both a QO, we get a pick, and we don't have to waste any mental activity thinking about trying to sign him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mark Reynolds, 2012: .221/.335/.429. We non-tendered him and he got a one-year, $6 mm deal from Cleveland.

Chris Davis, 2015: .221/.312/.462. And he's going to get $65 mm? I think not!

Unless Davis picks up the pace considerably, he's pretty much the same player Reynolds was three years ago. Davis is a better defensive 1B (but not drastically so) and can play the OF. Otherwise, they are streaky guys who have a lot o power and strike out a ton.

I compared the two in another thread about making trades, and I couldn't agree more. With the CBA ending next year, it may be beneficial for a player accepting the QO and rolling the dice on a better system under the new agreement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd offer him a QO. He is Boras's client and he won't accept it and we'll get the draft pick when he leaves to be overpaid by another team.

If he is batting OPS of .700, and with his decline for 2 straight years, not sure, he would get a big contract, in spite of having Boras.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...