Jump to content

Eduardo and the Afternoon Game


weams

Recommended Posts

We gave up a mid range, AA pitcher that was struggling, but talented pitcher.

And it remains to be seen, if he will be around for 1000+ innings.

If he was still here, he would probably still be here in AA and several other arms in the food chain between him and here.

Sorry, but I would make that trade again, over and over.

And I am sure, you wouldn't.

We just have to agree to disagree.

But, Roch is right, and see his blog comments and twitter feeds makes OH seem tame, the way people are still debating this issue.

The debate is an easy one for a dissenter. The Orioles did not win the World Series. Ergo, Bad deal. The deal was predicated on taking a shot at that. And not about Eduardo finding four MPH. Amazing how they do that.

What you do is look for any deal that is made with a rental. Clamor for an extension. Make it seem like something that COULD happen. Wait for the failure in the postseason. Brag. And not Humbly. That is the recipe.

I am not saying those who wanted to retain Miller are this.

I am saying folks still smashing Duquette for the deal and saying they foresaw the dominance of both Miller and Rodriguez are. As well as those saying that they knew we would fall short of the WS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply
He might still be in AA if the Orioles didn't make the changes that the Red Sox apparently did. I didn't have a big problem at the time of the trade. If I knew now what I knew then, I would have been. Hindsight, but Rodriguez became a different pitcher after the trade. Coincidence? I don't think so.

You have to give something to get something but there is always a limit to what's acceptable.

Sometimes the change of scenery is needed for whatever reason.

The debate is an easy one for a dissenter. The Orioles did not win the World Series. Ergo, Bad deal. The deal was predicated on taking a shot at that. And not about Eduardo finding four MPH. Amazing how they do that.

Like I said to Frobby, if you read the feedback on his blogs, you will find the people up in arms and still hotly debating this issue, and with the tweeter feeds, makes this place seem very tame. Which is probably, what brought out his comment about not getting the fray. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also think he means..........he's tired of discussing it week after week for the past 3 months or more. At some point there's not much more to say.

I think that's the point Roch and others are making. I haven't seen anything new on the subject for quite a while. ERod's emergence, along with Nelson Cruz's lengthy slump, has been helpful in getting this board past the same kind of repetitive discussion about not trying harder to sign Cruz,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But when you give up 1000+ innings of a cost controlled good starting pitcher for 20 innings of a relief pitcher who will be gone when the season is over, that decision is highly questionable. "You have to give up something to get something" is far too simplistic an equation. We've beaten this to death in other threads, so I don't want to get back into a full blown debate about it here, but simplistic statements like the one Roch made in the OP and the one you quote from Buck are not very illuminating.

In a similar line of thought I think it is questionable to keep 3-4 players that will be FA at the end of the season if

a) you know you're not going to be able to resign them

b) you have the opportunity of moving them for an Erod for Miller type deal or better.

We made the playoffs last year without Wieters and a down season from Davis. Neither are having eye opening years thus far so perhaps they are worth more to us than anyone else.

Chen has been up and down this season and I believe is replaceable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He might still be in AA if the Orioles didn't make the changes that the Red Sox apparently did. I didn't have a big problem at the time of the trade. If I knew now what I knew then, I would have been. Hindsight, but Rodriguez became a different pitcher after the trade. Coincidence? I don't think so.

You have to give something to get something but there is always a limit to what's acceptable.

I remember somebody posted something that the Red Sox claim they didn't do anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roch must not be familiar with the long-term memories of baseball fans, and O's fans in particular. Some of us are still griping about the Glenn Davis deal! Thankfully, no matter what EdRod does from now on, the A. Miller trade can never approach that one for Worst O's Deal Ever. At least we got a few productive and useful months out of Miller!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you have traded anything for Miller? Of course not. So the argument that we were going for the WS or whatever is valid up to a point. You can't rationalize any trade as a good or acceptable one just because we "were going for it".

I was all for the Miller trade. All for it. Still am. We beat the Tigers because of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you have traded anything for Miller? Of course not. So the argument that we were going for the WS or whatever is valid up to a point. You can't rationalize any trade as a good or acceptable one just because we "were going for it".

I never said it was good or bad. Eduardo was the prize chip we had in 2013 and the offseason to 2014. He flopped. in a Major Dude way. Bloom all off that Rose. Got a little dinged. Came back in AA and looked like Brian Matusz does now, not Brian Matusz when he was in AA. Dan tried to give up other arms to Boston for Miller. He was told Miller was going to Detroit if Eduardo was not sent with minutes to spare. He pulled the trigger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a similar line of thought I think it is questionable to keep 3-4 players that will be FA at the end of the season if

a) you know you're not going to be able to resign them

b) you have the opportunity of moving them for an Erod for Miller type deal or better.

No, no, no, no, no, no, no.

We are a contending team. Not the Phillies. We get a pick that is valuable for all of our QO FAs. That's what we get. And we try to win this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do, wanted Miller, others were hot for Lester, but, I thought bullpen arm and away from the Tigers was the best move.

I would have taken Lester too. And he would have cost a lot and been strictly a rental as well. I heard we were very close to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • There have been 2-3 times when it seemed logical to call him up but they don’t.   I’ve never understood this thing they have for Baker.  Hey, Cole Irvin is available again!!
    • While we lost some talented players, I think the consensus was some of the players we lost were actually blocking more talented prospects. The loss of Westburg and Urias should have been mostly offset by Holliday and Mayo. Instead, they were truly abysmal.  Povich had some nice moments but he was disappointing as well.  Maybe our expectations were too high - Elias is not going to hit on every prospect, and even the ones that turn out good may take a while to adjust. Still, I think it is fair to have expected more out of Mayo and Holliday since the organization deemed them ready to promote.  In addition to the prospects, you had Adley hit a wall, going from a 6 WAR pace to replacement level, and Cowser and O'Hearn both struggling.  Certainly injuries hurt us, but we should have been strong enough to overcome them. Maybe not to sustain a 105 win pace but I think it is fair to say we should have been able to beat 95 wins and win the division even with the injuries.  
    • I was wondering what the knee-jerk reaction would be to an ugly game last night, but the truth is that the bullpen is fine, as is the rest of the team. We lack a true lockdown closer, but we have six arms by my count that are very good relievers in Akin, Perez, Coulombe, Webb, Cano, and Domingez. And you can add Suarez to that list next week, and possibly Povich, who should also make the PS roster as a lefty long relief option to mirror Suarez. Anyway, that game could have and would have gone much differently, IMO, if it were a playoff game. Burnes obviously stays in longer and gets at least through the top of the order if not back down to the bottom third to hand it over to the bullpen. Hopefully we'd be able to scratch out some runs, but that's not the bullpen's fault.  This is an extremely good team with a lead. Let's hope we get on the board early and often starting tonight.
    • Boy, Brandon Young who has some decent numbers at Norfolk must be injured or unimpressive to the front office to not even get a look for this bullpen. Bryan Baker is almost a waste of a call up.
    • Povich is off vs Detroit at least. Even if they carry a 9 man pen, Doubt that 5 will be left handers
    • I hate to say it because they are all eligible to succeed or fail ( DC just coming back ), would probally go with Soto.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...